Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 11:26 PM
Martin Ewing
 
Posts: n/a
Default ic746pro: reliable enough to buy?


Hello,

I am doing market research for a new HF rig, and the Icom IC-746pro
would be a leading choice, but I'm worried about the "no transmit" and
other problems discussed at length on the web.

Of course, you take your chances whenever you get a new high-tech toy.
My question is how does the '746pro stack up against the competition in
terms of actual failure rate and reliability? This is something the
manufacturers are keenly aware of from their warranty data, but they
probably aren't going to share it with us. :-(

Most of us don't see enough different examples of enough types of rigs
to have first-hand data, and anecdotes on the net are hard to calibrate.
Given the bad press on the '746pro, I am pretty leery now, but if it's
really only a small percentage of units that are affected, I might
reconsider.

How would you decide?

73, Martin, AA6E


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 07:10 AM
Hank Oredson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Martin Ewing" wrote in message
m...

Hello,

I am doing market research for a new HF rig, and the Icom IC-746pro
would be a leading choice, but I'm worried about the "no transmit" and
other problems discussed at length on the web.

Of course, you take your chances whenever you get a new high-tech toy.
My question is how does the '746pro stack up against the competition in
terms of actual failure rate and reliability? This is something the
manufacturers are keenly aware of from their warranty data, but they
probably aren't going to share it with us. :-(

Most of us don't see enough different examples of enough types of rigs
to have first-hand data, and anecdotes on the net are hard to calibrate.
Given the bad press on the '746pro, I am pretty leery now, but if it's
really only a small percentage of units that are affected, I might
reconsider.

How would you decide?



I picked one up about 6 weeks ago, liked the price with the
recent promo. So far I rather like it :-) As far as I could determine,
the various problems you refer to occur only on earlier serial
number 746s. Check with me in a couple years about the
failure rate ...

Do I like it as well as my Kenwood TS-850?
Not sure yet. Certainly don't like the 746 less than the 850,
but I'm not yet certain I like it better.

Mostly CW DXing and SSB ragchewing.

--

... Hank

Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net


  #3   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 07:10 AM
Hank Oredson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Martin Ewing" wrote in message
m...

Hello,

I am doing market research for a new HF rig, and the Icom IC-746pro
would be a leading choice, but I'm worried about the "no transmit" and
other problems discussed at length on the web.

Of course, you take your chances whenever you get a new high-tech toy.
My question is how does the '746pro stack up against the competition in
terms of actual failure rate and reliability? This is something the
manufacturers are keenly aware of from their warranty data, but they
probably aren't going to share it with us. :-(

Most of us don't see enough different examples of enough types of rigs
to have first-hand data, and anecdotes on the net are hard to calibrate.
Given the bad press on the '746pro, I am pretty leery now, but if it's
really only a small percentage of units that are affected, I might
reconsider.

How would you decide?



I picked one up about 6 weeks ago, liked the price with the
recent promo. So far I rather like it :-) As far as I could determine,
the various problems you refer to occur only on earlier serial
number 746s. Check with me in a couple years about the
failure rate ...

Do I like it as well as my Kenwood TS-850?
Not sure yet. Certainly don't like the 746 less than the 850,
but I'm not yet certain I like it better.

Mostly CW DXing and SSB ragchewing.

--

... Hank

Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net


  #4   Report Post  
Old December 13th 03, 02:23 AM
PJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I too liked the looks of it. I joined the Yahoo group for the 746 PRO, and
I would advise you to do the same.

According to a late post on the site, serial numbers are being produced with
several modifications that should make it more reliable.

Myself, I am leaning toward a new TS 570, even though the features of the
746 are quite alluring.

I could draw parallels between this and beautiful women or fast cars, (cool
to have, but often loads of trouble) but I'll leave it to you to make the
decision. I guess in our heart we know what's right for us.


"Martin Ewing" wrote in message
m...

Hello,

I am doing market research for a new HF rig, and the Icom IC-746pro
would be a leading choice, but I'm worried about the "no transmit" and
other problems discussed at length on the web.

