Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 05, 01:39 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Gee TOM....do you think you had problem on the "National Simplex Frequency"
of 146.52 because you are NOT SUPPOSED TO USE IT for contesting?


But... but! That must be the ARRL's fault too, Dan! If Tom wants to
call Field day CQ on his cell phone, he should be able to......

Sorry, just getting a little carried away..


- Mike KB3EIA -
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 05, 03:13 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ROFL Mike, great follow-up.

What he likely did was to transmit a series of CQs on an emergency
distress frequency.

Damn, this guy posts that he has a 75-watt transmitter and a high gain
antenna 30-ft above the ground and he is clueless as to why he made few
QSOs. As clueless as this dork must be, maybe it's time to toughen up
the licensing requirement to what they were around1959!!!!!

He should be operating on CB and not ham radio channels!

Harry C.

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 05, 06:40 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Gee TOM....do you think you had problem on the "National Simplex
Frequency" of 146.52 because you are NOT SUPPOSED TO USE IT for
contesting?


But... but! That must be the ARRL's fault too, Dan! If Tom wants to call
Field day CQ on his cell phone, he should be able to......

Sorry, just getting a little carried away..


- Mike KB3EIA -


And he will probably get similar results. Perhaps he could then write
"another" BS note and bad mouth the ARRL. Makes sense to me......

Dan/W4NTI


  #4   Report Post  
Old October 4th 05, 12:01 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

Gee TOM....do you think you had problem on the "National Simplex
Frequency" of 146.52 because you are NOT SUPPOSED TO USE IT for
contesting?


But... but! That must be the ARRL's fault too, Dan! If Tom wants to call
Field day CQ on his cell phone, he should be able to......

Sorry, just getting a little carried away..


- Mike KB3EIA -



And he will probably get similar results. Perhaps he could then write
"another" BS note and bad mouth the ARRL. Makes sense to me......


I am just amazed that he was calling on the wrong frequency, and
managed to extrapolate so much from it. He probably should read "The
Three Blind Men and the Elephant" - at least they got a little bit
right... 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 June 26th 04 01:42 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 25th 04 07:29 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 June 16th 04 11:30 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 June 16th 04 08:37 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 Radionews Policy 1 July 20th 03 02:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017