Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an old friend" wrote what proof? Proof? You want proof? I'm right, and you're wrong, and I can provide the mathematical proof. It is obvious, even to you, that the opposite of right is left and that three lefts make a right or 3l = r. It is also clear that wrong is the opposite of right so -w = r. So this would make 3l = r = -w which means that 3l = -w. Now, since left is the opposite of right (-l = r) this would mean l = r = -w, which playing with the math gives me l = -r = w and so left is the same as wrong (yes, I could have done this in fewer steps, but I didn't feel like doing that). Now, since l = w and 3l = r that would make 3w = r. This means that three wrongs make a right. Of course, since 3 is an odd number, this situation doesn't work out with any values for r and w except 0 which would mean that r = 0 and w = 0 and l = 0, although the last one I don't really care about. This means that right and wrong are mathematically identical and so classifying things as right or wrong is pointless because both of them are the same. And since there is no difference between right and wrong, that would make ME always right and YOU always wrong and isn't that the thing that rrap is all about? 2 + 2 = 8 if you assign sufficiently large values to 2. Warmest personal wishes for the holiday, de Hans, K0HB -- If a `religion' is defined to be a system of ideas that contains unprovable statements, then Kurt Godel taught us that mathematics is not only a religion, it is the only religion that can prove itself to be one. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
General purpose logger | Dx | |||
Good general purpose TO-92 p-channel FET? | Homebrew | |||
Anyone Have Info on Rock County Wisconsin? | Scanner | |||
General purpose whip for scanner + ham? | Scanner | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy |