Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Agent Smith" wrote in message news:3ff6666b.4278809718@feadnread... On 19 Aug 2003 19:55:22 -0700, Brian Kelly wrote: I'm familiar with Emmaus and drove around the borough today looking for the stuff with my TS-50 but struck out. Kindly cite an intersection where the stuff is in use, I'll try again. Also characterize the signal if you can/will. Such 'powerful' interference that even someone who knows where it is supposed to be can't find it? g I had NO problem finding it, but I had the advantage that Ed Hare had told me where to look, knowing that I live not far away. The fact that the deployment is limited makes it hard(er) to find if you don't know where to look ... and lots of the wiring in that area is underground, which makes it sort of a "best case scenario" ... with more overhead wiring, it would be a lot worse (though it's awful in the deployment area as it is ...) Listen to Ed Hare's video on the ARRL website ... I can assure you that Ed wouldn't "doctor" things even if the ARRL tried to tell him to do so (not that I believe or am insinuating that they would). If the trash you hear on the video for Test Area #3 (Emmaus) doesn't bother you - especially considering it's a "best case" sort of situation with a limited deployment - then you obviously don't give a damn about amateur radio. Carl - wk3c |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew |