Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On 25 Apr 2005 23:29:59 GMT, Steveo wrote in
: Frank Gilliland wrote: On 25 Apr 2005 23:22:15 GMT, Steveo wrote in : Frank Gilliland wrote: Probably true, assuming the person's interest in radio is narrow enough to fall within the limitations of the CB and/or the freeloader band. Pass the bar rag, Frank. I have some clean up to do. Spontaneous vomiting? or did you just spill your milk? None of those. I'm pondering faking a trip with mapquest. Still sore about that, huh? Oh well. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Lancer wrote:
On 25 Apr 2005 23:01:39 GMT, Steveo wrote: Lancer wrote: I thought freeband was from 26.000 MHz up to channel 1, 26.965 MHz, and from above channel 40, 27.405 MHz, to the edge of the 10 Meter ham band, 28.000 MHz. What does that have to do with Ham radio spectrum use? Quit doing so much thinking, you're going to hurt yourself... That's right, Lancer. Although I'd suggest a little caution going down the basement steps... 27.4 to 27.9 is worry free. LOL! Right now I'm staying away from basement steps... ME too. The better half has a honey-do list on the chalk board that's next to my tombstone down there! (also next to the pool table) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 25 Apr 2005 23:29:59 GMT, Steveo wrote in Pass the bar rag, Frank. I have some clean up to do. Spontaneous vomiting? or did you just spill your milk? None of those. I'm pondering faking a trip with mapquest. Still sore about that, huh? Oh well. Not at all. I have trouble with fence straddlers tho. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On 25 Apr 2005 23:36:02 GMT, Steveo wrote in
: Frank Gilliland wrote: On 25 Apr 2005 23:29:59 GMT, Steveo wrote in Pass the bar rag, Frank. I have some clean up to do. Spontaneous vomiting? or did you just spill your milk? None of those. I'm pondering faking a trip with mapquest. Still sore about that, huh? Oh well. Not at all. I have trouble with fence straddlers tho. ........huh? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 25 Apr 2005 23:36:02 GMT, Steveo wrote in : Frank Gilliland wrote: On 25 Apr 2005 23:29:59 GMT, Steveo wrote in Pass the bar rag, Frank. I have some clean up to do. Spontaneous vomiting? or did you just spill your milk? None of those. I'm pondering faking a trip with mapquest. Still sore about that, huh? Oh well. Not at all. I have trouble with fence straddlers tho. .......huh? Never mind it all, Frank. I have no problem with you. I amz' what I amz'. ($1-popeye) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Now here is the matter in question, "Whether people should design the radio
to fit them--or, if the people should be designed to fit the radio?" If you look at ham radio it is just un-progressive. If you can't see that--get new glasses! The world is passing them by and they are becomming a road block to innovation... all for the sport of their hobby... You are correct, NOT all hams are like this, I personally know of two who are not--and I am one of them... (OK, there are a few more who don't think themselves "radio Gods" and seek to have all non-hams placed in restraints...) However, I am not here to worship innovative hams anymore than the others... but, the ("others") ones with self-serving nature, and control freak attitude are at need of repair and an attitude adjustment... Anyway, I think most will agree this needs to be brought out in the light of day and examined and discussed. People need to be aware that a lot of their radio spectrum is being used just to give a chosen few some hobby privilages... in fact, write your congressman about this and complain!!! And, you don't think there are "bootlegger hams?" Ones with LARGE-multi-kilowatt linears? Ones who chat with citizens of other countries on freqs not allowed by this country? THINK AGAIN! The hams are like the gays, a few loud voices are controlling laws which affect us all! This is simply un-called for and unnecessary... Warmest regards, John "Lancer" wrote in message ews.com... On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:48:23 -0700, "John Smith" wrote: Lancer: I only wish you were correct. Hams are a tight-knit group which looks down on all other radio-users, with the possible exception of gov't. Get to know some hams in your area, I think you will find a common "control freak" nature amongst them. If even another ham suggests possible changes to their ancient methods they "black ball" him/her. Most of all their activities center around a "good ole boys rationale." You have to meet and participate with them to see just how deep this runs... Get your ham license!!! But, play along with them, make it a mission to study and learn about them... I think you will be back to freeband/"Chicken Band", but you will have a greater appreciation of radio on these bands! Regards, John John, I think you are making to much of a generalization about hams. There are a lot iin this group, and so far no one has jumped on you about "freebanding" Some of the attitude real or not is from what a sewer CB has become. After all , look what you guys have done with the legal frequencies you were given. Why should you get any additional spectrum to trash up... You get the idea? Both groups have their trouble makers, I just don't see the vast majority as you describe.. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"John Smith" wrote:
