On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :

snip
Bust just like that military newsgroup that you

stuck your foot in your mouth over with Frank,


I have to agree with Shark on this one,,


Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL!

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :

snip
Bust just like that military newsgroup that you

stuck your foot in your mouth over with Frank,


I have to agree with Shark on this one,,


Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL!

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring out the "best" in our
little psychotic friend.

It's also no secret that his psychobabble seems to keep you going.

At least back before you guys found a common love for the wrong side
of the political spectrum....

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :
snip
(Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL! )

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring

out the "best" in our little psychotic friend.


And it's no coincidence you begin your very next post with an insult in
regards to the one that asked you to please illustrate or name this
other mystery hammie you claimed agrees with you that roger beeps are
illegal.


It's also no secret that his psychobabble

seems to keep you going.

At least back before you guys found a

common love for the wrong side of the political
spectrum....

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ


An excellent example of your twistedness, as one who holds an opposing
view to your own myopic views are not wrong, Davie.
It is apparent in your ramblings that you indeed believe such
self-serving and self-limiting statements, but as usual, you are
self-projecting, as no one else shares your minority and radical views
except these mystery hammies you continue to invoke but are unable to
identify. Hey, it's all good, Davie,,people like you need comfort and
conjured playmates can actually provide therepeutic benefits in
children.

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:49:42 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :
snip
(Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL! )

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring
out the "best" in our little psychotic friend.


And it's no coincidence you begin your very next post with an insult in
regards to the one that asked you to please illustrate or name this
other mystery hammie you claimed agrees with you that roger beeps are
illegal.

Who says it has to be a ham?



It's also no secret that his psychobabble
seems to keep you going.
At least back before you guys found a
common love for the wrong side of the political
spectrum....
An excellent example of your twistedness, as one who holds an opposing
view to your own myopic views are not wrong, Davie.
It is apparent in your ramblings that you indeed believe such
self-serving and self-limiting statements, but as usual, you are
self-projecting, as no one else shares your minority and radical views
except these mystery hammies you continue to invoke but are unable to
identify. Hey, it's all good, Davie,,people like you need comfort and
conjured playmates can actually provide therepeutic benefits in
children.

I'm not the one who changes my screen name at the drop of a hat.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Jan 25, 2005, 10:34am (EST-1)
From: Dave Hall Group: =A0=A0 rec.radio.cb
Subject: =A0=A0 Roger Beeps 100% ILLEGAL Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Jan 25,
2005, 11:34am Organization: =A0=A0 home.ptd.net/~n3cvj X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-vM3XMc8/W17T/MJSuVU+Mm09AW3YxGyjG/Cm/AEv8v+A27wk6JS7SKqn50xJhZL7DMvbhk=
56U1mcXO4!aoIWBsLgS39x93Argz8UGjy+wOTU0zcOEbytPIa5 TRjLu6brU9AR0S2fTKXcbFGf=
MweKqO9bb7pY!UdMvXYbyDoA=3D
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a
copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.22 On
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:49:42 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in : snip
(Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL! )

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring

out the "best" in our little psychotic friend.

And it's no coincidence you begin your very next post with an insult in
regards to the one that asked you to please illustrate or name this
other mystery hammie you claimed agrees with you that roger beeps are
illegal.

Who says it has to be a ham?

Why,you did, Davie,,,go back and read your response to what I said, as
your memory has been savagely raped. You clearly responded that you are
not the only ham present in this group to maintain that roger beeps are
illegal. Of course, asking you to share your hallucination with the
group has caused your gears to slip...again.


It's also no secret that his psychobabble

seems to keep you going.



Coming from one who suffers vivid hallucinations and insists others can
view your hallucinations also, is quite closer to any "psychobabble"
than anything anyone else in this group has ever done, with the
exception of N8WWM who you have not only defended many times, but
admitted (after being caught) that you "fell into his bull****". You
need to stop permitting your emotions to lead you around by the nose, as
anyone is able to come along and elicit your ire.



