NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Wed, Feb 16, 2005, 8:07am (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0
Wed, Feb 16, 2005, 8:07am (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-TShFVDFyBPhfsxWyQKsHuDYfpH8p66U95WsAM9zN3ZjEjB1c3+ PVlF4BZUBzgUASXUsIeP=
TYxb8p0fM!KdKDcYIRstG9mKBLqA07AsiQMHbhqWOH6LGJH+Zr tjyfDkZzfEzRt/pELkbty0Mk=
gSLg
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.23
Vinnie S. wrote in
:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:29:58 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote:
That's a far cry from you claiming it was a "requirement" the Pa. police
*give* you the extra speed of a few miles per hour. Nevertheless, you
illustrate once again you speak of things you know nothing of (the law)
and do not need Frank to make you reverse your earlier position. Since
you realized your error, there is no need to provide you with the Pa.
vehicle code. Flip-flop.

You're right. I shouldn't have deviated from my
original stance since, as it turns out, I was

right about it.

See:
http://members.aol.com/StatutesP1/75PA3368.html
Pay particular attention to 3368 (c) number 4., which states:
"No person may be convicted upon evidence obtained through the use of
devices authorized by paragraphs (2) and (3) unless the speed recorded
is six or more miles per hour in excess of the legal speed limit.
Furthermore, no person may be convicted upon evidence obtained through
the use of devices authorized by paragraph (3) in an area where the
legal speed limit is less than 55 miles per hour if the speed recorded
is less than ten miles per hour in excess of the legal speed limit. This
paragraph shall not apply to evidence obtained through the use of
devices authorized by paragraph (3) within a school zone"

So what were you saying about knowing the

law?

(Ouch.
Vinnie S.)

Ouch , Exactly


Yea, al that fanny patting you do with him...hehe.

Pennsy isn't big on speed enforcement

anyhow.



An interesting opinion which no one cares *what* you may mean by it, so
save trying to explain whta you "meant" by it at a later date.

Pennsy is not a radar stste by any means


You are completely daft. Every single State Police Officer with a patrol
unit is equipped with them.

most towns dont even have them


Gee,,,that's because only State Cops are permitted to have them in Pa.

they use the time and distance (vascar)

method. which is why they probably have 6

mph relief


Ony the State Cops *don't* have any required "mph relief" in regards to
the State's maximum posted speed limits on te interstates,,you know,,the
place where the State Cops patrol.
Oh,,and there will not be any "required mph relief" no matter *what*
name you choose to post under, Dave.

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:9248-421229BB-449
@storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net:
That your position still doesn't understand that Pa has no law or rule,
written or otherwise, requiring officers to give you a window of ANY
speed when in excess of the state speed limit.



They most certainly do, all states have a

window, it is actually for equipment error etc.



Show the statute.

If

a speed limit is posted at 35 they will not write

you until you pass the prescribed min over the
limit,


Show the statute.


some officers will be more leinent,


Now you are speaking discretion and not a rule. Which is it you are
claiming?

but the letter is none write you for going 1 mph
over speed limit.

That's bull****. Give the cop a difficult time after he pulled you over
for going a few miles over the speed limit and see if you don't get a
ticket. The outcome of your court appearance is irelevant at this point.
If a RULE existed, as you claim, that he (th cop) may NOT write you up
for such, you wouldn't be pulled over in the first place.

They know the reliability and accuracy of the

radar wont hold up in court.

Actually, the technology today is very accurate and can pinpoint a
single car in a bunch of traffic, In addition, the radar guns are
required to be recalibrated EVERY shift in Pa.


If the radars accuracy is +/- 2 mph they

wont/cant write you at 1 mph over. pretty basic
concept.


There you go again. Your posting name changes but your echo is
undeniable.

My goodness,,the concept is simple, Davie. Helicopter watches traffic
below..clocks how long it takes cars to get from point A (marked by
paint on highway) to point B (also marked by paint on highway). Taaa
daa..VASCAR.

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:6287-4213D1C6-678 @storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net:
My goodness,,the concept is simple, Davie. Helicopter watches traffic
below..clocks how long it takes cars to get from point A (marked by
paint on highway) to point B (also marked by paint on highway). Taaa
daa..VASCAR.

They very rarely use a helicopter for traffic

enforcement

Perhaps in your neck of the woods, they do not, but in the larger cities
and metropolis', they most certainly do.

vascar is ran in the police cars.


And from the air.

They dont have the budget for using

helicopters for speed enforcement.


Which State Police budget are you referring?

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:6288-4213CF9E-244 @storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net:
Pennsy is not a radar stste by any means

You are completely daft. Every single State
Police Officer with a patrol unit is equipped
with them.

You are completly a fool, The state Police are

the only ones who use radar in the state,

no

town's or cities or municipalties, deputies none
use radar. That means it is not a radar state.


By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong.
A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state
is void of radar.

(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11820-4214ABD6-877
@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:

By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong.
A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state
is void of radar.

Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania, i didnt
say they were devoid of radar or a non radar state. I said penns was not a
radar state by any means there are states that use radar in every town
municipality and boro, penns is not one of them, that means they are not
really a "radar state" that is not thier primary means of speed
enforcement. Do the state police use em sure do, but there are more towns
and municipalities than state police by a large stretch hence it is not
really a radar state... Now go twisty some more words around since you dont
understand.

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong.
A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state
is void of radar.

Mine and any company who proposes to sell

radar to Pennsylvania,


Oh, a marketing ploy certainly makes it official, then.

i didnt say they were devoid of radar or a non

radar state.



That IS exactly what the phrase you invoked
means.

I said penns was not a radar state by any

means there are states that use radar in every
town municipality and boro, penns is not one

of them, that means they are not really a

"radar state" that is not thier primary means of

speed enforcement. Do the state police use

em sure do, but there are more towns and

municipalities than state police by a large

stretch hence it is not really a radar state...

Now go twisty some more words around since
you dont understand.


You invoke a PR department's marketing strategy and permit it to define
legalities for you,,,and tell another they don't understand the law.
Great show!

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:

By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong.
A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state
is void of radar.

Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania

Is that what you do for a living, George?

--
http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month

On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote:

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:

By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong.
A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the state
is void of radar.

Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania

Is that what you do for a living, George?


Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

Dave Hall wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote:

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:

By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong.
A non-radar state would mean just what the phrase connotates: the
state is void of radar.

Mine and any company who proposes to sell radar to Pennsylvania

Is that what you do for a living, George?

Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me......

George posts as you.

--
http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month