If you look at ham radio it is just un-progressive. If you can't see that--get new glasses! Newbie clue: don't be ripping hams here. Move on. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:44:42 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote in : Err; I have been known to bounce around a bit... You have done moon-bounce with a CB? Right. I ain't no musician and don't like 'em much (but like the rock n' roll music!) And, anyone who taps code and fancies himself a muscian needs a three-day observation! Where did that come from? I said nothing about musicians. CCW may be an abbreviation for a band, but I was referring to Coherent CW which is a slow type of Morse code used for weak-signal work. I am leery of anything circling this planet (ya never know, may be aliens whom crawled out of mud puddles!) Then you should probably avoid cell-phones and long-distance carriers, since most of them use satellites. And television is a no-no because most of their feeds come the same route. Disregard weather forcasts based on GEOS photos. In fact, just browsing the net can use a large number of satellites in a short amount of time. But on the flip side, those CIA spy satellites sure don't seem to work worth a damn..... must be because of alien interference, huh? I tend to shy away from pseudo-governmental organizations--and the boys who like to wear the little uniforms, patches, badges and hats and play games... Then you have a problem with the Shriners as well as most professional sports organizations. etc, etc,... I still like the boy scouts, apple pie, Benjamin Franklin, the miltia--and wish every town and city had one--complete with radios--etc... ......um, ok. So? If you think gov't is the answer and it is going to save you--think again... it will be the same way as when we began this country, there will be a government which IS the problem... it will be "We the people..." who provide the cure... Oh great, another anarchist. I have something people have forgotten about, faith in my neighbors and countrymen, and a knowledge of how average men rise to meet great challenges, undertakings and disasters--again, our nation is a firm lesson in this--why does everyone keep thinking we are "the great civilization?" The Romans thought that yanno? A good lesson is Germany, it was the highly educated who helped Hitler the most--the doctors, judges, lawyers, etc... carried out his plans... without them, Hitler was nobody... they thought themselves "special" and "entitled", thank God they were shown different... it is not my education which makes me a valuable neighbor--it is my standing on the shoulders of my forefathers... Yet you spit on their graves by encouraging lawlessness. If ever we face disaster, it will be more likely for some unheard of wino or schmuck or just everyday-Joe to rise to meet the occasion than a gov't entity... Seems to me that we have had plenty of disasters over the years. And if I recall, the government was able to handle each and every one of them..... more or less. But what does that have to do with the topic? but politicians will be there to take the credit, hide the real heroes, and pick plastic heroes who will support their campaigns... no, it never changes, it is a vicious circle... Nothing has changed human nature... only some men have begun to dream in fantasy colored pictures again, and once again we are in danger... You have issues. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie, nah, if I haven't been around the block with this bunch, then it was
another one which looked so much alike--might as well have been 'em... I claim what I am saying is truth--if it isn't then tell me how so, we can be debate, we can argue--in the end, all which matters is the truth--let the chips fall where they might... I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Regards, John "Steveo" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote: If you look at ham radio it is just un-progressive. If you can't see that--get new glasses! Newbie clue: don't be ripping hams here. Move on. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On 26 Apr 2005 01:42:09 GMT, Steveo wrote:
"John Smith" wrote: If you look at ham radio it is just un-progressive. If you can't see that--get new glasses! Newbie clue: don't be ripping hams here. Move on. Hey Moped, I have to delay buying my ham gear. I took the dog to the vet because of ongoing skin allergies. The blood test was $375. That didn't include the steroid spray and office visit. Hopefully, they can determine what the hell he is allegeric to. I didn't have a choice. I have spent a ton of money on this problem already, and figured rather than relieving symtoms, I need to find out the cause and stop it. I am going to try and hang the Imax this weekend, weather permitting. Vinnie S. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|