Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
more proof of stevie double standard as if it were need
an_old_friend wrote: KØHB wrote: My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product. did you get stveie permission to use the word jeep that way a full posting cycle from stvei and yet Hans is allowed to make up words without a care from Stevie just more proof stevie is the Asshole of RRAP |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
More Markie Mularkie
an old friend wrote: an_old_friend wrote: KØHB wrote: My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product. did you get stveie permission to use the word jeep that way a full posting cycle from stvei and yet Hans is allowed to make up words without a care from Stevie Hans didn't "make up" any words. Every word he use can be found in any standard dictionary. just more proof stevie is the ###hole of RRAP Just more proof you're the drunken sloth of RRAP. Steve, K4YZ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
still more **** fro the asshoole of RRAP
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: an_old_friend wrote: KØHB wrote: My all-time favorite jeep (general purpose) logging program is HyperLog, but support has been discontinued, so I'm shopping for a new product. did you get stveie permission to use the word jeep that way a full posting cycle from stvei and yet Hans is allowed to make up words without a care from Stevie Hans didn't "make up" any words. Every word he use can be found in any standard dictionary. made menaing so sorry just more proof stevie is the ###hole of RRAP Just more proof you're the drunken sloth of RRAP. what proof? I don't drinnk stevie everytime you claim to "know" i dod you lie again Steve, K4YZ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
still more **** fro the asshoole of RRAP
"an old friend" wrote what proof? Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide the mathematical proof. It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three lefts make a right or 3l = r. It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r. So this would make 3l = r = -w which means that 3l = -w. Now, since left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean l = r = -w, which playing with the math gives me l = -r = w and so left is the same as wrong (yes, I could have done this in fewer steps, but I didn't feel like doing that). Now, since l = w and 3l = r that would make 3w = r. This means that three wrongs make a right. Of course, since 3 is an odd number, this situation doesn't work out with any values for r and w except 0 which would mean that r = 0 and w = 0 and l = 0, although the last one I don't really care about. This means that right and wrong are mathematically identical and so classifying things as right or wrong is pointless because both of them are the same. And since there is no difference between right and wrong, that would make ME always right and YOU always wrong and isn't that the thing that rrap is all about? 2 + 2 = 8 if you assign sufficiently large values to 2. Warmest personal wishes for the holiday, de Hans, K0HB -- If a `religion' is defined to be a system of ideas that contains unprovable statements, then Kurt Godel taught us that mathematics is not only a religion, it is the only religion that can prove itself to be one. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
still more **** fro the asshoole of RRAP
KØHB wrote: "an old friend" wrote what proof? Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide the mathematical proof. it become obvious you can't It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three lefts make a right or 3l = r. nope you are making a false stament therfore the rest of your **** needs to be flush. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
still more **** fro the asshoole of RRAP
Hello Hans,
Great logic. I found an error / probable typo in your equation. See below. Very 73 & Merry Christmas, Ace - WH2T "KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "an old friend" wrote what proof? Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide the mathematical proof. It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three lefts make a right or 3l = r. It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r. So this would make 3l = r = -w which means that 3l = -w. Now, since left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean l = r = -w, ( SHOULD READ left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean -l = r = -w, ) which playing with the math gives me l = -r = w and so left is the same as wrong (yes, I could have done this in fewer steps, but I didn't feel like doing that). Now, since l = w and 3l = r that would make 3w = r. This means that three wrongs make a right. Of course, since 3 is an odd number, this situation doesn't work out with any values for r and w except 0 which would mean that r = 0 and w = 0 and l = 0, although the last one I don't really care about. This means that right and wrong are mathematically identical and so classifying things as right or wrong is pointless because both of them are the same. And since there is no difference between right and wrong, that would make ME always right and YOU always wrong and isn't that the thing that rrap is all about? 2 + 2 = 8 if you assign sufficiently large values to 2. Warmest personal wishes for the holiday, de Hans, K0HB -- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
still more **** fro the asshoole of RRAP
"KØHB" wrote in message
It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three lefts make a right or 3l = r. It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r. You're using the variable "r" for two very different and unrelated quantites, "right" as in "starboard" and "right" as in "correct", hence turning your proof into poop. To avoid such ambiguity, instead use the equations 3l = s (s for starboard) and -w = c (c for correct). But good luck finding a relationship between s and c. Merry Christ Mass, Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
still more **** fro the asshoole of RRAP
"Jeffrey Herman" wrote You're using the variable "r" for two very different and unrelated quantites, "right" as in "starboard" and "right" as in "correct", hence turning your proof into poop. No ****, Dick Tracy! Since I have you beat by two pay grades, I guess I won't worry about your poopy attitude. de Hans, K0HB Master Chief Radioman, US Navy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
still more **** fro the asshoole of RRAP
"KØHB" wrote in message
2 + 2 = 8 if you assign sufficiently large values to 2. That relation is true for Z mod(4) (an additive algebraic group of four elements, i.e., all multiples of 4 = 0 mod(4)). Merry Christ Mass, Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Good general purpose TO-92 p-channel FET? | Homebrew | |||
Anyone Have Info on Rock County Wisconsin? | Scanner | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
General purpose whip for scanner + ham? | Scanner | |||
Can anyone explain why Technicians should be upgraded to General? | Policy |