Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 11th 05, 11:20 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
The Magnum
 
Posts: n/a
Default since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in effect, rules it is.

wrote in message
oups.com...
sorry about the double posting. I don't know how that happened.
Regarding my post, I just remembered, isn't there a federal law that is
supposed to exempt any ham radio operators from any local or state laws
that forbid the use of ham radios while mobile?

And yet, the ham radio operator is still counted as "guilty" by the
judge for using his ham radio while mobile.


Here in blighty it isnt illegal to use one while driving UNLESS..... you
show signs of careless driving or lack of proper control of your vehical to
which then the cb/amateur radio will be used as the cause of your clumsiness
and you will be prosecuted.

Or was this a federal judge who ruled that it was against the law for
the ham radio operator to use his mobile ham radio while he is mobile?

which, in effect, also makes using mobile cb radios against the law
while mobile.

going by the reasoning the judge gave about the ham radios.


To describe a cell phone as the same or near enough the same as a CB shows
the Judges lack of understanding in this case. Cell phones have to be held
to the ear to talk and listed rendering one hand useless for driving as its
held to the head during the entire call(for god sake if your driving and
have a headache dont hold your head or you will be pulled over thinking your
on a cell phone) whereas CB/Amateur hand mics are only used when
transmitting and can be rested on the steering wheel or kept to one side of
the hand while operating the other functions of the car. (indicators, gear
lever etc) so basically the Judge is a dick and the guys defence was bloody
useless. Like i said earlier though if you show signs of losing control of
your vehical or careless driving you will be prosicuted and the CB will be
cited as the reason for your incompetance.

I guess we all have to start looking for base cb radios now, unless you
already have one.


Theres always the hands free option the same as mobile phones. As far as i
know theres no law against using these, in the phones case your not meant to
touch the phone to recieve or end calls with your hand otherwise you should
be fine. Mind you thats in the UK but with all the laws we have im sure the
US cant be worse.... or can it??

But what's the use if you're trying to stay in contact with someone who
is mobile while you're at home or vice versa?


Pull over in a safe area to take the call or just listen? Personally as long
as you are competent in talking on a mic while driving and you dont go into
another world and lose concentration i wouldnt worry too much about it.

Regards,
Graham
--
_._. _... ._. ._ _.. .. _ _ _

Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life...

73's - Graham (www.open-channel.co.uk)


  #4   Report Post  
Old December 18th 05, 10:34 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
 
Posts: n/a
Default since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in...

What the poster claims occurred to him is bull****.

no it isn't.

It never happened.


Yes it did.

His cut and paste from the arrl may be the only credible thing he
posted, ever. You're responding to N8WWM. Google "152.163" (first part
of his ip#) in this group. 'Nuff said.

Nuff said indeed. Thanks for that.

Regards,
Graham


I am the original poster who cut and pasted the ARRL article in here. I
am not N8WWM and I was never N8WWM.

  #5   Report Post  
Old December 19th 05, 04:37 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
I AmnotGeorgeBush
 
Posts: n/a
Default since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge,in...

From: ** Group: ** rec.radio.cb
Subject: ** since when is using a cb against the law in the
U.S.?Judge, in... Date: ** Sun, Dec 18, 2005, 2:34am (EST-3)
Organization: **
http://groups.google.com X-Trace: **
posting.google.com 1134902047 4848 127.0.0.1 (18 Dec 2005 10:34:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ** NNTP-Posting-Date:
** Sun, Dec 18, 2005, 10:34am (EST+5) User-Agent: ** G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: ** Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; CS 2000 6.0;
Wal-Mart Connect 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR
1.0.3705),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: ** HTTP/1.1 Turboweb
[mtc-tb104 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0 cache-mtc-ac05.proxy.aol.com[400C7486]
(Traffic-Server/5.4.0 [uScM]) Complaints-To: **
Injection-Info: **
f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.12.116.134;
posting-account=Wh344g0AAADRbO_1pDscgVTGFHP3trFO
What the poster claims occurred to him is bull****.

no it isn't.


Yes it is.
It never happened.

Yes it did.


His cut and paste from the arrl may be the only credible thing he
posted, ever. You're responding to N8WWM. Google "152.163" (first part
of his ip#) in this group. 'Nuff said.

(Nuff said indeed. Thanks for that.
Regards,
Graham )

I am the original poster who cut and pasted


the ARRL article in here.



But of course you are. Google "152.163" and "64.12" in this group. The
beauty of google posterity is wonderful, is it not?


I am not N8WWM and I was never N8WWM.


You're the scumbag that posts under both ip #s responsible for major
hate and self-loathing. Sorry to make you feel so small of yourself
again.



  #6   Report Post  
Old December 12th 05, 11:31 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
moparholic at hotmail dot com is a sissy
 
Posts: n/a
Default since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in ...

look at the IP numbnuts. I know you are stoopid, but how stupid can you
be? The answer grows daily.

  #7   Report Post  
Old December 13th 05, 05:07 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
Nicolai Carpathia
 
Posts: n/a
Default since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in...

Doug Adair, felonious cretin, spawned creature of sin, judged and spake
of evil wanton and sinful desire with:

look at the IP numbnuts.


Path:
g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Subject: since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in
effect, rules it is.
Date: 11 Dec 2005 01:40:13 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 56
Message-ID: .com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.163.100.134


Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1134294016 21970 127.0.0.1 (11 Dec 2005
09:40:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; CS 2000 6.0;
Wal-Mart Connect 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR
1.0.3705),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [rtc-tf103 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0
cache-rtc-ac05.proxy.aol.com[98A36486] (Traffic-Server/5.4.0 [uScM])
Complaints-To:

Injection-Info: g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=152.163.100.134;
**
_
N8WWM, miscreant of Babylon who ejaculate forth disease, hath been
righteously received. Borne of he:

I know you are


stoopid




  #8   Report Post  
Old December 18th 05, 10:43 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
 
Posts: n/a
Default since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in ...

look at the IP numbnuts. I know you are stoopid, but how stupid can
you
be? The answer grows daily

I am NOT who you claim I am.

At least, I'm not if you're claiming that I'm N8WWM.

  #10   Report Post  
Old December 18th 05, 10:40 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
 
Posts: n/a
Default since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in ...

What the poster claims occurred to him is bull****. It never happened.
His cut and paste from the arrl may be the only credible thing he
posted, ever. You're responding to N8WWM. Google "152.163" (first part
of his ip#) in this group. 'Nuff said


I am the original poster. And as far as I remember, that was my very
first post in this cb newsgroup ever.

And I am definitely NOT N8WWM. And I definitely was NEVER EVER N8WWM.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
K1MAN The crap has hit the fan. Dan/W4NTI Policy 11 June 21st 05 05:28 AM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
a great read Happy camper CB 1 November 19th 04 02:51 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
The main problem with Ham radio... Observer Policy 59 February 1st 04 07:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017