Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/2/2013 12:01 AM, wrote: snip $100 Hong Kong is $12.89 US; I doubt you will find many VHF marine radios $12.89 US. There are amateur radios available for $500 HK. That is not out of the question. $500 is 5 times $100, which is the amount in question. And I don't know what other countries use the dollar, but I'm sure there are. I already told you what they are. snip Which does not mean short stations do not have to be licensed. They still do. Yes, but the original question was about monitoring, and no license is required for that. snip It is exactly the issue. You can't say whether a license is required or not until you know what country the OP is in. How much are you willing to bet he is in neither the USA or Canada, both of which have essentially the same rules. Also, he said he wanted to monitor on land. snip That does not mean the licensing requirements are the same. They are for the USA and Canada. snip I don't think reviews are illegal to operate in any country, though maybe North Korea... But you don't know. As I said before, in the U.S., marine stations still need to be licensed when on land (the same is true of aircraft radios, BTW). Which has nothing to do with what I said; read it again. -- Jim Pennino |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/2/2013 12:59 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 9/2/2013 12:01 AM, wrote: snip $100 Hong Kong is $12.89 US; I doubt you will find many VHF marine radios $12.89 US. There are amateur radios available for $500 HK. That is not out of the question. $500 is 5 times $100, which is the amount in question. Yup. Glad to see you can do multiplication. Shall we try division now? And I don't know what other countries use the dollar, but I'm sure there are. I already told you what they are. That's all of them? I know you didn't mention Hong Kong in your earlier post. snip Which does not mean short stations do not have to be licensed. They still do. Yes, but the original question was about monitoring, and no license is required for that. No, but then you don't need a transceiver on land, either. A simple scanner will suffice. However, he specifically is asking about installing a radio. To me this means he wants to monitor the *trip*, not the frequency - and to do so is interested in talking to those in the kayaks. Why else would he be asking about installing a radio, instead of just a receiver? snip It is exactly the issue. You can't say whether a license is required or not until you know what country the OP is in. How much are you willing to bet he is in neither the USA or Canada, both of which have essentially the same rules. I'm not willing to bet anything, because I don't make assumptions one way or the other. And I don't give advice based on facts I don't know. Also, he said he wanted to monitor on land. Again - he said he wanted to monitor the trip - not the frequency. And he specifically asked about installing a radio - instead of a handheld. To me this means he also wants to talk. snip That does not mean the licensing requirements are the same. They are for the USA and Canada. No where did he say where he was from. You are making an unwarranted assumption. snip I don't think reviews are illegal to operate in any country, though maybe North Korea... But you don't know. As I said before, in the U.S., marine stations still need to be licensed when on land (the same is true of aircraft radios, BTW). Which has nothing to do with what I said; read it again. No, it doesn't have anything to do with what YOU said. But it has EVERYTHING to do with what the OP said. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/2/2013 12:59 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 9/2/2013 12:01 AM, wrote: snip $100 Hong Kong is $12.89 US; I doubt you will find many VHF marine radios $12.89 US. There are amateur radios available for $500 HK. That is not out of the question. $500 is 5 times $100, which is the amount in question. Yup. Glad to see you can do multiplication. Shall we try division now? Shall we try to pay attention to what was written, i.e. radios for $100? And I don't know what other countries use the dollar, but I'm sure there are. I already told you what they are. That's all of them? I know you didn't mention Hong Kong in your earlier post. I didn't mention all of them because the exchange rate make a $100 radio a ludicrous idea. snip Which does not mean short stations do not have to be licensed. They still do. Yes, but the original question was about monitoring, and no license is required for that. No, but then you don't need a transceiver on land, either. A simple scanner will suffice. Likely, but he also specifically said he might want to use it on his boat. However, he specifically is asking about installing a radio. To me this means he wants to monitor the *trip*, not the frequency - and to do so is interested in talking to those in the kayaks. Why else would he be asking about installing a radio, instead of just a receiver? Because: 1. A scanner may have never occured to him. 2. He also might use it on his boat as he said. snip It is exactly the issue. You can't say whether a license is required or not until you know what country the OP is in. How much are you willing to bet he is in neither the USA or Canada, both of which have essentially the same rules. I'm not willing to bet anything, because I don't make assumptions one way or the other. And I don't give advice based on facts I don't know. Ever heard the saying "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck."? Everything he wrote points to being from the US with a slight chance of Canada. Also, your "advice" had nothing to do with the questions asked and instead immediately took the position of net cop to make *sure* everything he did was legal in your eyes. Also, he said he wanted to monitor on land. Again - he said he wanted to monitor the trip - not the frequency. And he specifically asked about installing a radio - instead of a handheld. To me this means he also wants to talk. He actually said he wanted to monitor several things. snip That does not mean the licensing requirements are the same. They are for the USA and Canada. No where did he say where he was from. You are making an unwarranted assumption. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Also where he is is irrelevant to the questions he actually asked. snip I don't think reviews are illegal to operate in any country, though maybe North Korea... But you don't know. As I said before, in the U.S., marine stations still need to be licensed when on land (the same is true of aircraft radios, BTW). Which has nothing to do with what I said; read it again. No, it doesn't have anything to do with what YOU said. But it has EVERYTHING to do with what the OP said. Nope, I said the Internet is full of *reviews*. You immediately went off on legalities. Two differnent subjects. -- Jim Pennino |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/2/2013 3:55 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 9/2/2013 12:59 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 9/2/2013 12:01 AM, wrote: snip $100 Hong Kong is $12.89 US; I doubt you will find many VHF marine radios $12.89 US. There are amateur radios available for $500 HK. That is not out of the question. $500 is 5 times $100, which is the amount in question. Yup. Glad to see you can do multiplication. Shall we try division now? Shall we try to pay attention to what was written, i.e. radios for $100? Exactly. And there are some awfully cheap radios coming from China nowadays. Like this one: http://www.radioddity.com/us/baofeng...ham-radio.html Easily within the $100-500 HK. And I don't know what other countries use the dollar, but I'm sure there are. I already told you what they are. That's all of them? I know you didn't mention Hong Kong in your earlier post. I didn't mention all of them because the exchange rate make a $100 radio a ludicrous idea. Like the one I mentioned above? And are ALL Asian exchange rates the same? I don't think so. snip Which does not mean short stations do not have to be licensed. They still do. Yes, but the original question was about monitoring, and no license is required for that. No, but then you don't need a transceiver on land, either. A simple scanner will suffice. Likely, but he also specifically said he might want to use it on his boat. Which would indicate a transceiver. However, he specifically is asking about installing a radio. To me this means he wants to monitor the *trip*, not the frequency - and to do so is interested in talking to those in the kayaks. Why else would he be asking about installing a radio, instead of just a receiver? Because: 1. A scanner may have never occured to him. 2. He also might use it on his boat as he said. In which case he would need a license to use it in his truck in many (most?) countries. snip It is exactly the issue. You can't say whether a license is required or not until you know what country the OP is in. How much are you willing to bet he is in neither the USA or Canada, both of which have essentially the same rules. I'm not willing to bet anything, because I don't make assumptions one way or the other. And I don't give advice based on facts I don't know. Ever heard the saying "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck."? Everything he wrote points to being from the US with a slight chance of Canada. To use your language: Quack, Quack. Nothing he wrote pointed to any country. Also, your "advice" had nothing to do with the questions asked and instead immediately took the position of net cop to make *sure* everything he did was legal in your eyes. No, I am making sure the advice I give is legal in HIS jurisdiction. Obviously you don't care - you are more interested in arguing. Also, he said he wanted to monitor on land. Again - he said he wanted to monitor the trip - not the frequency. And he specifically asked about installing a radio - instead of a handheld. To me this means he also wants to talk. He actually said he wanted to monitor several things. Sure. And he specifically mentioned he wanted a radio instead of a handheld, and wanted to use it in his boat as well as his truck. Everything points to him asking for a transceiver. snip That does not mean the licensing requirements are the same. They are for the USA and Canada. No where did he say where he was from. You are making an unwarranted assumption. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Quack, quack. Also where he is is irrelevant to the questions he actually asked. Where he is is COMPLETELY relevant to the question he asked. But you are more interested in proving your point than giving him correct answers. snip I don't think reviews are illegal to operate in any country, though maybe North Korea... But you don't know. As I said before, in the U.S., marine stations still need to be licensed when on land (the same is true of aircraft radios, BTW). Which has nothing to do with what I said; read it again. No, it doesn't have anything to do with what YOU said. But it has EVERYTHING to do with what the OP said. Nope, I said the Internet is full of *reviews*. You immediately went off on legalities. Two differnent subjects. Obviously you can't read what I said. Once again - I wasn't talking about what YOU said (I really couldn't care less). I was replying to what the OP said. But you are really hooked on you being right, aren't you? Me, I'd rather give the OP answers which are legal where HE is. Which once again, we don't know because he hasn't said. Just because YOU are in the United States (or Canada) does NOT mean the rest of the world is. This is a typical US-centric attitude I have seen over and over again. There are other countries, you know. And some of them even use radios. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle, AI0K ================== |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
snip Obviously you can't read what I said. Once again - I wasn't talking about what YOU said (I really couldn't care less). I was replying to what the OP said. But you are really hooked on you being right, aren't you? Me, I'd rather give the OP answers which are legal where HE is. Which once again, we don't know because he hasn't said. Just because YOU are in the United States (or Canada) does NOT mean the rest of the world is. This is a typical US-centric attitude I have seen over and over again. There are other countries, you know. And some of them even use radios. Here is the orginal question: "Other than the obvious features like the remote mic unit, what should I look for in getting a quality unit that will work the best without breaking the bank." FYI a feature is something like how many memories, are the backlights dimmable, or does it have a built in AC power supply. Nothing in that question has any relevance to what country the asker is in. You ignored the only question he had and went off on a net cop tangent about legalities and needing to know what country he is in. To be complete in that line of thinking you also need to know of which country he is a citizen as any good net cop should know most countries do not issue radio licenses to foreigner. As for me, I just like having fun poking at net cops that get their panties in a wad and go of on irrelevant tangets when someone asks a rather simple question. -- Jim Pennino |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/2/2013 6:47 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: snip Obviously you can't read what I said. Once again - I wasn't talking about what YOU said (I really couldn't care less). I was replying to what the OP said. But you are really hooked on you being right, aren't you? Me, I'd rather give the OP answers which are legal where HE is. Which once again, we don't know because he hasn't said. Just because YOU are in the United States (or Canada) does NOT mean the rest of the world is. This is a typical US-centric attitude I have seen over and over again. There are other countries, you know. And some of them even use radios. Here is the orginal question: "Other than the obvious features like the remote mic unit, what should I look for in getting a quality unit that will work the best without breaking the bank." FYI a feature is something like how many memories, are the backlights dimmable, or does it have a built in AC power supply. Nothing in that question has any relevance to what country the asker is in. You ignored the only question he had and went off on a net cop tangent about legalities and needing to know what country he is in. To be complete in that line of thinking you also need to know of which country he is a citizen as any good net cop should know most countries do not issue radio licenses to foreigner. You obviously don't understand what the term "net cop" means. Or you wouldn't be one. As for me, I just like having fun poking at net cops that get their panties in a wad and go of on irrelevant tangets when someone asks a rather simple question. So you admit you're a troll as well as a net cop? It figures. plonk -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. ================== |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM-FM broadcast radio/antenna in truck? | Antenna | |||
Got that Car/Truck AM/FM Radio in the Home : Now You Need an AM/MW Antenna or Two ! | Shortwave | |||
96 chevy truck radio location | Homebrew | |||
96 chevy truck radio location help | General | |||
96 chevy truck radio location help | Scanner |