Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord
that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it? HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that NTSC does now...everything. And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it replaces. NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit. TMT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message oups.com... I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it? HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that NTSC does now...everything. And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it replaces. NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit. I'd like to believe that, but I'm afraid that the FCC has other ideas. I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of scratch to WATCH on them. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:44:57 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of scratch to WATCH on them. HDTVs are actually a LOT cheaper than that now. You can get a 27ish Sanyo set with a built in ATSC tuner for about $450 now. Not top quality, but unless Sanyo is farming out manufacturing to Durabrand it should be decent. Andy Cuffe -- Use this address until 12/31/2005 -- Use this address after 12/31/2005 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Cuffe" wrote in message ... On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:44:57 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of scratch to WATCH on them. HDTVs are actually a LOT cheaper than that now. You can get a 27ish Sanyo set with a built in ATSC tuner for about $450 now. Not top quality, but unless Sanyo is farming out manufacturing to Durabrand it should be decent. Sure don't have anything like that available at our PX or through AAFES Online. Cheapest digital ready TV we have access to is $1000, 24" screen, and has no digital tuner even available for it yet. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brenda Ann" wrote:
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message oups.com... I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it? HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that NTSC does now...everything. And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it replaces. NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit. I'd like to believe that, but I'm afraid that the FCC has other ideas. I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of scratch to WATCH on them. Not a widescreen, but not a bad deal for an entry level set. No where near $1750-2100 either! Check your facts first. http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=2601424 Chip -- -------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ -------------------- Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote:
wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message groups.com... I would agree....would you want your cell phone to come with a cord that you had to plug into a stationary socket before using it? HDTV will not be a replacement for NTSC until it does everything that NTSC does now...everything. And the public will not accept it until it does everything that it replaces. NTSC will be with us longer than anyone wants to admit. I'd like to believe that, but I'm afraid that the FCC has other ideas. I know I won't be buying an HDTV receiver any time soon, they're still WAY out of my budget. I can buy a 27" NTSC set that looks just fine for what's being broadcast for $175, it's 10x to 12x that for the cheapest HDTV ready (without the HDTV tuner) set. Damn if I'll pay more than a week's wages for a TV set, there's just nothing worth that kind of scratch to WATCH on them. Not a widescreen, but not a bad deal for an entry level set. No where near $1750-2100 either! Check your facts first. http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=2601424 Chip If it's not widescreen, it's not HDTV. Yes, it is HD. If you are watching an HD broadcast, there will be bars on the top and bottom. It cuts down the size of the viewable screen, but it is HD. The effective screen size would be 29.4" instead of the actual size of 32". Chip -- -------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ -------------------- Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The screen aspect ratio has nothing to do with whether a tv is HDTV or
not. If the tv can display the lines of resolution at the appropriate scan rate for HDTV, then it is high definition. Just because it may have bars on the top and bottom, or on the side when displaying a different aspect ratio has nothing to do with HDTV or not. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote:
wrote: The screen aspect ratio has nothing to do with whether a tv is HDTV or not. If the tv can display the lines of resolution at the appropriate scan rate for HDTV, then it is high definition. Just because it may have bars on the top and bottom, or on the side when displaying a different aspect ratio has nothing to do with HDTV or not. I guess if it shows the correct resolution but why anyone would want to buy something that bass-ackward, I don't know. May as well just buy a smaller TV with the correct aspect ratio. True, and this is likely a piece of junk tv, but the poster I was responding to said that you couldn't get even an HD monitor for less than $1750. Chip -- -------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ -------------------- Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Newbie: Is this a good deal? | Shortwave | |||
POLL: ICF-2010 or ICF-7600GR | Shortwave | |||
Portable QRP project for blind ham living in apartment. | Antenna | |||
Portable QRP project for blind ham living in apartment. | Equipment | |||
Portable QRP project for blind ham living in apartment. | Equipment |