Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You would never know it by looking through their website. I see
packet radio all over the place. I have always considered TAPR to be the "father" of today's TNC's. Dick - W6CCD On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:50:43 GMT, "charlesb" wrote: Gene Story accused me of "hating" TAPR in his nastygram-post, but my feelings about TAPR do not run that strongly. As a technical organization that puts out kits, TAPR does a great job. What I do "hate" though, is to see hams being confused into thinking that TAPR is a packet radio organization when they are not. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coax length - important ? | Antenna | |||
Taste this important pack from Microsoft | Boatanchors | |||
Anyone have mid 1960s Spiegel catalogs? (radio history research project) | Boatanchors | |||
Important news For all webmaster,newsmaster | Antenna | |||
IMPORTANT! Changes to your Cable Internet Service | Antenna |