Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have bolts thru the lams have you torqued them to the point of
twisting them off? If you haven't you might want to loosen then and add some more varnish to the lams while they're loose and then torque them. Another possibility: Many of the transformers in microwave ovens have a bead of weld across all the laminations and I've seen this on rectifiers used in Telco applications. Keeps them quiet and I and has some negatives like letting line spikes thru but on a filament that is meaningless. Lam eddy currents area dead issue as I've heard that the old Bell Labs had accepted this practice. I had a 30S-1 with minor buzz but when I added 100 volts to the screen the hum was about to drive me nuts but torquing to lams solved the problem, I twisted off a couple of bolts. -- 73 Hank WD5JFR "raypsi" wrote in message ... Hey all: I tore down a transformer I got from ebay it was a Zenith TV power transformer from days gone by. Re wound it with 17AWG wire on the secondary and primary. It powers up my 4-1000A filament nicely with 7.25VAC from 120VAC mains. I used a penta-filar winding on the secondary. Shimmed the bobbin in the core window with some 1/8 thick virgin teflon. Epoxied the windings to the bobbin. This was a 240VA transformer and now is a 83watt buzzer / 157watt filament transformer. So what is the cheapest I can gits away with sealing these laminations from buzzing, I used up all my epoxy sealing the windings. 73 n8zu |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm!
Bolts through the laminations should have insulators (usually fiber board washers) under the heads. Just one end will do, there's no need for them under the nuts. But shoulder washers are best so the bolts don't short any laminations together deeper into the core. If uninsulated the bolt can form a poorly coupled shorted turn and that in itself can cause noise, heating of the core and the hardware as well as spray flux around where you wouldn't have expected any. How bad it is depends on the locations of the holes in the core. A bead of weld across the ends of the laminations won't add to the eddy currents significantly. Steel isn't a great conductor. The weld's cross section is small and it's very poorly coupled to the primary. Why would a weld across the laminations let line spikes though? "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in : If you have bolts thru the lams have you torqued them to the point of twisting them off? If you haven't you might want to loosen then and add some more varnish to the lams while they're loose and then torque them. Another possibility: Many of the transformers in microwave ovens have a bead of weld across all the laminations and I've seen this on rectifiers used in Telco applications. Keeps them quiet and I and has some negatives like letting line spikes thru but on a filament that is meaningless. Lam eddy currents area dead issue as I've heard that the old Bell Labs had accepted this practice. I had a 30S-1 with minor buzz but when I added 100 volts to the screen the hum was about to drive me nuts but torquing to lams solved the problem, I twisted off a couple of bolts. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Grumpy
Years ago in 93 or so on a Telco fiber system by Alcatel we took severe hits when the air conditioner came on and it was traced to the station rectifier. The Gould rectifiers had a weld bead and when we replaced them another make which I can't recall that didn't have weld beads the problem went away. Its quite strange since the rectifiers floated big batteries but a vco in system was sensitive to the spike. After doing some research I found an explanation that I can't recall because I was too busy with other problems and mine had gone away. Alcatel spent several hundred thousand trying to find the problem and I stumbled on to it by shear luck. 73 Hank WD5JFR "Grumpy The Mule" wrote in message ... Hmmm! Bolts through the laminations should have insulators (usually fiber board washers) under the heads. Just one end will do, there's no need for them under the nuts. But shoulder washers are best so the bolts don't short any laminations together deeper into the core. If uninsulated the bolt can form a poorly coupled shorted turn and that in itself can cause noise, heating of the core and the hardware as well as spray flux around where you wouldn't have expected any. How bad it is depends on the locations of the holes in the core. A bead of weld across the ends of the laminations won't add to the eddy currents significantly. Steel isn't a great conductor. The weld's cross section is small and it's very poorly coupled to the primary. Why would a weld across the laminations let line spikes though? "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in : If you have bolts thru the lams have you torqued them to the point of twisting them off? If you haven't you might want to loosen then and add some more varnish to the lams while they're loose and then torque them. Another possibility: Many of the transformers in microwave ovens have a bead of weld across all the laminations and I've seen this on rectifiers used in Telco applications. Keeps them quiet and I and has some negatives like letting line spikes thru but on a filament that is meaningless. Lam eddy currents area dead issue as I've heard that the old Bell Labs had accepted this practice. I had a 30S-1 with minor buzz but when I added 100 volts to the screen the hum was about to drive me nuts but torquing to lams solved the problem, I twisted off a couple of bolts. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy Hank,
