RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Homebrew (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/)
-   -   Anyone ever had a fatal electric shock? (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/20942-anyone-ever-had-fatal-electric-shock.html)

Avery Fineman August 9th 03 08:46 PM

In article , "K Wind"
writes:

"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
.. .

The question seems daft, but bear with me, gentlemen. Has anyone ever
had an electric shock that they feel lucky to have survived?


Would 1,500VDC with 6mA capability flowing through one arm and out the other
be considered lethal? At one time, I knew how much current was considered
lethal, but have forgotten.


Think of "30-30" as a mnemonic.

If the source has over 30 Volts and can supply over 30 milliamperes
through the cardiac region, you will go into cardiac fibrilation.

High voltage with little supply current will affect the nerves and the
resulting muscle spasms can cause other kinds of injuries, some
that may be fatal.

DON'T DO IT. PAY ATTENTION!

Len Anderson
still living in the same reality I was born into...

Avery Fineman August 9th 03 08:46 PM

In article , "RP Henry" richard.p.henry@saic dot
com writes:

"Tom Sevart" wrote in message
...

"WB3FUP (Mike Hall)" wrote in message
...
10KV to fire magnetron in counter battery radar. Took six marines to stop
me from burying my screw driver in the chest of the asshole that thought

it
would be cute to push the radiate button.


I remember hearing the story of an Air Force tech working on a 30' radar
dish. For some dumb reason, someone energized it and promptly microwaved
him to death.

Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...


A Raytheon corporate legend is that one of the engineers discovered the
microwave oven principle when a radar melted a chocolate bar in his shirt
pocket.


That's been an Urban Legend for decades...probably a PR plant from
someone at Raytheon's Santa Barbara, CA, division that deveeloped
the RadaRange (originally a trademark of Raytheon before they sold that
consumer line to Amana).

========

While all the war stories and chit-chat are entertaining, please consider
a real-life tragedy that happened to a TV broadcast van in Los Angeles
last year. The van had stopped and erected its field-to-transmitter link
dish to Mount Wilson where the TV transmitter was. Standard
procedure here to get a clear shot above buildings and obstructions,
all the field vans have such erectable dishes.

Nobody in the field crew seems to have noticed that the van was under
a "high-line" of higher-voltage lines common in local area power
distribution. The dish and its two-section small crane came in contact
with the high-line. Somehow the kind of contact sent a good-sized
electrical power flow down into the van. A woman reporter was severely
burned in addition to being knocked unconscious...burns severe enough
to require amputation of part of an arm and part of a leg. She survived
but spent many months in the hospital and physical therapy, had to use
a wheelchair to get around even though active and healthy and not yet
40 before the accident.

This incident was clearly a result of STUPID NON-ATTENTION by the
TV field crew. That high-line distribution is common all over this city
and adjoining cities. To erect the link dish right into power wiring of
any kind was just compounding the stupidity.

I mention this because amateur radio nearly always involves outside
antennas in urban areas close to utility power wiring on poles. The
possibility of fatal or terrible electric shock isn't confined to some
radio-electronic box interior...it exists out in the open, in plain sight.
Keep it in mind to avoid frying that mind.

Len Anderson
retired (and still living) electronic engineer person

Avery Fineman August 9th 03 08:46 PM

In article , "RP Henry" richard.p.henry@saic dot
com writes:

"Tom Sevart" wrote in message
...

"WB3FUP (Mike Hall)" wrote in message
...
10KV to fire magnetron in counter battery radar. Took six marines to stop
me from burying my screw driver in the chest of the asshole that thought

it
would be cute to push the radiate button.


I remember hearing the story of an Air Force tech working on a 30' radar
dish. For some dumb reason, someone energized it and promptly microwaved
him to death.

Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...


A Raytheon corporate legend is that one of the engineers discovered the
microwave oven principle when a radar melted a chocolate bar in his shirt
pocket.


That's been an Urban Legend for decades...probably a PR plant from
someone at Raytheon's Santa Barbara, CA, division that deveeloped
the RadaRange (originally a trademark of Raytheon before they sold that
consumer line to Amana).

