Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 13th 03, 11:16 PM
Dick
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You would never know it by looking through their website. I see
packet radio all over the place. I have always considered TAPR to be
the "father" of today's TNC's.

Dick - W6CCD

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:50:43 GMT, "charlesb"
wrote:

Gene Story accused me of "hating" TAPR in his nastygram-post, but my
feelings about TAPR do not run that strongly. As a technical organization
that puts out kits, TAPR does a great job. What I do "hate" though, is to
see hams being confused into thinking that TAPR is a packet radio
organization when they are not.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coax length - important ? Keven Matthews Antenna 44 January 10th 04 11:48 AM
Taste this important pack from Microsoft Jerry W. O'Dell Boatanchors 2 November 15th 03 01:51 PM
Anyone have mid 1960s Spiegel catalogs? (radio history research project) K5DH Boatanchors 0 November 7th 03 01:40 PM
Important news For all webmaster,newsmaster CW Antenna 0 September 28th 03 03:06 AM
IMPORTANT! Changes to your Cable Internet Service JEEPMON Antenna 0 August 21st 03 09:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017