Thanks for the follow-up! Perhaps they used a voltage regulating transformer. I think some of the telcom rectifiers used them. I know some mainframe computers did. It's still a curiosity to me. Though I've seen enough occult behavior from wound magnetic devices that I wouldn't discount it, I'm tempted to wonder if there's another variable that was coincident with the welded laminations. 73 "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in : Grumpy Years ago in 93 or so on a Telco fiber system by Alcatel we took severe hits when the air conditioner came on and it was traced to the station rectifier. The Gould rectifiers had a weld bead and when we replaced them another make which I can't recall that didn't have weld beads the problem went away. Its quite strange since the rectifiers floated big batteries but a vco in system was sensitive to the spike. After doing some research I found an explanation that I can't recall because I was too busy with other problems and mine had gone away. Alcatel spent several hundred thousand trying to find the problem and I stumbled on to it by shear luck. 73 Hank WD5JFR |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Grump
A transformer is one of the simplest electrical machines and pretty well understood in the classical design but when some of the parameters are changed we don't have much experience or investigation and probably wont. Hot swappable rectifier modules have made transformer based rectifiers uneconomical kinda like carburetors and fuel injection. If you have the time, check with some of the old time designers of transformer rectifiers. Let me now what you find out. I had some notes but those are long gone. Hank "Grumpy The Mule" wrote in message ... Howdy Hank, Thanks for the follow-up! Perhaps they used a voltage regulating transformer. I think some of the telcom rectifiers used them. I know some mainframe computers did. It's still a curiosity to me. Though I've seen enough occult behavior from wound magnetic devices that I wouldn't discount it, I'm tempted to wonder if there's another variable that was coincident with the welded laminations. 73 "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in : Grumpy Years ago in 93 or so on a Telco fiber system by Alcatel we took severe hits when the air conditioner came on and it was traced to the station rectifier. The Gould rectifiers had a weld bead and when we replaced them another make which I can't recall that didn't have weld beads the problem went away. Its quite strange since the rectifiers floated big batteries but a vco in system was sensitive to the spike. After doing some research I found an explanation that I can't recall because I was too busy with other problems and mine had gone away. Alcatel spent several hundred thousand trying to find the problem and I stumbled on to it by shear luck. 73 Hank WD5JFR |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I left out switch based hot swappable
"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message ... Hey Grump A transformer is one of the simplest electrical machines and pretty well understood in the classical design but when some of the parameters are changed we don't have much experience or investigation and probably wont. Hot swappable rectifier modules have made transformer based rectifiers uneconomical kinda like carburetors and fuel injection. If you have the time, check with some of the old time designers of transformer rectifiers. Let me now what you find out. I had some notes but those are long gone. Hank "Grumpy The Mule" wrote in message ... Howdy Hank, Thanks for the follow-up! Perhaps they used a voltage regulating transformer. I think some of the telcom rectifiers used them. I know some mainframe computers did. It's still a curiosity to me. Though I've seen enough occult behavior from wound magnetic devices that I wouldn't discount it, I'm tempted to wonder if there's another variable that was coincident with the welded laminations. 73 "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in : Grumpy Years ago in 93 or so on a Telco fiber system by Alcatel we took severe hits when the air conditioner came on and it was traced to the station rectifier. The Gould rectifiers had a weld bead and when we replaced them another make which I can't recall that didn't have weld beads the problem went away. Its quite strange since the rectifiers floated big batteries but a vco in system was sensitive to the spike. After doing some research I found an explanation that I can't recall because I was too busy with other problems and mine had gone away. Alcatel spent several hundred thousand trying to find the problem and I stumbled on to it by shear luck. 73 Hank WD5JFR |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy Hank,
I've been designing switch mode magnetics for about thirty years now. The more I learn the less I know. It's true that the principles are well known but the implementation is a morass of compromises. At the power level many of my designs operate at, second and third order effects can suddenly become serious and unexpected design complications. Some people enjoy puzzles. I guess that's why I like designing this sort of stuff. I've worked on a lot of weird stuff, big cap charging supplies, pulse compressors, very high voltage or high current, and tiny stuff with extremely low noise outputs. But I don't have much experience with line frequency magnetics beyond EMI filters. As you say there's not much call for it now. But unfettered by all the weak components the big iron can support amazing overloads, so I think there's still a place for it. At least for now. The cost of steel and copper (and the transportation costs) for such heavy beasts is certainly making them increasingly less attractive. Lately I've been working on equipment in the 10KW-60KW output range switching at 75KHz range. The whole system weighs much less than just the line frequency transformer that would be required alone. The only big iron guys I know are now retired or dead. And the companies I've dealt with that make that stuff tend to have very little engineering staff, not much new going on, (other than some efficiency improvements from amorphous cores) they just crank out the product in cook book fashion. I think nuances of it may soon be a lost. 73 "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in : Hey Grump A transformer is one of the simplest electrical machines and pretty well understood in the classical design but when some of the parameters are changed we don't have much experience or investigation and probably wont. Hot swappable rectifier modules have made transformer based rectifiers uneconomical kinda like carburetors and fuel injection. If you have the time, check with some of the old time designers of transformer rectifiers. Let me now what you find out. I had some notes but those are long gone. Hank |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hey all:
