Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the 8,500 mile
trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the statement "Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach. Most of our travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas including Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between. Not once were we called on 146.52. At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring Five Two", often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we receive a reply. Is .52 broken? 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the 8,500 mile trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the statement "Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach. Most of our travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas including Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between. Not once were we called on 146.52. At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring Five Two", often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we receive a reply. Is .52 broken? Perhaps they forgot to disable thier K0HB filters? Had you been in SE Tennessee and I had seen you, you would have gotten a call. But on the same note, there's been quite a few occassions where I've passed/been passed by a vehicle with Amateur tags (or some other "callsign" display), and had my hails go unanswered. On the other hand, I've gotten several calls, mostly from 18-wheeler Amateurs. Lots of those big rigs are Hams...guess they got tired of the 10-4 good buddy crowd. Glad you're home safe, Hans. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the 8,500 mile trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the statement "Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach. Most of our travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas including Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between. Not once were we called on 146.52. At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring Five Two", often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we receive a reply. Is .52 broken? Perhaps they forgot to disable thier K0HB filters? Had you been in SE Tennessee and I had seen you, you would have gotten a call. But on the same note, there's been quite a few occassions where I've passed/been passed by a vehicle with Amateur tags (or some other "callsign" display), and had my hails go unanswered. On the other hand, I've gotten several calls, mostly from 18-wheeler Amateurs. Lots of those big rigs are Hams...guess they got tired of the 10-4 good buddy crowd. Glad you're home safe, Hans. 73 Steve, K4YZ This is just a guess, but "maybe" 1. Any amateurs mobile that may have seen you, missed reading the bumper sticker because they're too busy watching the road? I know when I'm on the road and see a ham call sign bumper sticker or plate, I sure in hell am not going to detract from my driving to play guessing games trying to find them. That would be like a needle in a hay stack - IF they are even on the air at all. 2. They're on the "repeater" pairs - perhaps trying to get directions from a local person - because they didn't think they would have any luck monitoring 146.52! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the 8,500 mile trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the statement "Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach. Most of our travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas including Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between. Not once were we called on 146.52. At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring Five Two", often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we receive a reply. Is .52 broken? Perhaps they forgot to disable thier K0HB filters? Had you been in SE Tennessee and I had seen you, you would have gotten a call. But on the same note, there's been quite a few occassions where I've passed/been passed by a vehicle with Amateur tags (or some other "callsign" display), and had my hails go unanswered. On the other hand, I've gotten several calls, mostly from 18-wheeler Amateurs. Lots of those big rigs are Hams...guess they got tired of the 10-4 good buddy crowd. Glad you're home safe, Hans. 73 Steve, K4YZ I remember whenever you passed a ham or saw his tag that if you sent four beeps spaced and two more beeps on your horn you would get a friendly response. I don't bother anymore. Dan/W4NTI |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder what the 4 beeps and the 2 beeps are supposed to mean?
Paul Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the 8,500 mile trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the statement "Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach. Most of our travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas including Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between. Not once were we called on 146.52. At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring Five Two", often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we receive a reply. Is .52 broken? Perhaps they forgot to disable thier K0HB filters? Had you been in SE Tennessee and I had seen you, you would have gotten a call. But on the same note, there's been quite a few occassions where I've passed/been passed by a vehicle with Amateur tags (or some other "callsign" display), and had my hails go unanswered. On the other hand, I've gotten several calls, mostly from 18-wheeler Amateurs. Lots of those big rigs are Hams...guess they got tired of the 10-4 good buddy crowd. Glad you're home safe, Hans. 73 Steve, K4YZ I remember whenever you passed a ham or saw his tag that if you sent four beeps spaced and two more beeps on your horn you would get a friendly response. I don't bother anymore. Dan/W4NTI |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In case your question is serious and for others who may not know, in the days of telegraph before radio, operators would tell stories and jokes along an idle circuit. Since 4 dits followed by 2 dits sounds like a laugh -- and 4 beeps is H and 2 beeps is I
Sending HI HI in Morse was a telegraphic laugh and it naturally carried over to radio by CW ops. Used by many today in CW and indeed has carried over to phone as well. Well in passing a another Ham car -- sending HI in Morse is a Ham motorists Hello. So much in Amateur Radio jargon is from the telegraph days. Lets see if any one knows the origin of ES in Morse in lieu of the word AND ??? Answer tommorrow from CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be ! "Paul H. Wray" wrote in message ... I wonder what the 4 beeps and the 2 beeps are supposed to mean? Paul Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the 8,500 mile trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the statement "Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach. Most of our travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas including Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between. Not once were we called on 146.52. At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring Five Two", often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we receive a reply. Is .52 broken? Perhaps they forgot to disable thier K0HB filters? Had you been in SE Tennessee and I had seen you, you would have gotten a call. But on the same note, there's been quite a few occassions where I've passed/been passed by a vehicle with Amateur tags (or some other "callsign" display), and had my hails go unanswered. On the other hand, I've gotten several calls, mostly from 18-wheeler Amateurs. Lots of those big rigs are Hams...guess they got tired of the 10-4 good buddy crowd. Glad you're home safe, Hans. 73 Steve, K4YZ I remember whenever you passed a ham or saw his tag that if you sent four beeps spaced and two more beeps on your horn you would get a friendly response. I don't bother anymore. Dan/W4NTI |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use .52 aircraft mobile all the time and never have any trouble finding
somebody monitoring. Jim Is .52 broken? 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:14:18 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote: I use .52 aircraft mobile all the time and never have any trouble finding somebody monitoring. Jim Pretty good radio horizon up there, right, Jim? Ted KX4OM |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Poor Hans, so typical of today's ham radio ops, stuck in the archaic world
of 52 simplex, while the rest of the world is using Advanced Mobile Technology. "Why aren't young people interested in ham radio"? duhhhhhhhhhhh, lets demonstrate 52 simplex for them, maybe that'll get the kids interested. 73, Rabbi Phil "KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the 8,500 mile trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the statement "Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach. Most of our travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas including Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between. Not once were we called on 146.52. At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring Five Two", often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we receive a reply. Is .52 broken? 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rabbi Phil" wrote in message
... "Why aren't young people interested in ham radio"? Hi Phil, That's certainly a topic worthy of discussion. You could start a thread if you liked, but my question is related to simplex calling frequencies, not why Johnnie didn't pass the amateur exam. 72.5, de Hans, K0HB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
newbie GMRS questions | Policy | |||
CW Testing Question | Policy | |||
calling frequencies | Dx | |||
calling frequencies | Dx |