-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In (Jeffrey Herman) writes:

John Smith I wrote:
Now that just speaks volumes about this man, his caliber, his "ethical
standards", etc. Now, doesn't it?

Your impression of Paul is completely wrong. He is singlehandedly
responsible for the creation of the entire rec.radio hierarchy. He
wrote the charters, solicited the calls for discussions and calls
for votes for each and every rr ng.

Oh, let's not forget Brian Kantor WB6CYT (Info-Hams administrator), Jay
Maynard K5ZC (1991 rec.radio.amateur.* reorg proponent), Ian Kluft KO6YQ
(1993 rec.radio.amateur.* reorg proponent), Mark Salyzyn AG4YD/ex-VE3MGS
(rec.radio.info proponent and moderator), Ralph Brandi
(rec.radio.shortwave proponent/FAQ maintainer and originator of the
rec.radio.* hierarchy), Rick Stealey K2XT (rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
proponent), Richard Eckman KO4MR (rec.radio.amateur.dx proponent) and
many others, I'm sure. I've mostly felt like I've just come along for
the ride, or at best, "stood on the shoulders of giants" like Jonathan
Kamens, Tim Skirvin, Ron Dippold, et al.

It was either Paul or Brian who wrote the Usenet software that's
universally used to carry the newsgroups. (Paul, help me out
here; that seems like a century ago...)

Alas, the only software that's used regularly on Usenet that I had a
hand in was auto-faq:

http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/auto-faq/

Though Brian did have a big hand in the early history of the Info-Hams
mailing list, from which the amateur radio newsgroups owe their origin
via a gateway.

- --
73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU

http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/
Finger for PGP Public Key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS)

iD8DBQFFvYRE6Pj0az779o4RAhotAJ9LFVWMBeisgUqVMh7iS0 rn82y9GACgmMrZ
quwL+mmuM5FAOXKLv5Oc/vE=
=Jc5q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

KC4UAI wrote:

...

KC4UAI:

If you don't take the first post in this thread as "proof", then there
will never be proof for you.

The man stacked the deck with himself and his henchmen, then he
proceeded to lie to the committee. Not only is that proof, it is a
disgrace!

JS

KC4UAI wrote:

...

KC4UAI:

However, if they are just patient, rethink their proposal, write it up
differently and lose all the "control freak" text, guess what? That
charter for the moderated group will float! It would be granted!

Don't you think they are smart enough to figure that out? Don't you
think Paul is enough of a politician to realize that? I think so!

That newsgroup will come into being, if only they get their chit
together and "fly right."

Then, guess what, we will see what type of people we deal with. Guess
what? I am betting exactly what has been stated here will happen.

Be patient man, the universe unfolds to you in its' own time ...

Regards,
JS