========

While all the war stories and chit-chat are entertaining, please consider
a real-life tragedy that happened to a TV broadcast van in Los Angeles
last year. The van had stopped and erected its field-to-transmitter link
dish to Mount Wilson where the TV transmitter was. Standard
procedure here to get a clear shot above buildings and obstructions,
all the field vans have such erectable dishes.

Nobody in the field crew seems to have noticed that the van was under
a "high-line" of higher-voltage lines common in local area power
distribution. The dish and its two-section small crane came in contact
with the high-line. Somehow the kind of contact sent a good-sized
electrical power flow down into the van. A woman reporter was severely
burned in addition to being knocked unconscious...burns severe enough
to require amputation of part of an arm and part of a leg. She survived
but spent many months in the hospital and physical therapy, had to use
a wheelchair to get around even though active and healthy and not yet
40 before the accident.

This incident was clearly a result of STUPID NON-ATTENTION by the
TV field crew. That high-line distribution is common all over this city
and adjoining cities. To erect the link dish right into power wiring of
any kind was just compounding the stupidity.

I mention this because amateur radio nearly always involves outside
antennas in urban areas close to utility power wiring on poles. The
possibility of fatal or terrible electric shock isn't confined to some
radio-electronic box interior...it exists out in the open, in plain sight.
Keep it in mind to avoid frying that mind.

Len Anderson
retired (and still living) electronic engineer person

Paul Burridge August 9th 03 10:27 PM

On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 12:11:19 -0700, Mark Fergerson
wrote:

Now that you've explained what you meant, I'll mention
that I must be on at least my fifth parallel Universe.


Don't bother counting. You have a *lot* more to go, it seems.
--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill

Paul Burridge August 9th 03 10:27 PM

On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 12:11:19 -0700, Mark Fergerson
wrote:

Now that you've explained what you meant, I'll mention
that I must be on at least my fifth parallel Universe.


Don't bother counting. You have a *lot* more to go, it seems.
--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill

Roy Lewallen August 9th 03 10:29 PM

Ian White, G3SEK wrote:

. . .


An interesting thing happens when you switch off to isolate part of the
house wiring, and then cut the "dead" three-wire cable. (We call it
"flat twin and earth". It has PVC-insulated hot and neutral wires with a
bare ground wire in between, all in a flattish grey or white PVC sheath.
Is this what you call "Romex"?)


Yes, that's "Romex". The official designation is type NM (for
Non-Metallic). 12 gauge wire, for 20 amps maximum, is "12-2 with ground"
and 14 gauge, for 15 amps, is "14-2 with ground". Those are the most
common sizes for residential lighting and outlet circuits.

If you cut the hot and ground wires
together, nothing happens; but if you cut the neutral and ground wires
together, the RCD trips. That's a puzzle the first time it happens, but
it's because that cable isn't quite as "dead" as you think. the
isolating switches interrupt only the hot wire, so the neutral and earth
are still being shared with everything else that's switched on in the
house.

Does that happen in the USA, or do you have two-pole isolating switches
for individual sub-circuits?


I don't quite follow where you're cutting the wires or where the RCD is
located. Here, you can get a GFCI as either a circuit breaker you
install in the service box to protect a whole circuit, or incorporated
in a duplex outlet. Both are easily identifiable by the conspicuous test
button. The breaker differs from an ordinary breaker in that the neutral
wire is also routed through it.

Circuit breakers interrupt only the "hot" wire. It's been a long time
since I studied the code (NEC - National Electrical Code), but I'm sure
that switching the neutral is still a no-no. Neutral wires are all
brought back to the service box, where they're all connected to the
central power feed wire. The safety grounds are brought back to the
service box separately, where they're connected to the same point as the
neutrals. Neutral and safety ground are connected together only at the
service box, nowhere else.

This isn't totally idle curiosity. If there's an electrical problem
while we're staying with the in-laws in Atlanta, I'm the one who's
supposed to know about these things...


