Peter Lemken wrote:

I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to
know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea.


Really? I find online logs the worst idea ever.

Must disagree, Peter. On-line logs should dramatically cut the number of
"insurance" QSOs, thus reducing the pile-ups and giving more people a
chance.

73 ... WA7AA


--

Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly

J. McLaughlin wrote:
I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to
know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea.

Really? I find online logs the worst idea ever. It has not improved the
chances of finding and working the DX, it has merely made DXing into a
computerized checkbox game.

It has also made the DX-cluster unusable, because these days you will find
more URLs for online logs than actual DX-spots.


Peter Lemken
DF5JT
Berlin

--
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in
a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly
used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming, 'Wow, what a ride!'

I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to
know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea.
Mac N8TT

--
J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA

"Zlatko Feric" wrote in message
...
made 2 contacts, first on April 6th, second on April 7th, but neither
QSO
listed on T33 website online log???

73! 9A3MN

Back to the original statement.
The oneline log shows all my QSO's with the addition of a dupe contact on 12
meter CW.There is a note on the web page that says they are aware of dupe
qsos showing up and they are trying to correct it.For the QSO's I made,the
log is accurate.
Joe
W7KQU

Back to the original statement.
The oneline log shows all my QSO's with the addition of a dupe contact on 12
meter CW.There is a note on the web page that says they are aware of dupe
qsos showing up and they are trying to correct it.For the QSO's I made,the
log is accurate.
Joe
W7KQU