| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Channel Jumper wrote:
Maybe I am out of line here, but what you are asking is dumb. Diplexers / Duplexers - what ever you want to call them are by nature only about 50% efficient. This means that you are throwing away half of your transmitted power and half of your capiable receive in the diplexer.. DUMB! It is not the diplexer that is dumb, it is your remark that is dumb. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Something like a diplexer | Homebrew | |||
| Diplexer | Homebrew | |||
| FS: Diamond MX-72N Diplexer | Swap | |||
| FS: Diamond MX-72N Diplexer | Swap | |||
| FS: Diamond MX-72N Diplexer | Swap | |||