Lloyd Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:46:41 GMT, U-Know-Who wrote:

Good deal. Go discuss your prostrate and hemorrhoids via CW.

It is spelled "prostate," but you did get "hemorrhoids" right. If you
had to spell things via CW, you wouldn't have spelled only 50% of the
big words right. I admit that you could use the Q signal for "How is
your prostate?" (QYP?), but most good ops spell things out instead.

QYH?

--.- ..- -.-. -.- --- --.- .-.-.-

On 3 Oct 2006 04:10:04 -0700, Secwet Woger, CW Man, wrote:

Lloyd Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:46:41 GMT, U-Know-Who wrote:

Good deal. Go discuss your prostrate and hemorrhoids via CW.

It is spelled "prostate," but you did get "hemorrhoids" right. If you
had to spell things via CW, you wouldn't have spelled only 50% of the
big words right. I admit that you could use the Q signal for "How is
your prostate?" (QYP?), but most good ops spell things out instead.

QYH?

--.- ..- -.-. -.- --- --.- .-.-.-

Uh, Woger, "Q U C K O Q ." makes no sense at all.

But then you seldom do. QYH?


----
"Just because YOU don't know how anonymous remailers work, doesn't
mean everybody else does, imbecile." -- Secwet Woger in message-id
s.it

Davey Heil K8MN, pretending to be Lloyd Morgan wrote:
On 3 Oct 2006 04:10:04 -0700, Secwet Woger, CW Man, wrote:

Lloyd Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:46:41 GMT, U-Know-Who wrote:

Good deal. Go discuss your prostrate and hemorrhoids via CW.

It is spelled "prostate," but you did get "hemorrhoids" right. If you
had to spell things via CW, you wouldn't have spelled only 50% of the
big words right. I admit that you could use the Q signal for "How is
your prostate?" (QYP?), but most good ops spell things out instead.

QYH?

..-. ..- -.-. -.- -.-- --- ..- .-.-.-

Uh, Woger, "Q U C K O Q ." makes no sense at all.

Uh, Fatass, get your glasses prescription changed.

On 3 Oct 2006 05:25:50 -0700, Secwet Woger, CW Man, wrote:

Davey Heil K8MN, pretending to be Lloyd Morgan wrote:
On 3 Oct 2006 04:10:04 -0700, Secwet Woger, CW Man, wrote:

Lloyd Morgan wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:46:41 GMT, U-Know-Who wrote:

Good deal. Go discuss your prostrate and hemorrhoids via CW.

It is spelled "prostate," but you did get "hemorrhoids" right. If you
had to spell things via CW, you wouldn't have spelled only 50% of the
big words right. I admit that you could use the Q signal for "How is
your prostate?" (QYP?), but most good ops spell things out instead.

QYH?

..-. ..- -.-. -.- -.-- --- ..- .-.-.-

Uh, Woger, "Q U C K O Q ." makes no sense at all.

Uh, Fatass, get your glasses prescription changed.

In your demented mind, post editing your original "CW" just changed
the truth of the matter, didn't it?

The truth is, you couldn't even cuss in Morse code on your first
attempt. In your case, that has rendered you speechless on CW.

QYH?


----
"If a man have long hair it is a shame unto him." -- Paul, I Cor. 11:14

Davey Heil K8MN, posting as Lloyd Morgan wrote:
crap

Pious Davey Heil, K8MN blatantly lies even when a call to (304)
845-5511 can verify Glen Dale has no jail facility in
. net:
"Why were you in the lockup in Glen Dale?"