| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
January 13th 05, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Lancer wrote:
OK, but I agreed with that. I said that DX helps the splatter by this: If he's in Florida talking on a bone stock radio, I won't hear him in Los Angeles. Now, if he decides to fire up an amp, I still won't hear him in LA. =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Now skip rolls in, I can here him without an amp and with an amp, but on the adjacent channel, where the noise was zero, I now have a ton of signals, so the skip didn't help those signals "bounce into" LA? of course it did. Now the adjacent channel has more "splatter" than before, skip didn't help enhance the noise level on my end? =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0La ndshark Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear. Exactly,,it "affected it", which is exactly what I and Shark maintained, to which some took issue with. and skip also increased his splatter that you hear. Again,,,another example of skip affecting the splatter, Touche. But The relation between his signal and his splatter doesn't change. Skip affects splatter. |
|
#3
January 13th 05, 07:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
January 14th 05, 02:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:39:07 GMT, Lancer wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:03:43 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: Lancer wrote: OK, but I agreed with that. I said that DX helps the splatter by this: If he's in Florida talking on a bone stock radio, I won't hear him in Los Angeles. Now, if he decides to fire up an amp, I still won't hear him in LA. ********Now skip rolls in, I can here him without an amp and with an amp, but on the adjacent channel, where the noise was zero, I now have a ton of signals, so the skip didn't help those signals "bounce into" LA? of course it did. Now the adjacent channel has more "splatter" than before, skip didn't help enhance the noise level on my end? ****************Landshark Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear. Exactly,,it "affected it", which is exactly what I and Shark maintained, to which some took issue with. and skip also increased his splatter that you hear. Again,,,another example of skip affecting the splatter, Touche. Quit clipping my posts apart to fit your needs. That's exactly what he does. He destroys the original context to make it look like you said something that you didn't. He's either a clever troll or a someone who is totally devoid of comprehension abilities. I was trying to point out to Shark that skip will progate the original signal and the splatter equally. Anyone with average intelligence understands this. But I guess some seem to need the exact literal finite details colored in or they grasp the wrong meaning. But The relation between his signal and his splatter doesn't change. Skip affects splatter. No more than the original part of his signal... Do you think that skip effects the splatter component of his signal more that the desirable part of his signal? and it does not effect the realtionship between the two. Right! The relationship between the fundamental signal and the splatter components present will not change with the variation of the DX conditions. They move together harmoniously. Dave "Sandbagger" |
|
#5
January 14th 05, 05:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:39:07 GMT, Lancer wrote: On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:03:43 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: Lancer wrote: OK, but I agreed with that. I said that DX helps the splatter by this: If he's in Florida talking on a bone stock radio, I won't hear him in Los Angeles. Now, if he decides to fire up an amp, I still won't hear him in LA. =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Now skip rolls in, I can here him without an amp and with an amp, but on the adjacent channel, where the noise was zero, I now have a ton of signals, so the skip didn't help those signals "bounce into" LA? of course it did. Now the adjacent channel has more "splatter" than before, skip didn't help enhance the noise level on my end? =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0La ndshark Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear. Exactly,,it "affected it", which is exactly what I and Shark maintained, to which some took issue with. and skip also increased his splatter that you hear. Again,,,another example of skip affecting the splatter, Touche. Quit clipping my posts apart to fit your needs. (That's exactly what he does. He destroys the original context to make it look like you said something that you didn't) Now now Davie,,,,you are once again permitting your lack of personal control over your emotions dictate your topics again...your lack of education conerning communication etiquette and skill always manifests in your posts when you disagree with someone. You never learned how to debate and attack the topic or subject,,you attack the poster.....illustrative of your ignorance. Just for the record, he most certainly ackowldged the realtionship between skip and splatter. He's either a clever troll or a someone who is totally devoid of comprehension abilities. LOL,,you are the one needing to ask everyone else what they mean when they use sixth grade terminology on a repeat and ongoing basis. (I was trying to point out to Shark that skip will progate the original signal and the splatter equally.) Funny,,,,here you are trying to make a point that you apparently think Shark took issue with,,,,he didn;t,,and neither did I. Anyone with average intelligence understands this. But I guess some seem to need the exact literal finite details colored in or they grasp the wrong meaning. Expressed superbly by the illustration of your posting history littered with redundant questions of "What did you mean by...". Only you have this difficulty and your posting history shows such, Projecting your character flaws onto another won't make it so. But The relation between his signal and his splatter doesn't change. Skip affects splatter. (No more than the original part of his signal... Do you think that skip effects the splatter component of his signal more that the desirable part of his signal? and it does not effect the realtionship between the two.) Right! The relationship between the fundamental signal and the splatter components present will not change with the variation of the DX conditions. They move together harmoniously. Try and get lucid again, if you can muster the courage, Once again, you aer talking to yourself. No one made such a claim that splatter changes dx conditions, which is why you taking issue with yourself is such a gift. Dave "Sandbagger" N3CVJ |
|
#6
January 14th 05, 05:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: (Lancer)
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:03:43 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: Lancer wrote: OK, but I agreed with that. I said that DX helps the splatter by this: If he's in Florida talking on a bone stock radio, I won't hear him in Los Angeles. Now, if he decides to fire up an amp, I still won't hear him in LA. =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0No w skip rolls in, I can here him without an amp and with an amp, but on the adjacent channel, where the noise was zero, I now have a ton of signals, so the skip didn't help those signals "bounce into" LA? of course it did. Now the adjacent channel has more "splatter" than before, skip didn't help enhance the noise level on my end? =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C 2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Landshark Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear. Exactly,,it "affected it", which is exactly what I and Shark maintained, to which some took issue with. _ and skip also increased his splatter that you hear. _ Again,,,another example of skip affecting the splatter, Touche. Quit clipping my posts apart to fit your needs. Deal,,,IF you quit attempting to qualify exactly what I said by adding components and additional words when I never said anything of the sort, I'll stop snipping your posted parts that don't apply to anything I said. I was trying to point out to Shark that skip will progate the original signal and the splatter equally. But The relation between his signal and his splatter doesn't change. Skip affects splatter. No more than the original part of his signal... Skip affects splatter. Do you think that skip effects the splatter component of his signal more that the desirable part of his signal? And it does not effect the realtionship between the two. The mere acknolwedgement of an existing relationship between skip and splatter is proof positive once again of the ONLY thing I said,,,,,,,,"Skip affects splatter". If the splatter components are at a 10% level compared to the level of his signal, then with skip they will still be at that level. Touche... You can make all the comments you want about what you want and clarifications, as they sure as hell don't apply to anything I said,,I emntioned nothing abotu levels, relationships, splatter boxes, etc,,, Now,,,once again,,, here is the bottom line from your post... Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear. and skip also increased his splatter that you hear. ,,let's see that again,,, just to make absolutely certain you aer saying what I said originally.. skip increased his signal that you hear,,, and lastly,, and skip also increases his splatter that you hear. What's the problem? Adding additional clarifications like "relationship", "splatter boxes",etc...has nothing to do with my original statement or its context,,,the words were not mine. All I said is exactly what you repeated above, Trying to invoke terms like "relationship" *after* the fact when I NEVER mentioned such terms, changes the dynamics and context of what I claimed,,,,the exact same thing you claimed above. |
|
#7
January 14th 05, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:06:29 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote: From: (Lancer) On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:03:43 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: Lancer wrote: OK, but I agreed with that. I said that DX helps the splatter by this: If he's in Florida talking on a bone stock radio, I won't hear him in Los Angeles. Now, if he decides to fire up an amp, I still won't hear him in LA. ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*Now skip rolls in, I can here him without an amp and with an amp, but on the adjacent channel, where the noise was zero, I now have a ton of signals, so the skip didn't help those signals "bounce into" LA? of course it did. Now the adjacent channel has more "splatter" than before, skip didn't help enhance the noise level on my end? ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃ つ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*Landshark Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear. Exactly,,it "affected it", which is exactly what I and Shark maintained, to which some took issue with. _ and skip also increased his splatter that you hear. _ Again,,,another example of skip affecting the splatter, Touche. Quit clipping my posts apart to fit your needs. Deal,,,IF you quit attempting to qualify exactly what I said by adding components and additional words when I never said anything of the sort, I'll stop snipping your posted parts that don't apply to anything I said. I was trying to point out to Shark that skip will progate the original signal and the splatter equally. But The relation between his signal and his splatter doesn't change. Skip affects splatter. No more than the original part of his signal... Skip affects splatter. Do you think that skip effects the splatter component of his signal more that the desirable part of his signal? And it does not effect the realtionship between the two. The mere acknolwedgement of an existing relationship between skip and splatter is proof positive once again of the ONLY thing I said,,,,,,,,"Skip affects splatter". If the splatter components are at a 10% level compared to the level of his signal, then with skip they will still be at that level. Touche... You can make all the comments you want about what you want and clarifications, as they sure as hell don't apply to anything I said,,I emntioned nothing abotu levels, relationships, splatter boxes, etc,,, Now,,,once again,,, here is the bottom line from your post... Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear. and skip also increased his splatter that you hear. ,,let's see that again,,, just to make absolutely certain you aer saying what I said originally.. skip increased his signal that you hear,,, and lastly,, and skip also increases his splatter that you hear. What's the problem? Adding additional clarifications like "relationship", "splatter boxes",etc...has nothing to do with my original statement or its context,,,the words were not mine. All I said is exactly what you repeated above, Trying to invoke terms like "relationship" *after* the fact when I NEVER mentioned such terms, changes the dynamics and context of what I claimed,,,,the exact same thing you claimed above. Forget it Twist, all you want to do is make damn sure that Dave never proves you wrong. If you want to keep twisting stuff around to make yourself look better, feel free. But ya know what? Dave proved you wrong this time. Have a nice day... |
|
#8
January 14th 05, 05:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*
ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃ つ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ*ﾃつ* WTF is that, Twist!?  |
|
#9
January 14th 05, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lancer wrote:
Forget it Twist, all you want You say "forget it", but go on to add your 2 cents.... to do is make damn sure that Dave never proves you wrong. No such animal. I can care less who posts what. If it's wrong, I will say so, regardles who it is. Try not letting who posts what cloud your judgement over *what* is posted. If you want to keep twisting stuff around to make yourself look better, feel free. Only you *and* N3CVJ tried adding words to my claim that were never said by me...THAT is twisting. But ya know what? Dave proved you wrong this time. Have a nice day... And that's the beauty of usenet...diagreeing without getting personal. Try and explain that to the one who "proved wrong" my claim that "Skip affects splatter". Whether you can admit or not, that was my claim, cut and dry. |
|
#10
January 14th 05, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
NCVJ wrote:
Yes, you are correct, the DX enables distant splatter boxes to be heard in you local area |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Homebrew | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Digital | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Digital | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Homebrew | |||
| How to improve reception | Equipment | |||
Hybrid Mode
