Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 6th 05, 02:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine

Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

  #2   Report Post  
Old December 6th 05, 02:58 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Anon
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine


wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????

We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing
the fish!



  #3   Report Post  
Old December 6th 05, 09:10 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
N0VFP
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine


Anon wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????


AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you!


We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing
the fish!


You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty.

  #4   Report Post  
Old December 6th 05, 10:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Lithium Boy
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine

Take your Lithium Woger.

Vertially challenged Boy.

ROTFLMAO!




  #5   Report Post  
Old December 6th 05, 10:51 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Woger II
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine


Anon wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????


AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you!


We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters,

but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are

disturbing
the fish!


You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger? We know Riley didn't fine you. He
merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not
'invited') that you retest.
Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that.






  #6   Report Post  
Old December 9th 05, 10:03 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
N0VFP
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine


Lisping cocksucker II wrote:
Anon wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????


AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you!


We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters,

but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are

disturbing
the fish!


You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?


Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.


Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not
'invited') that you retest.


But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.

Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that.


Sort of like those 4 letters you recieved from him (Riley), dumbass.

  #7   Report Post  
Old December 9th 05, 11:58 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Yassar
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine



Who said anything about a fine, Roger?


Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.


Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated

(not
'invited') that you retest.


But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.


No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent
you sound like "no reason"???
Still in denial, are you?


  #8   Report Post  
Old December 15th 05, 02:11 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine


Yassar wrote:
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?


Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.


Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated

(not
'invited') that you retest.


But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.


No reason? Did Riley's mention of malicious interference in the letters sent
you sound like "no reason"???


Yet the retest letter that has been posted ad nauseum gives no reason
like "interference" for the retest.


Still in denial, are you?


You're still a ****ing imbecile, aren't you?

  #9   Report Post  
Old December 10th 05, 06:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
Who said I was Roger?
 
Posts: n/a
Default AB8MQ is in denial again





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?


Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.


Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated

(not
'invited') that you retest.


But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.
..............................................
To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter
to you)

"citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20
meters. "This interference has occurred at...."

Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig.
Learn to read, Pig.






  #10   Report Post  
Old December 15th 05, 02:16 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
 
Posts: n/a
Default AB8MQ's "detractors" show thay have their heads up their asses


Who said I was Roger? wrote:


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?


Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.


Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated

(not
'invited') that you retest.


But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
read.
.............................................
To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter
to you)


No, that is taken from the ARRL press release in the enforcement
letters news section.


"citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20
meters. "This interference has occurred at...."


Yet the actual retest letter that has been posted many times gives no
reason. You lose, ****nuts.


Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig.


You should know, FATASSED pig. And, quit sucking so many cocks, your
lisp is showing.

Learn to read, Pig.


Learn to read an actual letter from the FCC versus one from the ARRL
news section's take on the subject, dumbass!



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JACK FM [email protected] Broadcasting 0 July 28th 05 11:56 PM
FCC levies $10,000 fine for unlicensed operation Mike Terry Broadcasting 11 January 31st 05 07:43 PM
FCC issues forfeiture order against Jack Gerrittsen, formerly KG6IRO Splinter Policy 1 December 14th 04 11:16 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 June 25th 04 07:32 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017