I'd at least get a home-handyman book on electrical wiring, and a real
code book if you'll be doing anything other than pretty simple wiring.
The rules are quite complex, dictating things like how close to a
junction box wires have to be supported, how they can be routed, what
size junction box is required for various combinations of
entering/exiting wires, etc. In Oregon, wiring can legally be done only
by the homeowner or a licensed electrician, but each state and many
localities have their own rules. I think all, or just about all, the
states now at least have agreed to use the NEC. (You're probably
technically forbidden to touch the wiring, depending on Georgia and
Atlanta regulations.) The presence of non-code wiring could result in
non-payment of insurance if a home were to have an electrical fire.

I wired the addition to our home, which involved adding seven circuits
including outside outlets and lights. I also replaced and upgraded the
service box. Those jobs were done with electrical work permits, and both
were inspected and passed. So I have done a bit of this before. But it
was a lot of years ago now, the code evolves, and my memory fades.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Roy Lewallen August 9th 03 10:29 PM

Ian White, G3SEK wrote:

. . .


An interesting thing happens when you switch off to isolate part of the
house wiring, and then cut the "dead" three-wire cable. (We call it
"flat twin and earth". It has PVC-insulated hot and neutral wires with a
bare ground wire in between, all in a flattish grey or white PVC sheath.
Is this what you call "Romex"?)


Yes, that's "Romex". The official designation is type NM (for
Non-Metallic). 12 gauge wire, for 20 amps maximum, is "12-2 with ground"
and 14 gauge, for 15 amps, is "14-2 with ground". Those are the most
common sizes for residential lighting and outlet circuits.

If you cut the hot and ground wires
together, nothing happens; but if you cut the neutral and ground wires
together, the RCD trips. That's a puzzle the first time it happens, but
it's because that cable isn't quite as "dead" as you think. the
isolating switches interrupt only the hot wire, so the neutral and earth
are still being shared with everything else that's switched on in the
house.

Does that happen in the USA, or do you have two-pole isolating switches
for individual sub-circuits?


I don't quite follow where you're cutting the wires or where the RCD is
located. Here, you can get a GFCI as either a circuit breaker you
install in the service box to protect a whole circuit, or incorporated
in a duplex outlet. Both are easily identifiable by the conspicuous test
button. The breaker differs from an ordinary breaker in that the neutral
wire is also routed through it.

Circuit breakers interrupt only the "hot" wire. It's been a long time
since I studied the code (NEC - National Electrical Code), but I'm sure
that switching the neutral is still a no-no. Neutral wires are all
brought back to the service box, where they're all connected to the
central power feed wire. The safety grounds are brought back to the
service box separately, where they're connected to the same point as the
neutrals. Neutral and safety ground are connected together only at the
service box, nowhere else.

This isn't totally idle curiosity. If there's an electrical problem
while we're staying with the in-laws in Atlanta, I'm the one who's
supposed to know about these things...


I'd at least get a home-handyman book on electrical wiring, and a real
code book if you'll be doing anything other than pretty simple wiring.
The rules are quite complex, dictating things like how close to a
junction box wires have to be supported, how they can be routed, what
size junction box is required for various combinations of
entering/exiting wires, etc. In Oregon, wiring can legally be done only
by the homeowner or a licensed electrician, but each state and many
localities have their own rules. I think all, or just about all, the
states now at least have agreed to use the NEC. (You're probably
technically forbidden to touch the wiring, depending on Georgia and
Atlanta regulations.) The presence of non-code wiring could result in
non-payment of insurance if a home were to have an electrical fire.

I wired the addition to our home, which involved adding seven circuits
including outside outlets and lights. I also replaced and upgraded the
service box. Those jobs were done with electrical work permits, and both
were inspected and passed. So I have done a bit of this before. But it
was a lot of years ago now, the code evolves, and my memory fades.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Barry Lennox August 9th 03 11:30 PM

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 10:05:43 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 03:29:47 GMT, Eric Immel
wrote:

Paul, are you asking if anyone has been killed, then revived?


