Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old May 16th 06, 01:36 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL members, I need your help.


N9OGL wrote:
Why??? Morse Code does not make you a better radio operator, On air
experiance does. This idea that morse code makes you a better operatror
is nothing more then a myth.

Todd N9OGL
General Class Operator


You only say that because you had to struggle to get the 5 wpm code
required now, Toad.

  #12   Report Post  
Old May 16th 06, 02:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment
Win
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL members, I need your help.

On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:35:36 -0400, wrote:

"This is a perfect example of viewing the future through your
rear-view mirror."

I view many things through my rear-view mirror these days. It's a
better view, for the most part. Perhaps amateur radio would be better
off dying a slow death, rather than becoming completely *******ized.

I am not sure it would be fun to take all the elements from back in
the the 60s, every four years, though.

No, I am no longer an ARRL member....

Win, w0lz

  #15   Report Post  
Old May 16th 06, 07:26 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
The Wasp
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL members, I need your help.

In article t,
Slow Code wrote:

Please email mail this to your Division Directors and Section managers.
With a loud voice, maybe we can get the ARRL to work for us instead of
against us:


No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all elements
required for their license class.


The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%.


Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra.


Make the no-code Tech license one year non-renewable.


sc


The real demise of ham radio is not from dropping the code, but from
making it such a elitist group that nobody wants to join. There is
safety in numbers. We need to make the numbers bigger not smaller.


  #17   Report Post  
Old May 16th 06, 09:07 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
an old freind
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL members, I need your help.


The Wasp wrote:
In article t,
Slow Code wrote:


Make the no-code Tech license one year non-renewable.


sc


The real demise of ham radio is not from dropping the code, but from
making it such a elitist group that nobody wants to join. There is
safety in numbers. We need to make the numbers bigger not smaller.


well said

  #18   Report Post  
Old May 16th 06, 09:52 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL members, I need your help.

umm, moron I took my 5 WPM back in 1991 and my 13 WPM in 1993...you
don't what the **** your talking about

Todd N9OGL

  #19   Report Post  
Old May 16th 06, 09:52 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL members, I need your help.

umm, moron I took my 5 WPM back in 1991 and my 13 WPM in 1993...you
don't what the **** your talking about

Todd N9OGL

  #20   Report Post  
Old May 16th 06, 11:47 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Radio Buff
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL members, I need your help.

The Wasp wrote in
:

In article t,
Slow Code wrote:

Please email mail this to your Division Directors and Section managers.
With a loud voice, maybe we can get the ARRL to work for us instead of
against us:


No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all
elements required for their license class.


The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%.


Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra.


Make the no-code Tech license one year non-renewable.


sc


The real demise of ham radio is not from dropping the code, but from
making it such a elitist group that nobody wants to join. There is
safety in numbers. We need to make the numbers bigger not smaller.




Yes. One big happy CB like family with a few Homo's thrown in to make it
more perverted.

sc
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMATEUR RADIO VOLUNTEERS FILLING COMMUNICATION GAPS IN GULF REGIONfrom today's ARRL Letter Dave Heil Policy 0 September 10th 05 03:57 AM
List of Scanner Groups zerg90 Scanner 0 July 22nd 05 09:31 PM
Open Letter to K1MAN [email protected] Policy 13 April 15th 05 07:43 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 February 13th 05 07:34 PM
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! NIW Policy 0 March 23rd 04 10:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017