Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have not been able to establish the name and address of the
school in Strood, Kent, where he teaches. I would be grateful if anyone can furnish this information,so that I can make representations supported by evidence to the governors to seek that Brian Reay be dismissed because of his history of racially-aggravated pornographic publishing. "G.A.Evans G4SDW" wrote in message ... I did no more than to assert the right of reply in defence when I asserted that no-one with such a sick-minded history of international publishing should be a school teacher UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. I hold to that view today. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Au contraire! HOMEBREW is possibly the last
bastion of _REAL_ Ham Radio to be found anywhere on Usenet, and therefore the place to which intending like-minders will turn. Therefore, rec.radio.amateur.homebrew is the IDEAL newsgroup to which the FAQ should not only be posted, but regularly so! "AF6AY" wrote in message oups.com... Try confining it to uk.radio.amateur or maybe rec.radio.amateur.misc. It doesn't belong in HOMEBREW |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.A.Evans G4SDW" wrote:
A necessary preface..... snip While I agree with some of what you say about slipping standards, nevertheless numbers are shrinking and new blood must be encouraged into the hobby/pastime/service/pursuit, etc, else we will be gradually whittled away like the dodo until the bands are so empty that governments will gleefully sell off our slices of the RF spectrum. Admittedly, some of this new blood might not be of the 'quality' of some of the old, but among the new intake there are individuals with plenty of enthusiasm, curiosity, inventiveness and manners to make up for the minority that might dismay some of the old guard. I've a feeling that some / most of the coarser new licencees will not have the staying power and we will not hear of them after a couple of years. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I disagree totally.
There is not now, nor there has there ever been, a need, desperate or otherwise, to get "new blood". There are more licensees today than there were in the late 70's just prior to the influx of CB hobbyist operators. If the "new blood" propaganda is allowed to develop, we will end up with a Mongolian Horde of non-techical turnip-brains, the perception of which by govt agencies will result in a faster regulation of the technical freedoms we enjoy. It is far, far better to proceed with technical seed-corn and to retain our technical privileges, even with reduced numbers. "Bob" wrote in message ... "G.A.Evans G4SDW" wrote: A necessary preface..... snip While I agree with some of what you say about slipping standards, nevertheless numbers are shrinking and new blood must be encouraged into the hobby/pastime/service/pursuit, etc, else we will be gradually whittled away like the dodo until the bands are so empty that governments will gleefully sell off our slices of the RF spectrum. Admittedly, some of this new blood might not be of the 'quality' of some of the old, but among the new intake there are individuals with plenty of enthusiasm, curiosity, inventiveness and manners to make up for the minority that might dismay some of the old guard. I've a feeling that some / most of the coarser new licencees will not have the staying power and we will not hear of them after a couple of years. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
While I agree with some of what you say about slipping standards, nevertheless numbers are shrinking and new blood must be encouraged into the hobby/pastime/service/pursuit, etc, Why do people continue to propagate this myth? The Amateur Service is not dying, and never has been, and the numbers are not falling. Even the IARU quite clearly state this in their document "SPECTRUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMATEUR AND AMATEUR-SATELLITE SERVICES Revised August 2006" at http://www.iaru.org/ac-spec06.html When referring to the 7MHz allocation, the IARU say "The amateur service requirement continues to be for at least a 300-kHz allocation. This requirement is even greater today than in the past, owing to the increasing number of amateur stations and the expanding diversity of modes of emission used in the amateur service". Note the phrase "increasing number of amateur stations"! When referring to the 14MHz allocation, the IARU say "The growth of the amateur service and its heavy dependence on this band for international communication....". Note the phrase "the growth of the amateur service". This doesn't sound like anything that is dying. The only people who try to propagate the myth that the Amateur Service is dying are those who have a financial interest (national societies through membership numbers and equipment manufacturers/retailers). Don't listen to them. Instead, turn on your radio and listen to that instead.... you will find it is busier than ever! The latest data available on the IARU website at http://www.iaru.org/statsum00.html (bottom of the page) shows the number of licensed amateurs from 1965-2000. In 2000 the number was at the highest ever, so where is the evidence to back up the 'dying' theory? However, the number of licensed amateurs who were also members of their national society was at the LOWEST number ever (19.6% in 2000 compared to 38.6% in 1965). There are too many people with no real interest in amateur radio who are continually pushing to have the standards lowered so that they can gain financially from it. They do this by lying through their teeth that amateur radio is dying and use scare tactics that we will lose allocations. It is time to put a stop to this! -- ARRL membership = $39 (~£20) RSGB membership = £44 Don't let them rip you off any more. Do the right thing, resign from the RSGB today. The RSGB said Radio Amateurs were a threat to national security! Is this the type of organisation you want to represent you? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
know code wrote:
This doesn't sound like anything that is dying. The only people who try to propagate the myth that the Amateur Service is dying are those who have a financial interest (national societies through membership numbers and equipment manufacturers/retailers). Don't listen to them. Instead, turn on your radio and listen to that instead.... you will find it is busier than ever! That's one good reason, but don't forget those Hams who are tired and bitter and just want to complain. Especially the ones who can't put up a decent antenna, and think the lack of signals means that no one is on the air! ;^) - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
M3OSN gets everywhere!
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... That's one good reason, but don't forget those Hams who are tired and bitter and just want to complain. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.A.Evans G4SDW" wrote in message ... M3OSN gets everywhere! "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... That's one good reason, but don't forget those Hams who are tired and bitter and just want to complain. (give this post a few hours...Mark will soon crap on it) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the mystifying inabillity to progress beyond the
level of exams set for 6-year-olds. "Walt Davidson" wrote in message ... Also, much of the "new blood" of which you speak actually consists of people aged in their 50s, 60s and 70s ... not youngsters in the first flush of youth. These people have a high disposable income and plenty of time on their hands. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Walt Davidson wrote: The fact that the amateur radio population is ageing has actually *increased* band occupancy, because many radio amateurs nowadays are retired and are now able to spend many more hours on the air, especially on weekdays. Also, much of the "new blood" of which you speak actually consists of people aged in their 50s, 60s and 70s ... not youngsters in the first flush of youth. These people have a high disposable income and plenty of time on their hands. The amount of AM being used on 80m is also a very encouraging sign; seemingly contacts can be had at almost any time, and on any phone-section frequency. Special nets need not be used to get contacts, if the onservations of my tuning around are typical. -- from Aero Spike |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|