Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... sorry about the double posting. I don't know how that happened. Regarding my post, I just remembered, isn't there a federal law that is supposed to exempt any ham radio operators from any local or state laws that forbid the use of ham radios while mobile? And yet, the ham radio operator is still counted as "guilty" by the judge for using his ham radio while mobile. Here in blighty it isnt illegal to use one while driving UNLESS..... you show signs of careless driving or lack of proper control of your vehical to which then the cb/amateur radio will be used as the cause of your clumsiness and you will be prosecuted. Or was this a federal judge who ruled that it was against the law for the ham radio operator to use his mobile ham radio while he is mobile? which, in effect, also makes using mobile cb radios against the law while mobile. going by the reasoning the judge gave about the ham radios. To describe a cell phone as the same or near enough the same as a CB shows the Judges lack of understanding in this case. Cell phones have to be held to the ear to talk and listed rendering one hand useless for driving as its held to the head during the entire call(for god sake if your driving and have a headache dont hold your head or you will be pulled over thinking your on a cell phone) whereas CB/Amateur hand mics are only used when transmitting and can be rested on the steering wheel or kept to one side of the hand while operating the other functions of the car. (indicators, gear lever etc) so basically the Judge is a dick and the guys defence was bloody useless. Like i said earlier though if you show signs of losing control of your vehical or careless driving you will be prosicuted and the CB will be cited as the reason for your incompetance. I guess we all have to start looking for base cb radios now, unless you already have one. Theres always the hands free option the same as mobile phones. As far as i know theres no law against using these, in the phones case your not meant to touch the phone to recieve or end calls with your hand otherwise you should be fine. Mind you thats in the UK but with all the laws we have im sure the US cant be worse.... or can it?? But what's the use if you're trying to stay in contact with someone who is mobile while you're at home or vice versa? Pull over in a safe area to take the call or just listen? Personally as long as you are competent in talking on a mic while driving and you dont go into another world and lose concentration i wouldnt worry too much about it. Regards, Graham -- _._. _... ._. ._ _.. .. _ _ _ Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life... 73's - Graham (www.open-channel.co.uk) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What the poster claims occurred to him is bull****.
no it isn't. It never happened. Yes it did. His cut and paste from the arrl may be the only credible thing he posted, ever. You're responding to N8WWM. Google "152.163" (first part of his ip#) in this group. 'Nuff said. Nuff said indeed. Thanks for that. Regards, Graham I am the original poster who cut and pasted the ARRL article in here. I am not N8WWM and I was never N8WWM. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: ** Group: ** rec.radio.cb
Subject: ** since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in... Date: ** Sun, Dec 18, 2005, 2:34am (EST-3) Organization: ** http://groups.google.com X-Trace: ** posting.google.com 1134902047 4848 127.0.0.1 (18 Dec 2005 10:34:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: ** NNTP-Posting-Date: ** Sun, Dec 18, 2005, 10:34am (EST+5) User-Agent: ** G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: ** Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; CS 2000 6.0; Wal-Mart Connect 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: ** HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [mtc-tb104 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0 cache-mtc-ac05.proxy.aol.com[400C7486] (Traffic-Server/5.4.0 [uScM]) Complaints-To: ** Injection-Info: ** f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.12.116.134; posting-account=Wh344g0AAADRbO_1pDscgVTGFHP3trFO What the poster claims occurred to him is bull****. no it isn't. Yes it is. It never happened. Yes it did. His cut and paste from the arrl may be the only credible thing he posted, ever. You're responding to N8WWM. Google "152.163" (first part of his ip#) in this group. 'Nuff said. (Nuff said indeed. Thanks for that. Regards, Graham ) I am the original poster who cut and pasted the ARRL article in here. But of course you are. Google "152.163" and "64.12" in this group. The beauty of google posterity is wonderful, is it not? I am not N8WWM and I was never N8WWM. You're the scumbag that posts under both ip #s responsible for major hate and self-loathing. Sorry to make you feel so small of yourself again. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
look at the IP numbnuts. I know you are stoopid, but how stupid can you
be? The answer grows daily. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Adair, felonious cretin, spawned creature of sin, judged and spake
of evil wanton and sinful desire with: look at the IP numbnuts. Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb Subject: since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in effect, rules it is. Date: 11 Dec 2005 01:40:13 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 56 Message-ID: .com NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.163.100.134 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1134294016 21970 127.0.0.1 (11 Dec 2005 09:40:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:40:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; CS 2000 6.0; Wal-Mart Connect 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [rtc-tf103 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0 cache-rtc-ac05.proxy.aol.com[98A36486] (Traffic-Server/5.4.0 [uScM]) Complaints-To: Injection-Info: g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=152.163.100.134; ** _ N8WWM, miscreant of Babylon who ejaculate forth disease, hath been righteously received. Borne of he: I know you are stoopid |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
look at the IP numbnuts. I know you are stoopid, but how stupid can
you be? The answer grows daily I am NOT who you claim I am. At least, I'm not if you're claiming that I'm N8WWM. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:27:08 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (TheĀ*Magnum) wrote in message roups.com... Here in blighty it isnt illegal to use one while driving UNLESS..... you show signs of careless driving or lack of proper control of your vehical to which then the cb/amateur radio will be used as the cause of your clumsiness and you will be prosecuted. What the poster claims occurred to him is bull****. It never happened. His cut and paste from the arrl may be the only credible thing he posted, ever. You're responding to N8WWM. Google "152.163" (first part of his ip#) in this group. 'Nuff said. Here is a link to the original article from W2JLH http://www.eham.net/articles/12676 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What the poster claims occurred to him is bull****. It never happened.
His cut and paste from the arrl may be the only credible thing he posted, ever. You're responding to N8WWM. Google "152.163" (first part of his ip#) in this group. 'Nuff said I am the original poster. And as far as I remember, that was my very first post in this cb newsgroup ever. And I am definitely NOT N8WWM. And I definitely was NEVER EVER N8WWM. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
K1MAN The crap has hit the fan. | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
The main problem with Ham radio... | Policy |