In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:20:56 +1100, "Martin, VK2UMJ"
wrote:

Temper ... temper ....
:-)))

73 de G3NYY


*****************************TROLL**************** **********

In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:07:55 GMT, Concerned Amateur
wrote:

nonsence.

pompus

It's a well-known characteristic of CBers that they are all
illiterate. Your latest posting proves the point.

73 de G3NYY

*****************************TROLL**************** *********

"Walter Raleigh" wrote:

:
: "ZZZPK " .es.it.net wrote
: in message ...
:
: "shoutred"
:
: "rwad"
:
: "yeh"
:
: "witht"
:
: "COMPULSRY"
:
: Glass houses and stones come to mind. When preaching to Brian about his
: actions and beliefs, an attempt to respond in the same language would be
: nice.


DEOTH


now... what were yousaying about GLASSHOUSES ????????????????????

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote:

: 73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
: http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
: VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/
:
: You STILL don't get it do you? Try addressing what I am complaining about.
: Or can't you do so without spinning things way out of wack? ONE MORE
: TIME;;;;;;IT IS NOT HAM RADIO. IT IS INTERNET CONNECTED TO RADIO. DON'T
: CALL IT HAM RADIO.
:
: Dan/W4NTI
:
:

Dan

youre wasting your time.

some of the people on this newsgroup think they have an ADVANCED B-licence
because they sat a morse assessment that 11year old kids can pass after
one hour practice in a radio club the night before.


others think that plugging a radio into a telephone socket is pushing the
technolgoy to its limits!

"ZZZPK " .es.it.net wrote
in message ...
DEOTH

Ah yes, one typo, on an unfamiliar lap-top keyboard, quickly corrected in a
follow up post, as opposed to a decade of pseudo-dyslexic repetitive
drivel. I think you've beaten me there....sigh!. Incidentally, I don't use
a spell-checker, perhaps you need to try it.

--
73s de Walter R.

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...

Well, it's a Bank Holiday ... and "idle hands will mischief make"!
;-)

Indeed! Have a good one

--
73s de Walter R.

Walt Davidson wrote:

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:06:16 +1100, G-S wrote:

And what makes you think I lack sufficient technical expertise to operate
a
radio or build a radio or accessories? I have done all those in the past.
I have demonstrated those skills... I choose to use a more modern method
because it is simply better and more efficient!

A better and more efficient method would be to use a cellphone or even
an ordinary telephone. Amateur radio is not necessarily about being
"better and more efficient". If you think it is, you've missed the
point.

If you think it isn't then _you_ have missed the point. Amateur radio has
been instrumental in the introduction of many new radio technologies over
the last 100 odd years.

As for not using repeaters do not forget you live on a green postage stamp
sized country where simplex VHF is likely to cover a significant proportion
of your country.

I have an easy simplex 2m range FM range of about 100km to the north and
West and about 50 km to the south and east. That covers an amateur
population of about 200. Anecdotely about 50% are active sometimes and
about 25% use VHF sometimes. That leaves about 50 amateurs most of whom are
not very active.

Repeaters provide a means of increasing the available amateurs for such
activites as the local on repeater technical discussion night, organising
the local swap meet and many other useful amateur radio related functions.


G-S VK3DMN

Walt Davidson wrote:

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:07:51 +1100, G-S wrote:

You really have a bee in your bonet about CBers don't you!

They are simply not relevant to amateur radio ...

I wholeheartedly agree. Let's keep them out of amateur radio!

Until of course they pass the amateur radio license test, then lets welcome
them with open arms to increase our numbers and broaden our appeal :-) [1]


G-S VK3DMN

[1] before they pass they are welcome to be SWL's!

Walt Davidson wrote:

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:11:18 +1100, G-S wrote:

and basic genetic knowledge shows that crossbreeding generally
strengthens the breed...

It probably does ... for those who start off at rock-bottom in the
gene pool, any such crossbreeding opportunity would be seen as a
chance to better themselves.


As against those inbred until the last trace of viability is gone :-)


G-S VK3DMN

ZZZPK wrote:

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote:

: 73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
:
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
: VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/
:
: You STILL don't get it do you? Try addressing what I am complaining
: about.
: Or can't you do so without spinning things way out of wack? ONE MORE
: TIME;;;;;;IT IS NOT HAM RADIO. IT IS INTERNET CONNECTED TO RADIO.
: DON'T CALL IT HAM RADIO.
:
: Dan/W4NTI
:
:

Dan

youre wasting your time.

some of the people on this newsgroup think they have an ADVANCED B-licence
because they sat a morse assessment that 11year old kids can pass after
one hour practice in a radio club the night before.


No, I sat the old fast morse test... thanks for playing... do come again :-)


G-S VK3DMN