That's pretty close to what I'm getting at. What I *am* actually get
at is that theoretical physicists are coming around to the rather
extraordinary view that one cannot from one's own perspective be
killed by any sudden and dramatic life event. No matter how bad the
shock, you will always 'come around' to find that you've survived. The
tricky bit is that you'll probably have found yourself in a different
reality to the one you left. In the one you've left, observers will
see your cold, dead, smoking body lying sparko on the ground. Your
relatives will grieve, your obituary will be written. But *you* won't
know anything of that. You'll just believe you've had a lucky escape;
you'll go home and tell your friends and family all about it and years
later maybe you'll tell others via the Internet. Sounds nuts?
Incredible as it may seem, the majority of physicists currently


Well that is funky!

Got electrocuted pretty well as a teenager. Fiddling about with an
ex-Army ZC1 set I'd converted to mains, managed to take 230vac from
arm to arm for what seemed like several minutes, but was probably a
second. Was sick, shaking, sore and sweaty for a couple of hours,
still had sore muscles for several days. Not at all funny. But the
universe I came back to seemed pretty normal.

Did the NDE thing after drowning in the school pool as a kid though,
can pretty clearly recall looking down on myself, and the teacher
"bringing me back" I suspect she still wanted to hassle me about the
unfinished homework, and drowning was not going to be accepted as an
excuse! Still the same universe though!

Barry Lennox

Barry Lennox August 9th 03 11:30 PM

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 10:05:43 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 03:29:47 GMT, Eric Immel
wrote:

Paul, are you asking if anyone has been killed, then revived?


That's pretty close to what I'm getting at. What I *am* actually get
at is that theoretical physicists are coming around to the rather
extraordinary view that one cannot from one's own perspective be
killed by any sudden and dramatic life event. No matter how bad the
shock, you will always 'come around' to find that you've survived. The
tricky bit is that you'll probably have found yourself in a different
reality to the one you left. In the one you've left, observers will
see your cold, dead, smoking body lying sparko on the ground. Your
relatives will grieve, your obituary will be written. But *you* won't
know anything of that. You'll just believe you've had a lucky escape;
you'll go home and tell your friends and family all about it and years
later maybe you'll tell others via the Internet. Sounds nuts?
Incredible as it may seem, the majority of physicists currently


Well that is funky!

Got electrocuted pretty well as a teenager. Fiddling about with an
ex-Army ZC1 set I'd converted to mains, managed to take 230vac from
arm to arm for what seemed like several minutes, but was probably a
second. Was sick, shaking, sore and sweaty for a couple of hours,
still had sore muscles for several days. Not at all funny. But the
universe I came back to seemed pretty normal.

Did the NDE thing after drowning in the school pool as a kid though,
can pretty clearly recall looking down on myself, and the teacher
"bringing me back" I suspect she still wanted to hassle me about the
unfinished homework, and drowning was not going to be accepted as an
excuse! Still the same universe though!

Barry Lennox

Avery Fineman August 10th 03 02:01 AM

In article ,
(Bill Bowden) writes:

Watson A.Name - 'Watt Sun' wrote in message
...
In article , richard.p.henry@saic
mentioned...

"Tom Sevart" wrote in message
...

"WB3FUP (Mike Hall)" wrote in message
...
10KV to fire magnetron in counter battery radar. Took six marines to

stop
me from burying my screw driver in the chest of the asshole that

thought
it
would be cute to push the radiate button.

I remember hearing the story of an Air Force tech working on a 30' radar
dish. For some dumb reason, someone energized it and promptly

microwaved
him to death.

Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...

A Raytheon corporate legend is that one of the engineers discovered the
microwave oven principle when a radar melted a chocolate bar in his shirt
pocket.


When I was in the army at Ft. Monmouth, NJ, we trained on a radar
trainer, had a klystron that put out 1W to the horn on the top of the
unit. We could put our finger over the horn and feel it get mildly
warm from the RF.

Big deal. The Real Thing put our 5 megawatts!


Sure, but the pulse width is only a microsecond, so the
average power is only 5 watts at one pulse per second.
I forget the rep rate of the one I woked on but at
6uS per mile and 400 miles round trip, the rep rate
would be about 400 Hz. So it's 400 times 5, or 2KW.

