"Roger Gt" wrote:

(snip) You are not quoting me, and clearly
did not read nor understand what I said.
I said only one (Jackass) jumped the marine.
There were fifty demonstrators present,
most ran when the violence erupted. Many
(8) jumped in to help, including myself.
fifteen were looked at for medical reasons,
but they were only three broken bones,
which I stated clearly! (snip)
Where do you get off mis-quoting in order
to try to cast doubt upon someone else?
Is it poor form, dishonest and makes you
look foolish!


Lets see who is really being dishonest here. Your exact words were...

"The worst one was when a gang
of about fifty demonstrators tried
to prevent an ex Marine from going
to class because the demonstration
was "shutting down" the school.. It
was only heated discussion, until
some jackass decided that since the
Jar-Head wouldn't do what they
told him they would restrain him. He
was gentle, no fatalities, fifteen taken
for medical attention. NEVER JUMP
a mud Marine! The crowd scattered
when he started breaking bones."

You clearly said "they," not one, tried to restrain the marine ("they
would restrain him"). You said nothing about most demonstrators running when
the violence erupted. Instead, you said the "crowd scattered when he started
breaking bones." You said nothing about the number of broken bones. And,
finally, you said fifteen demonstrators needed medical attention ("He was
gentle, no fatalities, fifteen taken for medical attention"). The story
you're telling now is a lot different from the story you told before.


Snipping out partial quotes, and modifying
them to allow you more to comment on is
not questionable it is dishonest!


I have not modified a single one of the quotes of what you've said. Your
messages, and my quotes from those messages, are there for all to see.


(snip) You would be a poor juror! The court
is clear, testimony and physical evidence are
the only material you may base a finding upon.


Of course, this is a public forum, not a courtroom, Roger. However, lets
look at this from that perspective for a moment. The strongest testimony is
that backed up by physical evidence. You've offered no physical evidence.
Regardless, since you've now changed your story under cross examination,
nothing you've said would hold up even in a courtroom.


(snip) After a visit to your poorly written web
site, I see your travels possibly corrupted your
perspective and you have a twisted view of
reality!


Those travels were arranged, and paid for, by the Department of Defense.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/