| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian Kantor wrote:
The exact same stupidity has long crippled the advancement of the AX.25 protocol, and the APRS protocol, and nearly every other *amateur* designed protocol. Fortunately there were a couple of unused bits in the AX.25 header that were used for AX.25 v2, DAMA, and Extended Sequence numbers. But more flexibility would certainly have been welcome. AX.25's other remaining use, that of carrying tcp/ip, has also got a real problem: the minimum IPv6 packet is bigger than the maximum AX.25 packet. Oops. There is a segmentation protocol at AX.25 level (defined by Phil Karn and used in NET/NOS) that allows the segmentation of a single IP datagram over multiple AX.25 frames. With a new PID it could be used for IPv6 over AX.25. Of course, the headers of IPv4 are already considered big in the amateur packet radio world. At the datarates typically used, one wants to conserve on header size. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is | Digital | |||
| Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is | Homebrew | |||
| I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||
| I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||
| I will put my money where my mouth is !!!! | Shortwave | |||