Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Best ARRL Hankbook issue
I still have my 64 edition.
"Argusy" wrote in message ... J-McC wrote: I used to really enjoy the ARRL handbook. I used to purchase a new one every so often here in Australia. I think the best valve ones were in the late 80's and then naturally it slowly evolved to semiconductors, integrated circuits and printed circuit boards and more sophistacted circuits etc. Just took a look - I've still got a 1977 issue. Threw out the earlier ones when I moved around the countryside (RAAF Bases Amberley, Edinburgh, Garbutt, Laverton (now some other name), not in any particular order) I think the old days of truly making your own receiver and or transmitter are allmost gone. I agree I have become old any eyesight is now growing dim! snip Well, eyesight's not dim, but I can't read without specs anymore When I look at some of the modern Ham gear I am amazed at how complex and tiny they have become. I supposed all we really have left now is making aerials and dxing. Yeah... Next time I am in the city I must checkout the latest ARRL Handbook as I still enjoying reading them in bed. I can't do that anymore - book's too heavy, and my eyes get bloodshot. BTW, I still have William Orr's 1978 'Radio Handbook' as well. That's also good for a read occasionally, as well Jim McCardle ex VK3ZOE in Australia. snip Argusy AKA Graham (VK5CRC but "deaf" for 20 years) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Best ARRL Hankbook issue
That's the first one I ever bought (graduated that year, that's how I
know) but sadly, now gone. Graham AKA VK5CRC Juan M. wrote: I still have my 64 edition. "Argusy" wrote in message ... J-McC wrote: I used to really enjoy the ARRL handbook. I used to purchase a new one every so often here in Australia. I think the best valve ones were in the late 80's and then naturally it slowly evolved to semiconductors, integrated circuits and printed circuit boards and more sophistacted circuits etc. Just took a look - I've still got a 1977 issue. Threw out the earlier ones when I moved around the countryside (RAAF Bases Amberley, Edinburgh, Garbutt, Laverton (now some other name), not in any particular order) I think the old days of truly making your own receiver and or transmitter are allmost gone. I agree I have become old any eyesight is now growing dim! snip Well, eyesight's not dim, but I can't read without specs anymore When I look at some of the modern Ham gear I am amazed at how complex and tiny they have become. I supposed all we really have left now is making aerials and dxing. Yeah... Next time I am in the city I must checkout the latest ARRL Handbook as I still enjoying reading them in bed. I can't do that anymore - book's too heavy, and my eyes get bloodshot. BTW, I still have William Orr's 1978 'Radio Handbook' as well. That's also good for a read occasionally, as well Jim McCardle ex VK3ZOE in Australia. snip Argusy AKA Graham (VK5CRC but "deaf" for 20 years) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Best ARRL Hankbook issue
Argusy wrote: That's the first one I ever bought (graduated that year, that's how I know) but sadly, now gone. Graham AKA VK5CRC Juan M. wrote: I still have my 64 edition. "Argusy" wrote in message ... J-McC wrote: I used to really enjoy the ARRL handbook. I used to purchase a new one every so often here in Australia. I think the best valve ones were in the late 80's and then naturally it slowly evolved to semiconductors, integrated circuits and printed circuit boards and more sophistacted circuits etc. Just took a look - I've still got a 1977 issue. Threw out the earlier ones when I moved around the countryside (RAAF Bases Amberley, Edinburgh, Garbutt, Laverton (now some other name), not in any particular order) I think the old days of truly making your own receiver and or transmitter are allmost gone. It's not a question of can't. It's a question of don't want to. Look at a Mini-Circuits catalog sometime. What people would have given for those parts in 1940...0r 1960? http://www.minicircuits.com/ My biggest beef with ARRL handbooks were they were too specific to Amateur radio. If you knew RF theory and good design practice you could build anything you wanted. They used to publish all these homebrew receivers that were actually poor designs because they assumed the amateur wanted a ham-band-only receiver and nothing else, and also did not have a generator to align them with. They were also very trendy in that when the new came in they promoted it to the exclusion of all else. For example, they went over 100% to solid state on PCBs in the early 70s, despite the fact a lot of hams never liked making PC boards and quit building when they were convinced the tube equipment was no good. They did not promote the idea that you needed good test equipment and encouraged the use of half-assed methods and procedures. When they did publish test equipment projects it was for the stuff you could buy cheaply, not for what you really needed that was expensive. They never published a frequency counter that was any good even though counters were high dollar relative to build cost until the 1990s. Still, there's a lot of good data there. My favorite ARRL books are 1955, 1962, 1965 and 1976. The RSGB books from that timeframe are also excellent and the W6SAI book can be as well, but he was a poor editor. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Best ARRL Hankbook issue
That was a very informative reply regarding the whole homebrew thing. Where CAN you find good circuits to build, by the way? I saw a cool schematic for an all-tube general coverage reciver, but on the same site was a harmonic-ridden two tube transmitter schematic. One band, no less. I'm trying cook up an interesting homebrew project. Any ideas? "Bret Ludwig" wrote in message ups.com... Argusy wrote: That's the first one I ever bought (graduated that year, that's how I know) but sadly, now gone. Graham AKA VK5CRC Juan M. wrote: I still have my 64 edition. "Argusy" wrote in message ... J-McC wrote: I used to really enjoy the ARRL handbook. I used to purchase a new one every so often here in Australia. I think the best valve ones were in the late 80's and then naturally it slowly evolved to semiconductors, integrated circuits and printed circuit boards and more sophistacted circuits etc. Just took a look - I've still got a 1977 issue. Threw out the earlier ones when I moved around the countryside (RAAF Bases Amberley, Edinburgh, Garbutt, Laverton (now some other name), not in any particular order) I think the old days of truly making your own receiver and or transmitter are allmost gone. It's not a question of can't. It's a question of don't want to. Look at a Mini-Circuits catalog sometime. What people would have given for those parts in 1940...0r 1960? http://www.minicircuits.com/ My biggest beef with ARRL handbooks were they were too specific to Amateur radio. If you knew RF theory and good design practice you could build anything you wanted. They used to publish all these homebrew receivers that were actually poor designs because they assumed the amateur wanted a ham-band-only receiver and nothing else, and also did not have a generator to align them with. They were also very trendy in that when the new came in they promoted it to the exclusion of all else. For example, they went over 100% to solid state on PCBs in the early 70s, despite the fact a lot of hams never liked making PC boards and quit building when they were convinced the tube equipment was no good. They did not promote the idea that you needed good test equipment and encouraged the use of half-assed methods and procedures. When they did publish test equipment projects it was for the stuff you could buy cheaply, not for what you really needed that was expensive. They never published a frequency counter that was any good even though counters were high dollar relative to build cost until the 1990s. Still, there's a lot of good data there. My favorite ARRL books are 1955, 1962, 1965 and 1976. The RSGB books from that timeframe are also excellent and the W6SAI book can be as well, but he was a poor editor. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Admits Mistakes in Regulation By Bandwidth Proposal | Policy | |||
Putting ARRL back "mainstream" with hometown hams | Policy | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||
The Amateur Code | Policy |