Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Anon wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you! We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Take your Lithium Woger.
Vertially challenged Boy. ROTFLMAO! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Anon wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you! We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? We know Riley didn't fine you. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Lisping cocksucker II wrote: Anon wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........ I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy. You poor, poor sods! You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of "2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents. Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey???? AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you! We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly tune (see the selection for download!). An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing the fish! You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that. Sort of like those 4 letters you recieved from him (Riley), dumbass. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent you sound like "no reason"??? Still in denial, are you? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine
Yassar wrote: Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent you sound like "no reason"??? Yet the retest letter that has been posted ad nauseum gives no reason like "interference" for the retest. Still in denial, are you? You're still a ****ing imbecile, aren't you? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
AB8MQ is in denial again
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. .............................................. To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter to you) "citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at...." Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig. Learn to read, Pig. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
AB8MQ's "detractors" show thay have their heads up their asses
Who said I was Roger? wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ Who said anything about a fine, Roger? Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass. We know Riley didn't fine you. Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up as usual. He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not 'invited') that you retest. But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to read. ............................................. To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter to you) No, that is taken from the ARRL press release in the enforcement letters news section. "citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at...." Yet the actual retest letter that has been posted many times gives no reason. You lose, ****nuts. Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig. You should know, FATASSED pig. And, quit sucking so many cocks, your lisp is showing. Learn to read, Pig. Learn to read an actual letter from the FCC versus one from the ARRL news section's take on the subject, dumbass! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
JACK FM | Broadcasting | |||
FCC levies $10,000 fine for unlicensed operation | Broadcasting | |||
FCC issues forfeiture order against Jack Gerrittsen, formerly KG6IRO | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx |