On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:43:12 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

NNTP-Posting-Date: ** Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:35pm (EST-1) Group:
** rec.radio.cb Subject: ** Help on SSB failure From: **
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: ** Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: ** yes Date: **
Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:35pm (EST-1) X-Trace: **
sv3-HC1j8Vv/jVwPzcgvGIf+b0vP7PFV6/KwoBnKRsF1V9GieDDdXBHsVNFgQXoJGT84ZPLR6LdGRVIgS2h! fcpRNHi0Vir7r9bxfyBjiPBo0BsCh+AwlJZYLdiUwOC2M8xLOh UM7+NDwmt87cqbJCno
X-Complaints-To: ** X-DMCA-Complaints-To: **
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: ** Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: ** Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: ** 1.3.31
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:11822-4214B65C-63 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
helicopter.
Called a bear-in-the-air. Of course, if you left the cave of despair
once every few years, you would be clued in.

Yeah, bear in the Air went out with the

smokies in 1976 after the realease of Convoy.

so did traffic enforcement with helicopters.


Just like David Hall Jr., you are stuck in a time warp. Your ignorance
is limited by your own personal experiences.

Wait, I thought he WAS me?

Make up your "mind".

Dave
"Sandbagger"

NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:40pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0
Thu, Feb 17, 2005, 1:40pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-hg3z8lBKhgZgcJIsqEK3KwOIGYxDBvVVDQQ0SCFqIbLfwGgu1U yjT6sU7Hwh2fxdQWRXuC=
1hZacPTqR!a7fOi9j7UcJ3orlgK0hxdBT9aI/MOeEsSi7n++74BaKrdbnTzA/70ZXzcePGZLKZ=
wT/v
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31
Steveo wrote in news:20050217132915.019
:
Dave Hall wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 17:22:50 GMT, Steveo wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:11820-4214ABD6-877 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
Pa is a non-radar state

By whose definition? Yours? It's wrong.
A non-radar state would mean just what the
phrase connotates: the state is void of radar.

Mine and any company who proposes to sell

radar to Pennsylvania


So you not only cite a marketing team as your reference to the law, you
insist on it remaining as such.

(Is that what you do for a living, George?)

Careful Steveo. Twisty thinks he's me......

(shrug) You said yourself and David T. Hall Jr. conspired in email for
you to forge him in this group, in order to have me think you are he. In
addition to affirming how much I lord over you each of you, it also
illustrates the both of you will use the group as your own personal
toilet as a means to harass.

(George posts as you. )

Only after tipsy called me Dave,


That's no jusification. You called Frank me before any of this took
place. Hypocrite.

so lets see who am

Both of you are blights to amateur radio.

NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:09pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0
Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:09pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-s5MR9iS42H5Rpju5wWx8QCqK1f8WHuQFo1J8iPGbqYJLjeeiS3 0OevVgfv4ZVXh/s9RQOC=
/N2HLrtko!CGJ0x9GXSbvM9b1bUETSeseZYKePtm1TYjgpfZWbA d8MRQ6engujoMFS5JEoQKuU=
JGel
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:6287-4216006E-1021 @storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net:
So you not only cite a marketing team as your reference to the law, you
insist on it remaining as such.

I did not reference any marketing team's,


Is your memory that poor? You invoked an un-named company that has a
financial interest in marketing their product as an answer to my inquiry
as to WHO told you that Pa. was a non-radar state, as you have claimed.
If the PR department of that company didn't come up with the term and
defninition, just what part of the company would you hazard, did? The
janitor?

nor was my reference regarding any law.


As long as we understand each other that your un-named company applying
their own definition to a "non-radar state" to include a state that
indeed utilizes radar, is but a single person's opinion.

It was a general comment and statement that

is known throught the industry,


I can accept the term is prevalent, but the definition can not
encompasses states who do employ radar, no matter who claims it.


Pa is not really a radar state, now you can sit

here and try to decipher my meaning.


Ha,,,now, it's not "really" a radar state.
Off you go now, to redefine what you "really' meant when you said "Pa is
not a radar state."


You are a nobody, ur opinion and what you

say doesn't matter.

Tut-tut,,get over your personal anger that is the cause of so much vile
and venom spewing forth from your thrashed psyche and twisted soul.

I have spoken with more Leo agencies and

people in the field who know what is what,


Your personal experiences are irrelavant.

you on the other hand is a usenet blowhard

who's only goal is to get under peoples skin

with your assinine replies.

My goodness, coming from one who has called each and every participant
in this group (except, for David T. Hall, Jr, of course) a homosexual at
one time or another, your thoughts and warm wishes will certainly be
filed appropriately.


So how many more times will you call me

dave Hall?

How many more times will you forge him?

you dumb jackass.

The mother issue has you beside yourself.

NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:59pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Help on SSB failure From: =A0=A0
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0
Fri, Feb 18, 2005, 4:59pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-HisBmaR3wCudPMWR5A2QhKgISyf0O/Fhyndggi5CJATdB9tWcl/RVWUB4oaAOjum6C1zAZ=
lakA4ktCx!NDgzjDDfJryt3yFMKvaXV7n2Om2XQmPSHxWGNPVt zB2MWN0E7Pmzx9ZiCw72kJfu=
TjxK
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:11821-4214AD53-
:
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:6288-4213CF9E-244 @storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net: most towns dont
even have them
Gee,,,that's because only State Cops are permitted to have them in Pa.

Gee, then that makes pennsy not really a

radar state


Here you are redefining what you "really" meant. Now you are
back-pedaling with "Pa is not REALLY a radar state". LMAO, Again,,if it
was a non-radar state, radar would not be implemented by the
authorities. In fact, you are the only one I have ever heard ue the term
"non-radar" state when the state does in fact, use radar. Can you cite a
single source where you took this phrase from? Perhaps a link or provide
for it?

Any idea how many tropers and police officers
are in Pa, Ill bet one county in Florida alone

has more radar than the whole state of PA.

The Department has about 540 Decatur

Genesis Handheld radar units. The

Department also has about 250 other radar

units made by a different manufacturer.

http://www.psp.state.pa.us/psp/cwp/view.asp?

A=3D3&Q=3D172084&tx=3D1


Absent is a date, or a reference to what department...it could be a
single state polic department in any number of counties in Pa..but as an
always trusting type guy, I'll go ahead and give you the benefit of the
doubt and assume (against my better judgement) that the entire state
police department of Pa has only the amount of radar detectors you
claim. One would also assume, the department feels it adequate for the
amount of roads they must cover, or they would have more, with all the
money being poured into the coffers of domestic agencies, post-911. It
all boils down to the state police department being equipped with radar,
which results in claiming "Pa is a non-radar state", being incorrect.
Now, surely you aren't going to invoke the (limited?) number of radar
units in the state, as the criteria for determining your definition of
a non-radar state,this late in the thread, are you? David T. Hall Jr.
did the same exact thing when it was demonstrated he fails to abide by
his own invoked criteria for determining what he holds as a federal
criminal. Then again, several people have illustrated his failure to
hold himself to his own standards.