-Bill


A very rough estimate of "radar range" (time out to return of echo)
is 500 feet per microsecond. For a 200 mile search radar the time
out to echo return is 2+ milliseconds, depending on whether it is
calibrated for statute or nautical miles. Typical PRF for those 200
mile search radars was 400 Hz (PRT of about 2.5 mSec).

Average power output is Peak x ((pulse width)/(repetition time)) or
5 MW divided by 2500 = 2 KW.

2 KW concentrated in a 2 to 5 degree cone can have a devastating
heating effect on human tissue.

One may or may not be "in" the cone of the beam right up close
to the feedhorn but, with the construction of most search radars
(maritime or ground) there isn't much walk-around space to get
away from the feedhorn or the very close in-person effects of
microwave radiation.

When working on HIGH POWER RF at any frequency, believe in
the inverse square law and put as much distance from the antenna
as possible...or have a trusted person down on the power controls
who keeps the thing OFF while up there doing whatever.

I think it would be an interesting subject to compare peak power
RF effects versus average power RF effects. I can't seem to find
much on that in hundreds of pages of medical-biological reports
on the effects of RF radiation on human tissue. Unfortunately,
that has been pretty well shunted aside so that someone can get
their pet "alternate universe" speculations going on in here. :-)

All this gee-whizzy speculation stuff leaves me shocked.
But not fatally so...

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person


Avery Fineman August 10th 03 02:01 AM

In article ,
(Bill Bowden) writes:

Watson A.Name - 'Watt Sun' wrote in message
...
In article , richard.p.henry@saic
mentioned...

"Tom Sevart" wrote in message
...

"WB3FUP (Mike Hall)" wrote in message
...
10KV to fire magnetron in counter battery radar. Took six marines to

stop
me from burying my screw driver in the chest of the asshole that

thought
it
would be cute to push the radiate button.

I remember hearing the story of an Air Force tech working on a 30' radar
dish. For some dumb reason, someone energized it and promptly

microwaved
him to death.

Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...

A Raytheon corporate legend is that one of the engineers discovered the
microwave oven principle when a radar melted a chocolate bar in his shirt
pocket.


When I was in the army at Ft. Monmouth, NJ, we trained on a radar
trainer, had a klystron that put out 1W to the horn on the top of the
unit. We could put our finger over the horn and feel it get mildly
warm from the RF.

Big deal. The Real Thing put our 5 megawatts!


Sure, but the pulse width is only a microsecond, so the
average power is only 5 watts at one pulse per second.
I forget the rep rate of the one I woked on but at
6uS per mile and 400 miles round trip, the rep rate
would be about 400 Hz. So it's 400 times 5, or 2KW.

-Bill


A very rough estimate of "radar range" (time out to return of echo)
is 500 feet per microsecond. For a 200 mile search radar the time
out to echo return is 2+ milliseconds, depending on whether it is
calibrated for statute or nautical miles. Typical PRF for those 200
mile search radars was 400 Hz (PRT of about 2.5 mSec).

Average power output is Peak x ((pulse width)/(repetition time)) or
5 MW divided by 2500 = 2 KW.

2 KW concentrated in a 2 to 5 degree cone can have a devastating
heating effect on human tissue.

One may or may not be "in" the cone of the beam right up close
to the feedhorn but, with the construction of most search radars
(maritime or ground) there isn't much walk-around space to get
away from the feedhorn or the very close in-person effects of
microwave radiation.

When working on HIGH POWER RF at any frequency, believe in
the inverse square law and put as much distance from the antenna
as possible...or have a trusted person down on the power controls
who keeps the thing OFF while up there doing whatever.

I think it would be an interesting subject to compare peak power
RF effects versus average power RF effects. I can't seem to find
much on that in hundreds of pages of medical-biological reports
on the effects of RF radiation on human tissue. Unfortunately,
that has been pretty well shunted aside so that someone can get
their pet "alternate universe" speculations going on in here. :-)

All this gee-whizzy speculation stuff leaves me shocked.
But not fatally so...