At least back before you guys found a

common love for the wrong side of the political
spectrum....

An excellent example of your twistedness, as one who holds an opposing
view to your own myopic views are not wrong, Davie. It is apparent in
your ramblings that you indeed believe such self-serving and
self-limiting statements, but as usual, you are self-projecting, as no
one else shares your minority and radical views except these mystery
hammies you continue to invoke but are unable to identify. Hey, it's all
good, Davie,,people like you need comfort and conjured playmates can
actually provide therepeutic benefits in children.

I'm not the one who changes my screen name
at the drop of a hat.


Quite right,,you're the one who changes their access path to the group
with different servers at the drop of a hat.. You're the one that can
not distinguish between fiduciary and judiciary, resulting in your
inability to explain any differences between a dx'er and a speeder in
regards to this "federal law" you incorrectly harp about.


You're the one who ignorantly and incorrectly hold a dx'er and and a
speeder going faster than 70 MPH as a "federal criminal" based on your
claim that the laws were enacted by the feds.


You're the one who incorrectly shouts that "roger beeps are illegal",
based on nothing more than your inability to locate a law permitting
them.



You're the one who incorrectly claimed other hams agreed with your
stated ignorance that roger beeps were illegal and began stuttering over
your claim when your hallucinations were observed empiracally, noted,
and questioned.


You're the one whose posting history is chock full of insults to those
with whom you disagree You're the one who claims your derogatory terms
are not born of emotion.



In fact, if one were to bother, one could google "sandbagger" and check
your posts to anyone who you ever disagreed with, long before you made
me your inner personal demon and anti-christ. In fact, you have been
told about your inability to maintain proper communications skill sans
insult long before I ever pointed out your inabilities to do so.



But.....sharing your selective concern over what is routinely practiced
in here by many illustrates your agenda. Whenever you are cornered with
your own words, you run and attempt to distance yourself from them and
make your posts personal, offtopic, and try to direct them towards
anything else, as your bull**** is in the spotlight. Yes, Davie, you are
the one that made all those claims above..only you, all alone, as no one
agrees with you,,,,except N8WWM. Now stop posting the gay porn. Your
temper has the best of you, but you are laying quite the proper trail
with your pal Dogie.
Enjoy. : )

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:55:08 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

I'm not the one who changes my screen name
at the drop of a hat.


Quite right,,you're the one who changes their access path to the group
with different servers at the drop of a hat..

You give me far more credit than I deserve. I use a single newserver
to access this newsgroup. Nothing else.

You have failed to prove otherwise. Your opinion in that regard is
worthless.


You're the one that can
not distinguish between fiduciary and judiciary, resulting in your
inability to explain any differences between a dx'er and a speeder in
regards to this "federal law" you incorrectly harp about.

I never made that claim.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:55:08 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
I'm not the one who changes my screen name
at the drop of a hat.

Quite right,,you're the one who changes their access path to the group
with different servers at the drop of a hat..

You give me far more credit than I deserve.


I give you credit for exactly what you deserve.

I use a single newserver to access this

newsgroup. Nothing else.


Nevertheless, your access path has changed


You have failed to prove otherwise. Your opinion in that regard is
worthless.

You're the one that can
not distinguish between fiduciary and judiciary, resulting in your
inability to explain any differences between a dx'er and a speeder in
regards to this "federal law" you incorrectly harp about.

I never made that claim.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ


It's not a difficult matter, Dave, but it has you beside yourself with
confusion and pain.
Being forced to face yourself yields some interesting retreats from your
dulled senses.
The only criteria you submitted for your ignorant and erroneous claim
that one who dx'es is a "federal criminal", is that they are breaking a
law enacted by the federal government....so goes the 70 MPH mandate. Let
us know when you prevail over this inner struggle I caused you, and let
us know which side of you won.

