Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Dougherty wrote:
band or new mode. In contests I find a steady cluster connection to be a lifesaver (no more busted calls -- of course, you have to enter as "assisted"). Dunno, seeing some of the busted spots that show up during a contest one has to begin to wonder whether *not* having cluster constitutes "assistance"grin! -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:37:25 +0100, Walt Davidson
wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty" wrote: Looking to give DX a try. I have two attic dipoles for 20 and 40 meters. I have a ten-tec scout 555 that runs 50 watts wide open. Anyways, I am trying to find a "node" to use on my laptop but am unsure what I need. I think all I need is a 10m radio (I have an htx 10) antenna (easy enough for a dipole in the attic) and a computer. Is that true? Also, with the computer, I am aware of Telnet, but how do I access a local node? I am probably talking out of my arse, but I think it would be interesting to get it all hooked up. I use a computer logger but I think I can access the node through a phone if need be. If it sounds like I'm confused, I am. A little help will go a long way. Thanks so much I can't believe I'm reading this. Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX? How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet clusters? 73 de G3NYY I agree to some extent. Whilst the use of packet cluster can aid DXing,in my experience it can sometimes be frustrating. This is because, if a spot shows up on the cluster, then EVERYONE reading the spots will be aware of it - quite often with the inevitable pile-up. This is often difficult to break with 100W and low-height wire antennas. However, it's so much more rewarding to tune the band(s) and find a rare station calling CQ and be the first one to reply. Best 73 John, G4GOY .... 197 DXCC entities in the last 3 years |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:37:25 +0100, Walt Davidson
wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty" wrote: Looking to give DX a try. I have two attic dipoles for 20 and 40 meters. I have a ten-tec scout 555 that runs 50 watts wide open. Anyways, I am trying to find a "node" to use on my laptop but am unsure what I need. I think all I need is a 10m radio (I have an htx 10) antenna (easy enough for a dipole in the attic) and a computer. Is that true? Also, with the computer, I am aware of Telnet, but how do I access a local node? I am probably talking out of my arse, but I think it would be interesting to get it all hooked up. I use a computer logger but I think I can access the node through a phone if need be. If it sounds like I'm confused, I am. A little help will go a long way. Thanks so much I can't believe I'm reading this. Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX? How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet clusters? 73 de G3NYY I agree to some extent. Whilst the use of packet cluster can aid DXing,in my experience it can sometimes be frustrating. This is because, if a spot shows up on the cluster, then EVERYONE reading the spots will be aware of it - quite often with the inevitable pile-up. This is often difficult to break with 100W and low-height wire antennas. However, it's so much more rewarding to tune the band(s) and find a rare station calling CQ and be the first one to reply. Best 73 John, G4GOY .... 197 DXCC entities in the last 3 years |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Sir Walter -- we did it the old fashioned way - we earned it !
Listen listen listen tune tune tune and you will be the first to work the rare DX The first cluster spot is made by a DXer who performed the above -- The Anon Keyboard I doubt, therefore I might be "Walt Davidson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty" wrote: I can't believe I'm reading this. Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX? How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet clusters? 73 de G3NYY -- Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Sir Walter -- we did it the old fashioned way - we earned it !
Listen listen listen tune tune tune and you will be the first to work the rare DX The first cluster spot is made by a DXer who performed the above -- The Anon Keyboard I doubt, therefore I might be "Walt Davidson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty" wrote: I can't believe I'm reading this. Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX? How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet clusters? 73 de G3NYY -- Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Smith W9WI said :
Peter Dougherty wrote: band or new mode. In contests I find a steady cluster connection to be a lifesaver (no more busted calls -- of course, you have to enter as "assisted"). Dunno, seeing some of the busted spots that show up during a contest one has to begin to wonder whether *not* having cluster constitutes "assistance"grin! Yeah, that's true too, but on the whole between listening and seeing the spots, I've not busted one in any of the contests I've played in yet. 73 de Peter, W2IRT (ex-AB2NZ, VE3THX) Please reply to Double-you Two Eye Are Tee at Arrl.net |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Smith W9WI said :
Peter Dougherty wrote: band or new mode. In contests I find a steady cluster connection to be a lifesaver (no more busted calls -- of course, you have to enter as "assisted"). Dunno, seeing some of the busted spots that show up during a contest one has to begin to wonder whether *not* having cluster constitutes "assistance"grin! Yeah, that's true too, but on the whole between listening and seeing the spots, I've not busted one in any of the contests I've played in yet. 73 de Peter, W2IRT (ex-AB2NZ, VE3THX) Please reply to Double-you Two Eye Are Tee at Arrl.net |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the help.
ki4bbl |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the help.
ki4bbl |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Keyboard In The Wilderness" wrote in message news:awdfd.76614$hj.65646@fed1read07...
Telnet connections can be found at URL: http://www.cpcug.org/user/wfeidt/Misc/cluster.html 10M is pretty grim now as we are on the down slide of the solar cycle -- but some openings are still occurring as you will see when you connect to a packet cluster via telnet. -- The Anon Keyboard I doubt, therefore I might be About a decade ago, QST ran an article about a ham in Texas that had DX contacts --daily--, even during sunspot minima. Awful news, I guess. But even a General can get on 20M. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna for 80m and limited space | Antenna | |||
suggestions for a limited space HF antenna.. vertical or dipole | Antenna | |||
Comparative Reference to Internet Resources for Antennas and Other Related Topics | Antenna | |||
Isotron Limited Space Antennas | Dx | |||
Isotron Limited Space Antennas | Dx |