Of course, you take your chances whenever you get a new high-tech toy.
My question is how does the '746pro stack up against the competition in
terms of actual failure rate and reliability? This is something the
manufacturers are keenly aware of from their warranty data, but they
probably aren't going to share it with us. :-(

Most of us don't see enough different examples of enough types of rigs
to have first-hand data, and anecdotes on the net are hard to calibrate.
Given the bad press on the '746pro, I am pretty leery now, but if it's
really only a small percentage of units that are affected, I might
reconsider.

How would you decide?

73, Martin, AA6E




  #5   Report Post  
Old December 13th 03, 02:23 AM
PJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I too liked the looks of it. I joined the Yahoo group for the 746 PRO, and
I would advise you to do the same.

According to a late post on the site, serial numbers are being produced with
several modifications that should make it more reliable.

Myself, I am leaning toward a new TS 570, even though the features of the
746 are quite alluring.

I could draw parallels between this and beautiful women or fast cars, (cool
to have, but often loads of trouble) but I'll leave it to you to make the
decision. I guess in our heart we know what's right for us.


"Martin Ewing" wrote in message
m...

Hello,

I am doing market research for a new HF rig, and the Icom IC-746pro
would be a leading choice, but I'm worried about the "no transmit" and
other problems discussed at length on the web.

Of course, you take your chances whenever you get a new high-tech toy.
My question is how does the '746pro stack up against the competition in
terms of actual failure rate and reliability? This is something the
manufacturers are keenly aware of from their warranty data, but they
probably aren't going to share it with us. :-(

Most of us don't see enough different examples of enough types of rigs
to have first-hand data, and anecdotes on the net are hard to calibrate.
Given the bad press on the '746pro, I am pretty leery now, but if it's
really only a small percentage of units that are affected, I might
reconsider.

How would you decide?

73, Martin, AA6E






  #6   Report Post  
Old December 13th 03, 03:53 AM
Bob Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:26:33 GMT, Martin Ewing wrote:


Hello,

I am doing market research for a new HF rig, and the Icom IC-746pro
would be a leading choice, but I'm worried about the "no transmit" and
other problems discussed at length on the web.

Of course, you take your chances whenever you get a new high-tech toy.
My question is how does the '746pro stack up against the competition in
terms of actual failure rate and reliability? This is something the
manufacturers are keenly aware of from their warranty data, but they
probably aren't going to share it with us. :-(

Most of us don't see enough different examples of enough types of rigs
to have first-hand data, and anecdotes on the net are hard to calibrate.
Given the bad press on the '746pro, I am pretty leery now, but if it's
really only a small percentage of units that are affected, I might
reconsider.

How would you decide?

73, Martin, AA6E


The 746pro was introduced in Spring of 2002. (It was reviewed in May
2002 qst.) They oughtta have the bugs out by now.

Buying a new rig is a delicate balance between waiting awhile after
it's introduced, but not so long it's about to be discontinued :-)

Kinda like these damned computers...

Bob
k5qwg

  #7   Report Post  
Old December 13th 03, 03:53 AM
Bob Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:26:33 GMT, Martin Ewing wrote:


Hello,

I am doing market research for a new HF rig, and the Icom IC-746pro
would be a leading choice, but I'm worried about the "no transmit" and
other problems discussed at length on the web.

Of course, you take your chances whenever you get a new high-tech toy.
My question is how does the '746pro stack up against the competition in
terms of actual failure rate and reliability? This is something the
manufacturers are keenly aware of from their warranty data, but they
probably aren't going to share it with us. :-(

Most of us don't see enough different examples of enough types of rigs
to have first-hand data, and anecdotes on the net are hard to calibrate.
Given the bad press on the '746pro, I am pretty leery now, but if it's
really only a small percentage of units that are affected, I might
reconsider.

How would you decide?

73, Martin, AA6E


The 746pro was introduced in Spring of 2002. (It was reviewed in May
2002 qst.) They oughtta have the bugs out by now.

Buying a new rig is a delicate balance between waiting awhile after
it's introduced, but not so long it's about to be discontinued :-)

Kinda like these damned computers...

Bob
k5qwg

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Octavia QSL's Reliable Outfit? DOUGLAS SNOWDEN Dx 2 September 8th 04 10:49 AM
Octavia QSL's Reliable Outfit? DOUGLAS SNOWDEN Dx 0 September 8th 04 03:05 AM
TS57SG vs. IC746pro Fred McKenzie Equipment 17 July 27th 03 11:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017