N9OGL wrote:

The rules should also apply to W1AW who has also caused malicious
interference.


Todd,

If you substitute "incidental" or "unintentional" for your use of
*malicious*, I might agree with your premise, at least on the surface.
However...

N9OGL wrote:

The problem is W1AW is allowed to interfere with on going
transmissions and K1MAN isn't.

....the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

-73-
Carter
K8VT

Carter-K8VT wrote:



...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

Toddyboy can't relate to what you are saying, he wants to be another
K1MAN and 'broadcast'.

...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00

On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" said in
rec.radio.scanner:

my view is that all who cause interference should pay.

The FCC doesn't share your view.

Al Klein wrote:
On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" said in
rec.radio.scanner:


my view is that all who cause interference should pay.


The FCC doesn't share your view.


And it's the FCC's view that counts, toddyboys view doesn't count for
anything.

"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...
...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00


I have decided to start a new net....I pick 14.321. I will be replaying
ARRL bulletins and information from RAIN. Then claim it as original. I
will also be using a prompt from Walter Cronkike, even tho his lawyers
asked me to stop.

Then if anyone interferes with me I will send out "Felony affidavits".

What you think Toad? Looks like your future to me.

Dan/W4NTI

On 23 Sep 2005 17:29:11 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote:

...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.

doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.


Including the interference your splatter is causing on this
group?

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00