A good trick for the lams is clear nail polish as you reassemble them. Just a quick wipe, as it'll spread as you squeeze in the last few lams under a "Quick-Grip" clamp. I could go to the nail shop get a peddicure and coat my lams at the same time. A great idea if only I could handle the fumes. Varnish is the best thing. Warm the varnish and the transformer first before you dunk it. That will reduce the viscosity and improve penetration. A little thinner in the pot may help too. I lucky I can stand the effects of epoxy but no way varnish. For nail polish or varnish I gots to gits me a up or down draft venilator exhastt system. If you have bolts thru the lams have you torqued them to the point of twisting them off? If you haven't you might want to loosen then and add some more varnish to the lams while they're loose and then torque them Thanks I retorqued them and that reduced the noise by 6db. Now I have a less effecient buzzer Bolts through the laminations should have insulators (usually fiber board washers) under the heads. Just one end will do, there's no need for them under the nuts. But shoulder washers are best so the bolts don't short any laminations together deeper into the core. Good idea I seen many a transformer that had fiber spacers over the whole length of the bolt plus fiber washers.. put the transformer into the box, and fill the box up with enough sand that you have 1-2 inches all around the transformer, and that might muffle the buzz. You'll need to worry about heat dissipation through that sand which will act like an insulator, but if you are on the air only a couple of hours per day, I likes this one, but I gots alot of kittie litter that comes from some place in Arkansas, it is mostly quartz and some other trace minerals. The only big iron guys I know are now retired or dead. And the companies I've dealt with that make that stuff tend to have very little engineering staff, not much new going on, (other than some efficiency improvements from amorphous cores) they just crank out the product in cook book fashion. I think nuances of it may soon be a lost. Yes lams are going the way of the dinosuars. Maybe that's why they cost so much looky the price of a good audio output transformer for a tube audio amplifier and they go up to at least 20Khz. Your other option is to figure out some clamping arrangement so that the laminations are held close and tight. Yes I think I will put together a vise of sorts. Custom made to fit the transformer. 73 and thanks for all the good information. n8zu |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:52:28 +0100 (CET), Grumpy The Mule
wrote: Hmmm! Bolts through the laminations should have insulators (usually fiber board washers) under the heads. Just one end will do, there's no need for them under the nuts. But shoulder washers are best so the bolts don't short any laminations together deeper into the core. If uninsulated the bolt can form a poorly coupled shorted turn and that in itself can cause noise, heating of the core and the hardware as well as spray flux around where you wouldn't have expected any. How bad it is depends on the locations of the holes in the core. A bead of weld across the ends of the laminations won't add to the eddy currents significantly. Steel isn't a great conductor. The weld's cross section is small and it's very poorly coupled to the primary. Why would a weld across the laminations let line spikes though? It's not just the laminations that make noise. The windings can vibrate if they're not locked in place with transformer varnish or epoxy. No amount of tightening the laminations will help if the windings are free to vibrate. This is probably more likely in larger higher power transformers (multiple kW) than in a filament or screen supply transformer, but it can happen. Also, depending on how much magnetic leakage your core has you can couple to the steel walls of the cabinetry the transformer is housed in if you don't maintain adequate spacing from the walls, in which case the steel wall and the transformer can vibrate and make noise even though no parts on the transformer are loose. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() That's a good point. The filthy leakge inductance will be spraying its flux all about. But there are things we can do a to contain it. A belly band around the winding (but not though the core) helps. End bells (covers) bolted down over the windows work too. There may also be fringing flux spewing out of the unavoidable gaps if it's a butt stack lamination core. Interleaving the laminations will help. I've done all of that on a design with the transformer mounted directly beneath the neck of the CRT in a video terminal. A requirment of the project manager because he feared SMPS noise and demanded a linear power supply. Of course everything had to be jammed into the smallest possible enclosure and a mu metal shield was deemed too expensive :P Jim Higgins wrote in : It's not just the laminations that make noise. The windings can vibrate if they're not locked in place with transformer varnish or epoxy. No amount of tightening the laminations will help if the windings are free to vibrate. This is probably more likely in larger higher power transformers (multiple kW) than in a filament or screen supply transformer, but it can happen. Also, depending on how much magnetic leakage your core has you can couple to the steel walls of the cabinetry the transformer is housed in if you don't maintain adequate spacing from the walls, in which case the steel wall and the transformer can vibrate and make noise even though no parts on the transformer are loose. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: 1000 VCT 6/5VAC XFORMER | Boatanchors | |||
What to do with lots of receivers and lots of antennas? | Shortwave | |||
Chicago Transformer Mod Transformer CMS-1 Specs wanted | Boatanchors | |||
SX-190 buzz in audio | Boatanchors | |||
SX-190 buzz in audio | Boatanchors |