LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old December 17th 05, 09:13 PM posted to,
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine

You still have told us all what you plan to do about it.......lying
again steve??


  #32   Report Post  
Old December 20th 05, 03:48 AM posted to,
Posts: n/a
Default stveie whines somemore

On 17 Dec 2005 06:22:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

On 13 Dec 2005 06:04:23 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

Yes...the rowdy and the reckless.

But beware the "Feeble Five."

true to form

As is this, Markie...(not ot mention the FORGED e-mail alias
above...You're really rackin' em up, PaganBoy!)

just trying to catch up with you stevie boy

everyone should be advised that The following person...(SNIP)

Still broadcasting a phone number that doesn't belong to me.

then why do you care?

more of stevie protesting too much

One MarkieLie after another.

Mark Morgan is a pathological liar.

stevie does not not know the meaning of the phrase

Steve, K4YZ

everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders making false charges of child rape, rape in general forges post and name

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

151 12TH AVE NW

Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download to open account
  #33   Report Post  
Old December 20th 05, 06:37 AM posted to,,,
an old friend
Posts: n/a
Default stevie ****

Who said I was Roger? wrote:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger?

Who said I was Roger, dumbass? You see him behind every post, dumbass.

We know Riley didn't fine you.

Last time I checked, I wasn't Roger, either. Looks like you ****ed up
as usual.

He merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated

'invited') that you retest.

But no reason was given why Wiseman had to retest, stupid. Learn to
To show reason, "Not Roger", read below. (taken from a Hollingsworth letter
to you)

No, that is taken from the ARRL press release in the enforcement
letters news section.

"citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20
meters. "This interference has occurred at...."

Yet the actual retest letter that has been posted many times gives no
reason. You lose, ****nuts.

Color it what you will Woger, but a pig in the poke is still a pig.

You should know, FATASSED pig. And, quit sucking so many cocks, your
lisp is showing.

Learn to read, Pig.

Learn to read an actual letter from the FCC versus one from the ARRL
news section's take on the subject, dumbass!

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JACK FM [email protected] Broadcasting 0 July 28th 05 11:56 PM
FCC levies $10,000 fine for unlicensed operation Mike Terry Broadcasting 11 January 31st 05 07:43 PM
FCC issues forfeiture order against Jack Gerrittsen, formerly KG6IRO Splinter Policy 1 December 14th 04 11:16 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 June 25th 04 07:32 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.

About Us

"It's about Radio"


Copyright © 2017