Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old March 31st 05, 03:00 AM
RST Engineering
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm a snob. I get ****ed off at reading a hundred lines of text to find two
or three lines of response.

Do you people really understand SNIPPING?

Jim


In fact I used to LIVE in Ft. Lauderdale Fla. Same thing, snobs.

Dan/W4NTI




  #22   Report Post  
Old March 31st 05, 04:11 AM
bob
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Or at least place the reply at the TOP of the message.


RST Engineering wrote:
I'm a snob. I get ****ed off at reading a hundred lines of text to find two
or three lines of response.

Do you people really understand SNIPPING?

Jim



In fact I used to LIVE in Ft. Lauderdale Fla. Same thing, snobs.

Dan/W4NTI





  #23   Report Post  
Old April 2nd 05, 12:40 AM
Tony VE6MVP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:29:44 -0800, "Caveat Lector"
wrote:

Funny they always answer my XYL though (;-)


chuckle Aha. I'll have a young lady record my call sign and
transmit it while driving every ten minutes and see what response I
get then.

Tony
  #24   Report Post  
Old April 3rd 05, 03:36 AM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K=D8HB wrote:
K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the

8,500 mile
trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the

statement
"Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach.

Most of our
travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas

including
Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco,

Austin,
San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe,

Phoenix,
Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between.

Not once were we called on 146.52.

At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring

Five Two",
often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we

receive a
reply.
=20
Is .52 broken?
=20
73, de Hans, K0HB


How was Quartzite?

  #25   Report Post  
Old April 4th 05, 02:56 AM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"William" wrote

How was Quartzite?


Drove through there once a few years ago.

It's the RV equivalent of 75-meter phone.

73, de Hans, K0HB







  #26   Report Post  
Old April 5th 05, 07:18 AM
Ted Bruce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:14:18 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

I use .52 aircraft mobile all the time and never have any trouble finding
somebody monitoring.

Jim

Pretty good radio horizon up there, right, Jim?

Ted KX4OM
  #27   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 02:00 AM
Paul H. Wray
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I wonder what the 4 beeps and the 2 beeps are supposed to mean?
Paul

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

KØHB wrote:
K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the

8,500 mile
trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the

statement
"Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach.

Most of our
travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas

including
Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco,

Austin,
San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe,

Phoenix,
Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between.

Not once were we called on 146.52.

At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring

Five Two",
often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we

receive a
reply.

Is .52 broken?


Perhaps they forgot to disable thier K0HB filters?

Had you been in SE Tennessee and I had seen you, you would have
gotten a call. But on the same note, there's been quite a few
occassions where I've passed/been passed by a vehicle with Amateur tags
(or some other "callsign" display), and had my hails go unanswered.

On the other hand, I've gotten several calls, mostly from
18-wheeler Amateurs. Lots of those big rigs are Hams...guess they got
tired of the 10-4 good buddy crowd.

Glad you're home safe, Hans.

73

Steve, K4YZ

I remember whenever you passed a ham or saw his tag that if you sent four
beeps spaced and two more beeps on your horn you would get a friendly
response.

I don't bother anymore.

Dan/W4NTI


  #28   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 02:01 AM
Paul H. Wray
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Please explain snipping, It might help more than complaining.
Paul

RST Engineering wrote:

I'm a snob. I get ****ed off at reading a hundred lines of text to find two
or three lines of response.

Do you people really understand SNIPPING?

Jim

In fact I used to LIVE in Ft. Lauderdale Fla. Same thing, snobs.

Dan/W4NTI



  #29   Report Post  
Old April 6th 05, 04:45 AM
Caveat Lector
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In case your question is serious and for others who may not know, in the days of telegraph before radio, operators would tell stories and jokes along an idle circuit. Since 4 dits followed by 2 dits sounds like a laugh -- and 4 beeps is H and 2 beeps is I

Sending HI HI in Morse was a telegraphic laugh and it naturally carried over to radio by CW ops. Used by many today in CW and indeed has carried over to phone as well.

Well in passing a another Ham car -- sending HI in Morse is a Ham motorists Hello.

So much in Amateur Radio jargon is from the telegraph days.

Lets see if any one knows the origin of ES in Morse in lieu of the word AND ???
Answer tommorrow from CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be !
"Paul H. Wray" wrote in message ...
I wonder what the 4 beeps and the 2 beeps are supposed to mean?
Paul
Dan/W4NTI wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
KØHB wrote:
K0CKB and I just returned from an 8-week RV vacation. During the

8,500 mile
trip we continuously monitored 146.52, and had our calls and the

statement
"Monitoring 146.52" prominently visible on the rear of our coach.

Most of our
travel was on busy Interstate highways, and in/near populous areas

including
Minneapolis, DesMoines, Kansas City, Topeka, Wichita, OKC, DFW, Waco,

Austin,
San Antonio, Corpus Christi, Brownsville, ElPaso, Las Cruces, Globe,

Phoenix,
Flagstaff, Tucson, Las Vegas, and points between.

Not once were we called on 146.52.

At every population center we announced "K0HB (or K0CKB) monitoring

Five Two",
often more than once.. On only one occasion (thanks WK5C) did we

receive a
reply.

Is .52 broken?


Perhaps they forgot to disable thier K0HB filters?

Had you been in SE Tennessee and I had seen you, you would have
gotten a call. But on the same note, there's been quite a few
occassions where I've passed/been passed by a vehicle with Amateur tags
(or some other "callsign" display), and had my hails go unanswered.

On the other hand, I've gotten several calls, mostly from
18-wheeler Amateurs. Lots of those big rigs are Hams...guess they got
tired of the 10-4 good buddy crowd.

Glad you're home safe, Hans.

73

Steve, K4YZ

I remember whenever you passed a ham or saw his tag that if you sent four
beeps spaced and two more beeps on your horn you would get a friendly
response.

I don't bother anymore.

Dan/W4NTI

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
newbie GMRS questions [email protected] Policy 10 December 16th 04 03:12 PM
CW Testing Question Mike Coslo Policy 52 May 29th 04 09:24 AM
calling frequencies clark neider Dx 2 August 4th 03 11:27 PM
calling frequencies clark neider Dx 0 August 4th 03 07:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017