Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/09/2010 21:01, Len GM0ONX wrote:
On 24/09/2010 21:00, Yeti wrote: On 24/09/2010 19:24, Walt Davidson wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:21:15 +0100, Brian wrote: On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:20:32 -0400 Mike wrote: For what reasons would someone be "anti D-Star"? D-STAR uses a proprietary codec, that means for anyone that doesn't believe that amateur radio should use technology that forbids reverse engineering and hence interoperability with homebrew designs it's not acceptable. It is rather curious, is it not, that it's often the same people who are aggressively in favour of D-Star "because it is leading edge technology", and yet are vociferous in their opposition to DAB broadcasting "because it is no better than the existing analogue systems". Funny world. 73 de G3NYY Interesting analogy (pardon the pun) Walt. DAB doesn't work for mobile use. Neither does D-Star. You'll be getting an email from you know who! They always make me laugh. But I think he's given up now. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is | Digital | |||
Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is | Homebrew | |||
I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||
I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||
I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave |