Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, exray wrote: Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:30:24 -0400 From: exray Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling This is a really dumb question but it dawned on me that I did not know the correct answer. In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. (Stop me if I'm wrong already...) I think this is correct, but the books say that tuning the output of the oscillator can "pull" the frequency of the oscillating crystal. I have sometimes seen this. But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. In the last few years I have built many tube stages and observed the harmonic voltage output on a wideband oscilloscope. As a matter of fact if you ever get a wideband scope and look at the locked output waveform as you tune through the both the fundamental and the harmonic frequency you will be very surprised at what you will see. All of the descriptions in all of the handbooks I have read (a few) explain this from a theoretical perspective but don't bother to actually show, with photographs of actual scope traces, how this works. It would just take an extra page or two and would make people think about what they are doing. All amplifiers have some non-linearity, the question is what effect this has on you meeting "purity" of emissions requirements. The more important question is whether you are getting the gain/drive that you want from a given stage of amplification. Reducing unwanted spurious emissions might require more tuned circuits or measurement using a receive with an S-meter and operated many wavelengths from your antenna. Most "appliance operators" just buy a commercial rig and don't worry about anything; homebrewers might not worry either if their signals go through a tuned circuit, an antenna tuner, and an antenna for a narrow frequency range. If you really want to blow your mind, then hook an oscilloscope to the output of a mixer with two low harmonic content input sine waves to be mixed. The raw output will look like hell on a scope. The only way to see the mixed (say, difference) frequency will be to go through at least a couple of tuned circuits that are tuned for the wanted sine wave frequency. I've done this stuff. There are a couple of other minor matters that are not quite correct in our ham handbooks, too. TIA -Bill WX4A |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 22, 8:43*pm, Stray Dog wrote:
Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Telstar Electronics wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:20:56 -0800 (PST) From: Telstar Electronics Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Nov 22, 8:43*pm, Stray Dog wrote: Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. All tubes (and transistors, etc) have non-linearities (if the transfer characteristics are non-straight lines) if that is what you are talking about. However, I have observed output on a scope of second harmonics (and, yes, the time base was set right and auto-self triggering) and the amplifier was running no higher than Class B. You should actually try this yourself and see for yourself. Tune the output to the second harmonic and you will see grow out of the vally new "peaks" corresponding to that second harmonic. I don't know what the solid state gear is doing, but from many schematics of the vintage tube gear I'm familiar with show, and measure, biasing for linear operation, even in stages meant to multiply frequency. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ...
On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. The resultant waveform with the outputs in parallel will look like much like a full wave rectified version of the input signal subtracted from the plate voltage. To express this mathematically, let the input signal be expressed as: Vin = A sin(wt) Now let the voltage gain of each stage be "-k" and the plate voltage be "B". The resultant waveform of the two stages connected in parallel will be: Vout = B - abs[A*k sin(wt)] where "abs" is the absolute value Vout = B - A*k sin(wt) for 0 wt Pi and = B + A*k sin(wt) for Pi wt 2Pi or alternately for -Pi wt 0 We can then calculate the Fourier series of this waveform to determine its spectrum. I will not present the calculations here as it is too difficult to show the integration over defined integrals using only plain text (and I doubt many readers will have math fonts anyway). If you wish to see the math for the Fourier series for a number of functions, read: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~agp/calc3/notes2.pdf or http://www.physics.hku.hk/~phys2325/notes/chap7.doc. Vout = B - 2*A*K/Pi * [1 - SUMMATION {2*cos(nwt)/(n*n - 1)] for n=2, 4, 6, 8... Note that the original frequency has been eliminated and that only even order harmonics are present, and that the amplitudes drop off quite rapidly. For example, the fourth harmonic will be one fifth of the second harmonic. For those that need a simplified explanation of Fourier series, Don Lancaster wrote a good article that can be found at: http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse90.pdf. I always thought Don had a ham license but I could not find one. In a real implementation of this multiplier, a tuned circuit would be used as the plate load. The Q of this tuned circuit will assure that only the second harmonic is present in the output. The two stages would need to be well balanced if cancellation of odd harmonics and the fundamental is required. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ POSTSCRIPT: Now let me describe how it is possible to produce ONLY the second harmonic. Instead of using two Class B or AB stages, it is possible to use triodes operating where their plate current is proportional to the square of the grid voltage. Driving the two such stages in push-pull with the outputs in parallel with a resistive load, the output waveform will be: Vout = B - A*A*k sin(wt)*sin(wt) Using a trigonometric identity {see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities}, sin(x)*sin(x) = sin(x)^2 = 0.5[1-cos(2x)] thus Vout = B - A*A*K/2 + A*A*k/2 cos(2wt) This shows that only the second harmonic is found at the output. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NoSPAM wrote:
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM The resultant waveform with the outputs in parallel will look like much like a full wave rectified version of the input signal subtracted from the plate voltage. To express this mathematically, let the input signal be expressed as: Vin = A sin(wt) Now let the voltage gain of each stage be "-k" and the plate voltage be "B". The resultant waveform of the two stages connected in parallel will be: Vout = B - abs[A*k sin(wt)] where "abs" is the absolute value Vout = B - A*k sin(wt) for 0 wt Pi and = B + A*k sin(wt) for Pi wt 2Pi or alternately for -Pi wt 0 We can then calculate the Fourier series of this waveform to determine its spectrum. I will not present the calculations here as it is too difficult to show the integration over defined integrals using only plain text (and I doubt many readers will have math fonts anyway). If you wish to see the math for the Fourier series for a number of functions, read: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~agp/calc3/notes2.pdf http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/%7Eagp/calc3/notes2.pdfhttp://www.physics.hku.hk/%7Ephys2325/notes/chap7.doc or _http://www.physics.hku.hk/~phys2325/notes/chap7.doc http://www.physics.hku.hk/%7Ephys2325/notes/chap7.doc._ Vout = B - 2*A*K/Pi * [1 - SUMMATION {2*cos(nwt)/(n*n - 1)] for n=2, 4, 6, 8... Note that the original frequency has been eliminated and that only even order harmonics are present, and that the amplitudes drop off quite rapidly. For example, the fourth harmonic will be one fifth of the second harmonic. For those that need a simplified explanation of Fourier series, Don Lancaster wrote a good article that can be found at: http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse90.pdf. I always thought Don had a ham license but I could not find one. In a real implementation of this multiplier, a tuned circuit would be used as the plate load. The Q of this tuned circuit will assure that only the second harmonic is present in the output. The two stages would need to be well balanced if cancellation of odd harmonics and the fundamental is required. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ POSTSCRIPT: Now let me describe how it is possible to produce ONLY the second harmonic. Instead of using two Class B or AB stages, it is possible to use triodes operating where their plate current is proportional to the square of the grid voltage. Driving the two such stages in push-pull with the outputs in parallel with a resistive load, the output waveform will be: Vout = B - A*A*k sin(wt)*sin(wt) Using a trigonometric identity {see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities}, sin(x)*sin(x) = sin(x)^2 = 0.5[1-cos(2x)] thus Vout = B - A*A*K/2 + A*A*k/2 cos(2wt) This shows that only the second harmonic is found at the output. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Janssen" wrote in message
... NoSPAM wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM All that is really required is that the active devices have a different gain with positive input signals than with negative input signals. This is easily achieved with Class B and Class AB stages. As long as both stages are identical the fundamental and odd order harmonics will cancel. You are correct that with two Class A stages where the gain is identical for either polarity of input, the output signal will perfectly cancel. To make the method work here, you could synchronously switch the input signal between two perfectly linear stages. My point was that a full-wave rectified signal contains only even order harmonics. In the real world, as Stray Dog pointed out, ALL amplifier stages are nonlinear to some degree. The reason that Class AB and B amplifiers are considered linear RF amplifiers is that the tuned circuit on the output supplies supplies the "missing half" of the waveform. Without the tuned circuit, harmonics of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc. order as well as the fundamental are present. Odd order harmonics are only found if the gain is nonlinear for positive input signals. The tuned output stage passes the fundamental and suppresses the harmonics. Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
*Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Class A means that plate current is flowing throughout the entire cycle of the input wave with the tube operated between cutoff and saturation. It says nothing about the linearity of the tube's transconductance (plate current as a function of grid voltage). With real devices, the transconductance curve is ALWAYS nonlinear to some degree, producing distortion (and harmonics). As you decrease the drive to a single-ended Class A amplifier, you are working on a smaller and smaller portion portion of the transconductance curve which decreases distortion. In the limit where only an infinitesimal part of the transconductance curve is used, you will get no distortion and no harmonics. Of course, in this situation the tube produces NO output.while drawing current from the power supply. The scheme that I was talking about, known as a push-push doubler, generally uses the tubes operated in Class B although AB operation will work too, but it produces less harmonics. The real advantage of a push-push doubler is that odd order harmonics and the fundamental cancel out, making the resultant waveform easier to filter. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Telstar Electronics wrote: Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:16:29 -0800 (PST) From: Telstar Electronics Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote: *Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... You might want to consider qualifying your thinking on this by setting a specification for harmonic distortion (in other words, you might need to consider how much of that "clean sine wave" signal has other components in it, including non-harmonic componentes) pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... You might also want to consider, here, too, how much harmonic distortion THAT class A amplifier also causes which makes a contribution to the output. and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. You might even more also want to consider that any tuned circuit will pass energy not at the resonance of that tuned circuit. You would probably contribute to your own enlightenment if you actually did some real experiments on this. It does not take long to do. Back when I was an undergraduate student with major in physics (BS, 1966), I worked in a Mossbauer Effect spectrometer lab and we built most of our equipment (dual delay line pulse amplifiers, regulated DC power supplies, repairing survey meters, etc) my boss had me build a waveform converter that used a network of resistors and diodss to convert a sawtooth waveform to sine wave and he was doing this because the book he got the circuit from said that there would be less than 1% harmonic distortion and he was interested in that specification for the spectrometer drives and all of our commercial high quality signal generators were worse in that specification, particulary at the very low frequencies we ran the drives at (less than one cycle per second). So, you have to define what you mean by "clean sine wave." But, I'll also say that, no, you will not get nothing if you tune to the second harmonic and have a linear amplifier (unless, maybe, you have a _perfect_ sine wave and a _perfect_ linear amplifier [the rest of you guys might want to comment on this yeah, I know about Fourier analysis, too]). |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. No active device is perfect. I decided to illustrate the fact that a single ended triode operated in Class A can produce harmonics. For a tube, I used a 6C4 (1/2 of a 12AU7) operated with 300 volts on the plate, a grid bias voltage of -7 volts, driven with a pure sine wave of 14 volts peak-to-peak. The high driving voltage was chosen to illustrate my earlier points, but the stage _IS_ operated Class A with the plate current between cutoff and saturation. Since the "rec"groups are not supposed to have binaries in them, I placed the graphics as PDF attachments to a post entitled "Harmonics generated by a Class A stage" in the "alt.binaries.ham-radio" newsgroup. If anyone wishes to see these curves and their newsgroup provider does not provide this group, I apologize. I believe Google Groups may not provide binaries, so I suggest getting a real newsreader and a good newsfeed. The first graph is entitled "Transconductance.pdf" and it shows the plate current as a function of the grid voltage. This data was obtained directly from the General Electric datasheet, ET-T1604 dated March, 1960. Since Excel stinks when plotting and doing calculations with data that is not best expressed in a bar chart, I used an evaluation copy of PSIPlot from Poly Software International (http://www.polysoftware,com) to generate the plots. {Real scientists and engineers never use a bar chart except when making presentations to brain challenged management!} :-) The driving waveform and the resultant plate current waveform are shown in the graph entitled "Waveforms.pdf". The obvious flattening is due to cutoff being approached at the crest of the driving waveform. After all, the transconductance curve is not perfectly a straight line. Finally, the spectrum of current waveform is plotted in the graph called "Spectrum.pdf". The spectrum has been normalized with respect to the DC output. The scale of the X-axis is slightly off but it was not worth my time correcting it. The fundamental is about 60 to 70 percent of the DC output, and the second harmonic is about 40 percent of the DC output. All higher harmonic are less than one percent of the DC output except the fifth. Higher harmonics are still greater than one tenth of a percent of the DC up to the _13th_ harmonic. Harmonics beyond the 14th are still readily measured. In conclusion, even single ended Class A amplifiers generate harmonics. If a lower driving voltage were used, the amplitudes of the harmonics would be reduced, but the fundamental would also be reduced. Please follow-up to the "rec.radio.amateur.homebrew" newsgroup. Golden-eared audiophools will be ignored. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doubling car mileage secret!!! | CB | |||
Doubling a reference frequency | Homebrew |