Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 May 2005 08:30:19 -0400, Dave Hall
wrote in : snip I am hardly a religious zealot. I don't even go to church. I am not even a practicing Christian. But I do believe in a "God" and I do believe in intelligent design, and I believe in keeping morality as a guide to responsible social behavior. Another excellent book you should read: "The Golden Bough" by James George Frazer. I think it should be required reading for any sociology class. I am for preserving proven tradition It's not the responsibility of the government to "preserve tradition" no matter how much you would like the government to shoulder that repsponsibility for you. and do not believe that change is automatically a good thing. Neither do I. But change, good or bad, -is- inevitable (or haven't you looked up the word yet?). I am also a political conservative (As are you IIRC), and tend to favor smaller government, personal responsibility and accountability, a free market I agree 100%. and a strong morality based system of law and order in order to punish those who cannot act properly in a civilized society. The only problem I have with that is your source of "morality". The First Amendment prohibits any law that favors any specific religion, therefore religion cannot be the source of morality. Thus, society must define the lines of morality. If the majority of society derive their moral values from religion that's fine -- but remember that the framers of this country were mostly Christians, yet felt it was a moral imperative to protect the freedom of everyone to practice their own religious faith, -and- to protect the government from imposing religion by law. Now if you had a sociological foundation for your argument against gay marriage I might even agree, but you don't. And since society is constantly changing (as it inevitably does), morality will change, and so will the laws based on morality. But what you -still- don't seem to accept is that -you- are not forced to change your religion based upon changes in society -- that's your Constitutional right. You may not like those changes, but as you have stated many times before, the government can't make everyone happy. The arguments between Frank, Twisty and I are much more complex than a simple ideological disagreement. Twisty is twisty. His actions need no further explanation. Frank has been stung ever since I admitted that I supported Bush. A revelation that seems to have affected him personally. Frank has since been trying to prove that support of Bush (and republicans in general) is wrong based solely on his subjective opinion that only an idiot would support him so, consequently, he has been since trying to prove that I'm that idiot. You have that a little mixed up, Dave. You -are- an idiot, but that's beside the point; I don't care if you support Bush or not -- but your reasons for supporting him are based on ignorance, propaganda, and flat-out lies, many of which you perpetrate yourself just because you don't like being proved wrong. And I don't care if you are Republican or Democrat since both parties are just about equally corrupt, as I have stated on more than one occasion (and you evidently -still- can't (or won't) understand). So if you are going to tell the story then tell the -correct- story, not just your biased version of it. But during the course of the ensuing "debates", Frank has revealed much about his personality, and has given me an insight into his own inner demons. I can now see why he and Twisty have found common ground. They both have a profound distrust of corporations and any form of "the establishment". And, if their level of knowledge and education is as they claim, they are both underachievers. Frank, who once claimed to teach college courses, and claims to hold a BS degree in engineering, working as a bartender. Twisty, who claims to be well versed in law, and an "accomplished" writer, takes snowbirds out to fish on a charter boat, and can't even afford a real computer. No wonder he hides behind an anonymous pseudonym. Twisty and I have common ground now only because I was forced to admit that he was right regarding Bush. Beyond that, we still have strong ideological differences. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that the differences between Twisty and myself are greater than the differences between you and me. If you can just get past your presumptive nature and think for yourself instead of taking the temporally lazy route by relying on those that prey on emotional weaknesses then we probably wouldn't have any arguments at all. One of these days you may realize that the mental effort you use to defend your ignorance is far greater than if you spent your time and energy digging for subjective facts and forming your own -independent- opinions. Or maybe not. It had been fun from a purely psychological standpoint. But I am beginning to tire of this almost constant off-topic banter. I am actually longing for the days when we talked about amplifiers and mods to radios. I never guessed that a simple ideological disagreement would turn into several years worth of trash talking. You can't help yourself. You hate to be proved wrong because it shatters your self-image as a morally-motivated person (it's that "perception-window" thing I mentioned earlier -- and the offer for -that- book still stands, too). When faced with the truth that your motivations are generally selfish (and frequently prejudicial), it creates emotional conflict with what you have chosen as your "core beliefs". Therefore, you seek validation for your lame justifications on Usenet. You can't give up arguing these issues or your brain would explode into a mushroom-cloud of hypocrisy. Besides, you have claimed to be tired of this bickering many, many times. You have also threatened to give it up many, many times. Each time you come right back here defending the same bogus arguments because you can't control yourself. And this time is no different. But feel free to take a long sabbatical. Then come back and answer some of the pending questions that you have been avoiding for several months -- maybe a fresh mind will let you fabricate some new lies and excuses. I hope so because your constant repitition of the old ones are getting to be monotonous. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|