Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 4:20 AM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message ... On 7/22/2014 2:03 AM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... On 7/21/2014 6:26 PM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... Yes, the knob protrudes, but the skirt of the knob is flush. I can't see how the arc of the key is important. Then you have not grasped the point of the discussion. Gareth, I typed a fair amount explaining my rational (which you snipped). Because it added nothing further. Ok, when you wish to have a discussion, let me know. Well, I was. But you were off on a different tack. I am beginning to understand why you get a lot of flack here. If you aren't interested in discussing the topic, why do you keep responding? I am beginning to think you truly can't help yourself. Here is another chance to discuss the topic. The movement of the end of the finger along the arc of the key does not need to be the same curve as the movement of the wrist because the finger provides compliance by bending at the other three joints, plus, the difference of movement of the two arcs is so miniscule, that it does not cause a problem in the first place. My father operated a telegraph key in his job as well as most of the people he worked with. None of them ever reported any sort of repetitive motion injury. BTW, I have the brass key he used. ![]() -- Rick |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rickman" wrote in message
... I am beginning to understand why you get a lot of flack here. If you aren't interested in discussing the topic, why do you keep responding? I am beginning to think you truly can't help yourself. Well, there you go again with the same bad behaviour for which you criticised Stuckle. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 4:27 AM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 4:20 AM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... On 7/22/2014 2:03 AM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... On 7/21/2014 6:26 PM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... Yes, the knob protrudes, but the skirt of the knob is flush. I can't see how the arc of the key is important. Then you have not grasped the point of the discussion. Gareth, I typed a fair amount explaining my rational (which you snipped). Because it added nothing further. Ok, when you wish to have a discussion, let me know. Well, I was. But you were off on a different tack. I am beginning to understand why you get a lot of flack here. If you aren't interested in discussing the topic, why do you keep responding? I am beginning to think you truly can't help yourself. Here is another chance to discuss the topic. The movement of the end of the finger along the arc of the key does not need to be the same curve as the movement of the wrist because the finger provides compliance by bending at the other three joints, plus, the difference of movement of the two arcs is so miniscule, that it does not cause a problem in the first place. My father operated a telegraph key in his job as well as most of the people he worked with. None of them ever reported any sort of repetitive motion injury. BTW, I have the brass key he used. ![]() Rick, His problem is he couldn't understand what you said, so it added nothing to the conversation *for him*. I thought your explanation was quite detailed and eloquent. Too bad the troll isn't smart enough to understand it. But then that's pretty typical for him. He does it regularly. And I see he couldn't understand this explanation, either. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 1:58 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... No, not a polymath. Polytroll is more like it. Polystoopid describes him exactly! It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. It remains you have to continue to troll because you can't find an audience anywhere else. Why don't you go back to your CB friends? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... No, not a polymath. Polytroll is more like it. Polystoopid describes him exactly! It remains you have to continue to troll because you can't find an audience anywhere else. Why don't you go back to your CB friends? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
... His problem is he couldn't understand what you said, so it added nothing to the conversation *for him*. I thought your explanation was quite detailed and eloquent. Too bad the troll isn't smart enough to understand it. But then that's pretty typical for him. He does it regularly. And I see he couldn't understand this explanation, either. It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 10:07 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... His problem is he couldn't understand what you said, so it added nothing to the conversation *for him*. I thought your explanation was quite detailed and eloquent. Too bad the troll isn't smart enough to understand it. But then that's pretty typical for him. He does it regularly. And I see he couldn't understand this explanation, either. It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. Ah, yes, the troll has to pop in even when no one is replying to him! Go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more, either? -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/2014 10:05 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... No, not a polymath. Polytroll is more like it. Polystoopid describes him exactly! It remains you have to continue to troll because you can't find an audience anywhere else. Why don't you go back to your CB friends? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. Just like you "played the role of the patient schoolteacher" with the judge? Got you shut up real quick, didn't it? Keep repeating it and you might actually start believing it! But no one else here will. Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... No, not a polymath. Polytroll is more like it. Polystoopid describes him exactly! It remains you have to continue to troll because you can't find an audience anywhere else. Why don't you go back to your CB friends? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? Just like you "played the role of the patient schoolteacher" with the judge? Got you shut up real quick, didn't it? Keep repeating it and you might actually start believing it! But no one else here will. Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It does not reflect very well on your character. Shame on you. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
... "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... His problem is he couldn't understand what you said, so it added nothing to the conversation *for him*. I thought your explanation was quite detailed and eloquent. Too bad the troll isn't smart enough to understand it. But then that's pretty typical for him. He does it regularly. And I see he couldn't understand this explanation, either. Ah, yes, the troll has to pop in even when no one is replying to him! Go back to your CB buddies. Or won't they talk to you any more, either? It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient schoolteacher dealing with you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school. You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It does not reflect very well on your character. Shame on you. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roy in action!! | Shortwave | |||
Mike States' arrant behavior needs corrective action. Why will eBay take no action? | Boatanchors | |||
looking for action sat | Policy | |||
Stevie Claims "action" more like missing in action most likely | Policy | |||
§97.1(a) and (e) in action | Policy |