Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
FCC fines K1MAN $21,000
from ARRL Website: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/06/14/100/?nc=1 on June 14, 2005 View comments about this article! http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-259301A1.html NEWINGTON, CT, Jun 14, 2005--The FCC has issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL) proposing to fine Glenn A. Baxter, K1MAN, of Belgrade Lakes, Maine, $21,000. In the NAL, released June 7, the FCC alleges that Baxter has violated several sections of the Part 97 Amateur Service Rules. The list includes rules proscribing interference with ongoing communications, transmitting communications in which he has a pecuniary interest, failure to provide information the FCC requested, engaging in broadcasting, and failure to exercise control of his station. In the NAL, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau recites a litany of correspondence over the past several months to and from Baxter--a registered professional engineer and executive director of the American Amateur Radio Association (AARA). "In response to numerous complaints of deliberate interference caused by transmissions from Mr Baxter's Amateur station K1MAN to ongoing radio communications of other stations, including stations participating in the Salvation Army Team Emergency Radio Net, the Bureau issued a Warning Notice to Mr Baxter on September 15, 2004," the NAL states. "The Bureau requested information from Mr Baxter with regard to the method of station control and what action, if any, was being taken in response to the complaints of interference." The FCC said its Warning Notice also recalled a written warning dated April 14, 2004, advising Baxter that enforcement action would be taken if he failed to correct the deliberate interference attributed to his station and if he continued to use his station for pecuniary interest by advertising his Web site. Baxter responded to the FCC Warning Notice on October 14, 2004, stating "no corrective actions are necessary at K1MAN" and that his means of station control "is in full compliance with all FCC rules" and that K1MAN "is in full compliance with all FCC rules, state laws, and federal laws." According to the FCC, Baxter concluded his reply by saying, "I encourage you to take 'enforcement actions' and look forward to seeing you in court(s)." Calling Baxter's response "insufficient," the FCC issued a second Warning Notice last October 29, spelling out his "obligations as a licensee to furnish the information requested by the Bureau." The Warning Notice also reported the receipt of two more complaints of deliberate interference allegedly caused by K1MAN. The FCC gave Baxter 20 more days to provide information regarding the identity of the control operator and his method of station control on the dates and times specified in the recent interference complaints. The FCC says Baxter responded last November 2 to indicate that his previous response had "provided all the information required by FCC rules and by federal law." He did not offer any information regarding the identity of the control operator or the method of station control, the FCC added. The NAL also cites monitoring of K1MAN by FCC personnel and asserts that last November 27, "K1MAN began transmitting on top of ongoing communications at 5:54 PM EST on 3.890 MHz, disrupting the communications by other licensees." It alleged similar occurrences on December 8 and March 31. FCC personnel from Boston inspected Baxter's station last November 30. During that visit, the FCC said, Baxter demonstrated that he could control his station's transmitter using a telephone interface. "Mr Baxter claimed that he monitored the station from a mobile receiver when not at the transmitter and that he could control the transmitter through a land-line or cellular phone," the NAL recounted. The FCC said last December 1, K1MAN transmitted "a pre-recorded program lasting nearly seventy minutes, which consisted of an interview by Mr Baxter with Mr Jeff Owens." The Commission contends that the transmission "consisted of a lengthy broadcast of the telephone interview with Mr Owens" during which, it says, Baxter explained how Owens could invest in franchises of Baxter Associates--a management consulting, executive search and executive career management enterprise--and how Baxter planned to market franchises of Baxter Associates. "Nothing in the program related to Amateur Radio, and no station call sign was given until the conclusion of the seventy-minute program," the FCC stated. The Commission said the transmission constituted a broadcast and an impermissible one-way transmission. On December 19, 2004, the Commission asserts, K1MAN "broadcast transmissions of an apparently defective pre-recorded audio tape, which resulted in the repeated transmission of a nine-word phrase, and segments thereof, without any intervention of a control operator and without the identification of the station's call sign." The transmission lasted some 46 minutes, the Commission reported, noting that Baxter's station shut down abruptly in mid-sentence. The FCC said this incident indicated that the control operator did not have sufficient control over his station. The Commission says on March 30, 2005, on at least four occasions on 3.890 MHz its monitoring personnel observed K1MAN advertising the AARA Web site, which "offers various products for sale." It concluded that those mentions and the transmission of the Baxter Associates interview violated FCC Amateur Service rules "by transmitting communications regarding matters in which he has a pecuniary interest." The FCC further concluded that Baxter failed to supply information it had requested in its warning notices of last September 15 and October 29. Baxter has 30 days to pay the fine or file a written statement seeking a reduction or cancellation of the proposed fine. ------------------------------------------ It's about time the FCC dealt with K1MAN! Ace - WH2T |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|