| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#33
April 27th 05, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... "U Know Who" wrote in news:6TCbe.43676$hu5.16593 @tornado.texas.rr.com: "itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... Frank Gilliland wrote in : On 25 Apr 2005 19:48:48 -0700, "Cliff" wrote in . com: If a CB radio is legal on wattage out, he doesn't have to clean up that image on any of older TV models. Older TV models are horrific in picking up 'legal transmissions' The TV/computer owner wil need to put some filters inline to take care of the problem if the CB is legal. Televisions have always had problems with CB radios because the second harmonic falls right on channel 2. But that second harmonic is supposed to be supressed (filtered) to a point where it's effect is negligible. A stock, unmodified, untweaked radio will usually not cause interference to a TV unless you mount the antenna right next to the set. The problem is the golden screwdrivers and internet techs who tweak & peak their radios for modulation and/or power without regard to the resulting increase of harmonics. Even if power is kept to the legal limit, the modulation limiter can be modified for overmodulation, and therefore cause a big increase in harmonics. This is why modification of the radio is illegal. And modification of the radio voids your authorization to use it, regardless of the RFI suseptibility of a TV. Now this is the Old Frank that I have come to know and love ... 2 thumbs up Frank!!! Awww! Ain't just the sweetest thing you've ever written? No that i ****ed your ex- old lady was better. More power to ya, bud! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
