Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin, VK2UMJ wrote:
Until the IRLP 'contest' started and then you'd all be sitting there in your rocking chairs, wondering what the hell was happening and then whinging that nobody had even bothered to tell you that it was on! Well, thats probably true! And it is also probably true to say that there has been several times the amount of activity on this newsgroup than on the said "contest". -- Chris |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Kirby" wrote in message ... nana wrote: Certainly, the Echolink system has it's weeknesses, but it isn't under discussion here, IRLP is. And that's part of the issue, the confusion, or lack of understanding of the vital security differences between the two systems. What's "vital" about security? Is someone going to get hurt? As has been said many times before, anyone with or without a licence can invent a callsign and go "on-air". Once they done that, the IRLP network is just as easy to access as any other frequency. All this PGP authentication between nodes is just a spin-off from the fact that Dave Cameron invented the system primarily as a VOIP system to replace land-lines for commercial applications. It is quite unnecessary on the ham bands. -- Chris Yes, and the security was designed in so that services like the RCMP could use it without fear of internet hackers entering the linked system. Since Dan kept raising the issue of WWW users appearing on air, then it is pertinent that he should understand his error. Brad. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Chris Kirby wrote:
nana wrote: Certainly, the Echolink system has it's weeknesses, but it isn't under discussion here, IRLP is. And that's part of the issue, the confusion, or lack of understanding of the vital security differences between the two systems. What's "vital" about security? Is someone going to get hurt? As has been said many times before, anyone with or without a licence can invent a callsign and go "on-air". Once they done that, the IRLP network is just as easy to access as any other frequency. All this PGP authentication between nodes is just a spin-off from the fact that Dave Cameron invented the system primarily as a VOIP system to replace land-lines for commercial applications. It is quite unnecessary on the ham bands. The entry level to pirate on an IRLP node requires a radio. PGP is equally used in the Commercial IRLP systems as on Amateur Radio. Unnecessary, thats one point of view. The other is, another good demonstration of how PGP can be used to authenticate computers on the internet. IRLP uses bi-directional authentication with PGP...so your not going to masquerade... Would you prefer PGP authentication or a QRZ database lookup ? You decide............. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:40:22 +1100, "Martin, VK2UMJ" wrote: Bloody whinging poms - if YOU personally don't have an interest, or the abilities, to use IRLP then please do the world a favour and just SHUT THE HELL UP!! The entire world does NOT bow down to the wishes and desires of the UK, despite what you may think.... It isn't the good old days of the colonies when people actually gave a rats what pommies had to say... There, there. Go and lie down in a dark room for a few hours. It'll feel much better in the morning. :-))) 73 de G3NYY He goes Walty again, **TROLLING** for the day |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:46:31 +1100, G-S wrote: This way the republic is still on the agenda and there is likely to be another referendum in the medium term (say the next 20 years), with a good chance it'll include a directly elected president (or Judge Advocate General) or whatever you want to call the re-named directly elected replacement for the govenor general. How did we get here from a single, vacuous posting about IRLP nonsense? ;-) 73 de G3NYY *******************************TROLL************** ************* |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:10:04 GMT, Concerned Amateur wrote: 73 de G3NYY *********************************TROLL************ ************* |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:27:27 GMT, "jim.gm4dhj" wrote: Walt wrote: Dear Simple Simon, I'll pass on your comments to G3NNY. (John is a friend of mine.) I'm sure he won't know what you're raving on about, however. I blame the heat......... I blame the witchetty grubs ........ 73 de G3NYY ************************************TROLL********* *********************** |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:45:45 GMT, "jim.gm4dhj" wrote: I blame the fact that they are up-side-down........and neighbours/home and away...... I blame their parents ... for dropping them on their heads when they were babies. 73 de G3NYY Irrelevant to Amateur Radio...*****************TROLL******************** ** |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Walt Davidson wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:17:41 +0000 (UTC), wrote: Well you see in Australian males at birth, the brain is found in a different body cavity, to where it is in other species. So it is traditional for the parents of the new-born baby, to drop it on its head in the usually vain hope the brain will drop down from that cavity, into the head. Ideally before the baby passes its first motion and the brain is lost forever. Nick. ROTFLMAO!!!! 73 de G3NYY ******** ONGOING BULL**** FROM TROLL AND FRIENDS***************************** |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ashley VK3HAG" wrote:
: 1st International IRLP Contest 2005 next... first international telephone contest. competitors to ring up as many internation phone numbers as possible. exchange greetings. itemised telephone bills to be submitted as log file. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Info |