Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio
»
CB
>
ATTN: I AmnotGeorgeBush,tell us about spread spectrum 11 meter cb radios.
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
19
May 5th 05, 07:23 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
Posts: n/a
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400,
(I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From:
(Freeband=A0sucks)
where can we find one?
-
The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )
I've been watching this topic with some
interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is
the direct sequencing method.
Yea,,that's what i meant when I said "digital" sequencing.
Frequency
hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a
wideband and barely distinguishable SS
system.
Yea,,I guess it could be seen that way,,,but,,why couldn't the
technology be programmed to hop "wider" (for lack of a better term at
the moment)?
Direct sequence is also more secure than FH.
I'm not up on the latest encryption technique regrading this technology,
but take your word for it. But,,,why would a direct sequence (definite
pattern) be more secire than a random pattern?
Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered
spread spectrum in today's marketplace.
Yep it is.
As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First
off, there are no commercial CB radios made
with this technology.
I never said there was. I said the technology was there and blew a
gasket in a certain poster's gray matter and now he is all wrapped up in
himself blathering incoherently about a cb radio when I referred the
freeband.
Even hams have been slow to embrace it.
That's not to say that enterprising
experimenters have not played with it on 11
.meters.
BINGO!
Utilizing cordless phones and transverters
might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there
may be a few that have. But it's hardly in
widespread use.
Agreed.
Dave
."Sandbagger"
n3cvj
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
10:19 AM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks