an Old friend wrote:

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs


Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

an Old friend wrote

There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs

I suspect that the ARRL is rather more representative of hams in the US
than the RSGB is of hams in the UK, but there's something in what you
say. By and large, citizens respond to corrupt "leaders" by working
longer hours, drinking more alcohol, and blaming the French and the
Arabs. OTOH, the opportunity is there for hams to cut out the middlemen
and tell the government agency what they want.

--
Hil

Know Code wrote:
an Old friend wrote:

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs


Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.

in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

an_old_friend wrote:
Know Code wrote:

an Old friend wrote:


well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs


Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment

Care to put that in English?


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

Know Code wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Know Code wrote:

an Old friend wrote:
cut
Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment

Care to put that in English?

it is in english

learn to read though a few typos

or better still you could up to be at least ateenager in mental state


--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

Hils wrote:

Pun Krocker wrote

If I was a member I would resign.......

Seconded!

There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

Some of us have been doing this for a number of years. Perhaps that
input helped persuade OFCOM to do some surveys....

from
Aero Spike

You seem to be a Confused Babbler (CBer)

You have just upbraided me for discussing matters
of Britland, and now, here you are doing the same,
because Ofcom is a Britland institution.

(Cross-posted to rec.radio.cb to put you back where you
belong; you certainly exhibited Childish Broadcasting (CB)
in your recent posts)

an Old friend wrote:
Hils wrote:
There's nothing stopping non-members from writing to Ofcom explaining
why they're non-members, and making representations as individuals (for
example, requesting a review of the current licensing scheme).

well making a gues based on how things in Americe Vsav the ARRL and FCC
the indivgual Hams are largely un willing to stand up and say something
with some kind of Occifcail scation for it, this si likly why there
were about 3000 coment the recent NPRM here in the USA out of 600,000
hams and about 300,000 arrl memebrs

an_old_friend wrote:
Know Code wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Know Code wrote:


an Old friend wrote:

cut

Are you drunk, or just using so-called 'American' English.


in point of fact not either I am dyslexic and simply spell badly

you are crssos your drivel to RRAP so RRAP regaulara like myself it and
coment

Care to put that in English?


it is in english

learn to read though a few typos

Few? Now there's the understatement of the year!



--

I fully support the Know Code debate.
Loud is Good. It lets you trample over M3s and other undesirables.

Orator For Decency wrote:
You seem to be a Confused Babbler (CBer)

poor coward always afraid of THEM

"an Old friend" wrote:

why is this xxxx being corsposeted to the states it concerns england
and english affair it is not the place of American has to make coment
on it


i dunno... why is it ?