| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... [snip] The late Dick Carrol/W0EX prided himself on being able to send code so poorly that even a computer code reader couldn't copy him. This was in order to prevent unworthy No-Code Technicians from eavesdropping on him. That was plain stupid. There's no need to try to send deliberately bad code. Only the finest operators can send code well enough with a hand key that a computer can copy it anyway. Only exceptionally good operators can send well enough with a bug that a computer can copy it. Only very good operators can send well enough with paddles that computers can copy it. Basically a computer is good at copying computer generated code. BTW, all the other Pro-Code Extras were good with it, coming up with cool, old-timey sounding excuses for such bad behavoir. "Banana Boat Swing" and "unique fist" were heard. A ham needn't try to produce CW that meets the Morse Code specification for dots, dashes, inter-dot/dash spacing, inter-character spacing, and inter-word spacing. The "Banana Boat Swing" and "unique fist" existed long, long before computers came along. These were simply operators with poor sending skills. And they are a pain in the ear and brain to copy. I usually move on rather than respond to them. Dee, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| hey BB did steve do somethign specail toy uo laely? | Policy | |||
| The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
| More News of Radio Amateurs' Work in the Andamans | Shortwave | |||
| Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||