I bought a Realistic TRC 465 SSB which receives but only hums on
transmit. Can anyone recommend a GOOD cb shop for repairs? I really
want to use this radio and would like it fixed. Thanks.

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:22:33 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in :

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :

snip
Bust just like that military newsgroup that you

stuck your foot in your mouth over with Frank,


I have to agree with Shark on this one,,


Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL!

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring out the "best" in our
little psychotic friend.


You're confused, Dave.


It's also no secret that his psychobabble seems to keep you going.


Newsflash: I argue with Twisty to keep my own wits sharp. I argue with
you because you are ignorant.


At least back before you guys found a common love for the wrong side
of the political spectrum....


Your political spectrum analyzer is out of alignment, Dave. And you
haven't read a single word I've written because, and to put it simple
enough for a 1st grader, I don't take sides when it comes to politics.
I oppose Bush because he's a criminal, not because he's a Republican.
And if you had any evidence..... or even a reasonable suspicion that
Kerry was in any way a criminal, I could accept it. But so far you
have offered nothing but excuses, logical fallacies, and websites with
forged documents and paranoid rants. If you are really a supporter of
the Republican party then you should keep quiet on political issues
because you are giving your party some very poor representation.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:22:58 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:


Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring out the "best" in our
little psychotic friend.


You're confused, Dave.

Hardly.



It's also no secret that his psychobabble seems to keep you going.


Newsflash: I argue with Twisty to keep my own wits sharp.

You admitted it yourself, Twisty "debates" by playing head games with
people. That's hardly your style Frank. Certainly not something worthy
enough to be called "sharpening your wits".


I argue with you because you are ignorant.

Which started coincidentally when you found out that I support the
opposite political party. Before that we were on good terms. Now you
"think" (and I use the term loosely) that I'm an idiot for it. If that
isn't a partisan pundit attitude, I don't know what is.

Only an idiot argues with another idiot Frank. You "argue" with me,
because you are unable to present your "side" with anything other than
your own opinions. The fact that I can effectively deflect your
"facts" as the op-ed opinions that they truly are frustrates you.

The facts are not in your favor Frank.

At least back before you guys found a common love for the wrong side
of the political spectrum....


Your political spectrum analyzer is out of alignment, Dave.

You certainly are entitled to your opinion, as wrong as it might
be.....

And you
haven't read a single word I've written because, and to put it simple
enough for a 1st grader, I don't take sides when it comes to politics.
I oppose Bush because he's a criminal, not because he's a Republican.

Where is the proof that Bush is a "criminal"? What is your basis for
making such an outlandishly absurd and so typically partisan claim?


And if you had any evidence..... or even a reasonable suspicion that
Kerry was in any way a criminal, I could accept it.

The evidence is there. It came out of Kerry's own mouth. He admitted
to taking part in the atrocities in Vietnam on Meet the Press on April
18th 1971. Now Frank, you are a man who claims to embrace logic, so
riddle me this then. If Kerry is telling the truth about his part in
these "atrocities", then is he not guilty of a war crime? On the other
hand, if he didn't take part, and the whole issue was a blown up
fabrication, doesn't that make him a liar? Would you want someone who
lied like that to be your CNC? How many other lies did he make in the
aftermath of the who winter soldier debacle and the VVAW movement
which followed?


But so far you
have offered nothing but excuses, logical fallacies, and websites with
forged documents and paranoid rants.

As opposed to the sites you provided which were nothing more than the
flip side of what I provided?

You discard what I provided because you refuse to acknowledge the
possibility. You don't want to believe it so you deny it. You came up
with some sort of "font analysis" on one document, and concluded that
it was a forgery, so then you projected that conclusion to all the
rest of the evidence.


If you are really a supporter of
the Republican party then you should keep quiet on political issues
because you are giving your party some very poor representation.

I am a conservative, and I support those who best represent my
political views.

I also believe in the history and honor of our country, its military
and the judgement of its leader in matters of national security and
enemies of the state.

Dave
"Sandbagger"