"Airy R Soul" wrote in message
...

"jim.gm4dhj" wrote in message
...

Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

Great name...!

James Stewart......(GM4DHJ)


Jackie Stewart (F1)

Martha Stewart (FELØN)

"Airy R Soul" wrote in message
...

"jim.gm4dhj" wrote in message
...

Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

Great name...!

James Stewart......(GM4DHJ)


Jackie Stewart (F1)

Martha Stewart (FELØN)

Steve Nosko wrote:

Could be said for the vast majority of amateur activities. It's a hobby -
an authorized way to waste time and money.

.... and obstruct far more valuable uses of radio spectrum.


Dana K6JQ

Steve Nosko wrote:

Could be said for the vast majority of amateur activities. It's a hobby -
an authorized way to waste time and money.

.... and obstruct far more valuable uses of radio spectrum.


Dana K6JQ

In article WBPqc.230$6K2.5@newsfe1-win, jim.gm4dhj says...


Come on, Jim, 6mpg from a Chevrolet Bel-Air convertible!

--
Binary Era

Cool!.........


i like porno binarys.

In article WBPqc.230$6K2.5@newsfe1-win, jim.gm4dhj says...


Come on, Jim, 6mpg from a Chevrolet Bel-Air convertible!

--
Binary Era

Cool!.........


i like porno binarys.

Walt Davidson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2004 11:01:45 -0700, Dana Myers wrote:


Steve Nosko wrote:


Could be said for the vast majority of amateur activities. It's a hobby -
an authorized way to waste time and money.

... and obstruct far more valuable uses of radio spectrum ....


.... for example, BPL.

Perhaps. Let's be honest; ham radio spectrum benefits fewer than
500,000 active hams at any given time (my estimate and probably
wildly optimistic). Unlicensed 2.4GHz users alone (meaning
cordless phones and 802.11) are probably 50x that at any given
instant.

I'm not suggesting that we should just give up ham radio
spectrum, but I am objectively observing that we're getting
far, far more value than we seem to recognize. It's like
having half of the national forests set aside for the use
of less than 1% of the population.

Dana

Walt Davidson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2004 11:01:45 -0700, Dana Myers wrote:


Steve Nosko wrote:


Could be said for the vast majority of amateur activities. It's a hobby -
an authorized way to waste time and money.

... and obstruct far more valuable uses of radio spectrum ....


.... for example, BPL.

Perhaps. Let's be honest; ham radio spectrum benefits fewer than
500,000 active hams at any given time (my estimate and probably
wildly optimistic). Unlicensed 2.4GHz users alone (meaning
cordless phones and 802.11) are probably 50x that at any given
instant.

I'm not suggesting that we should just give up ham radio
spectrum, but I am objectively observing that we're getting
far, far more value than we seem to recognize. It's like
having half of the national forests set aside for the use
of less than 1% of the population.

Dana

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 11:01:45 -0700, Dana Myers wrote:

Steve Nosko wrote:

Could be said for the vast majority of amateur activities. It's a
hobby -
an authorized way to waste time and money.

... and obstruct far more valuable uses of radio spectrum ....

.... for example, BPL.


I think obtaining Brass Pounders League is good training.

--

... Hank

http://horedson.home.att.net
http://w0rli.home.att.net

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 May 2004 11:01:45 -0700, Dana Myers wrote:

Steve Nosko wrote:

Could be said for the vast majority of amateur activities. It's a
hobby -
an authorized way to waste time and money.

... and obstruct far more valuable uses of radio spectrum ....

.... for example, BPL.


I think obtaining Brass Pounders League is good training.

--

... Hank

http://horedson.home.att.net
http://w0rli.home.att.net