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person


joe August 10th 03 02:23 AM

Good point for safety, year or so ago, a new ham lost his life
while putting up an antenna on the roof of a friends home,
also a new ham. The antenna contacted house power lines.

73 joe

Avery wrote:

clipped....
I mention this because amateur radio nearly always involves outside
antennas in urban areas close to utility power wiring on poles. The
possibility of fatal or terrible electric shock isn't confined to some
radio-electronic box interior...it exists out in the open, in plain sight.
Keep it in mind to avoid frying that mind.

Len Anderson
retired (and still living) electronic engineer person



joe August 10th 03 02:23 AM

Good point for safety, year or so ago, a new ham lost his life
while putting up an antenna on the roof of a friends home,
also a new ham. The antenna contacted house power lines.

73 joe

Avery wrote:

clipped....
I mention this because amateur radio nearly always involves outside
antennas in urban areas close to utility power wiring on poles. The
possibility of fatal or terrible electric shock isn't confined to some
radio-electronic box interior...it exists out in the open, in plain sight.
Keep it in mind to avoid frying that mind.

Len Anderson
retired (and still living) electronic engineer person



joe August 10th 03 02:33 AM

hi,

A gfci monitors for a current imbalance between the Hot and Neutral
conductors.
A ground connection is not necessary. Per NEC 210-7

http://www.leviton.com/sections/techsupp/faq.htm#2 wire gfi


Regards.




"Gary S." wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:01:16 -0400, Alex wrote:

GFCI?

Ground Fault Circuit Interruptor.

It detects a sudden rise in current to ground and shuts the circuit
off in a fraction of a second.

Fuses protect the circuit, GFCI protects people.

The present US Electrical Code requires them in areas where water is
nearby, including bathrooms, kitchens, garages, and outdoors.

You are encouraged to use them in other places where there is danger
of zapping yourself.

They are not a guarantee, but they boost the odds in your favor.



joe August 10th 03 02:33 AM

hi,

A gfci monitors for a current imbalance between the Hot and Neutral
conductors.
A ground connection is not necessary. Per NEC 210-7

http://www.leviton.com/sections/techsupp/faq.htm#2 wire gfi


Regards.




"Gary S." wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:01:16 -0400, Alex wrote:

GFCI?

Ground Fault Circuit Interruptor.

It detects a sudden rise in current to ground and shuts the circuit
off in a fraction of a second.

Fuses protect the circuit, GFCI protects people.

The present US Electrical Code requires them in areas where water is
nearby, including bathrooms, kitchens, garages, and outdoors.

You are encouraged to use them in other places where there is danger
of zapping yourself.

They are not a guarantee, but they boost the odds in your favor.



Avery Fineman August 10th 03 04:22 AM

In article , Paul Burridge
writes:

On 09 Aug 2003 19:46:02 GMT, (Avery Fineman)
wrote:

If the source has over 30 Volts and can supply over 30 milliamperes
through the cardiac region, you will go into cardiac fibrilation.


Sorry, Len, but I can't see it. I routinely check for HV on the anodes
of certain smallish valves with bare fingers and can't even begin to
feel anything under about 80 volts (at very much more current
capability than 30mA) at the low end. However, I read somewhere that
some guy died from just a 12V 'shock' - must have been a world
record.. :-(


I'm not concerned with what YOU do personally, nor will I set any
"standards" for all humans based on what one human can or can't
do or feel.

I got the "30-30" phrase while working at Birtcher Instruments, a
semiconductor test instrument maker and a division of Birtcher
Medical that made several different medical electronic instruments
(EKG, RF knife/cautery, defibrilators,etc.). Someone at Birtcher
Medical told me about it. I was Chief Engineer at Birtcher Instruments
in Monterey Park, California, a suburb of Los Angeles (not the upstate
Monterey, CA, where some FedEx deliveries went, hi). I don't think
that my employer at the time would give me false information.

The City of Los Angeles building and safety codes don't require
inspection of 24 VAC wiring in residences and that sort of wiring is
common here for furnace and HVAC controls, doorbells, etc. That
AC voltage is never considered "high voltage." That is probably true
of the USA National Electrical Code although I haven't read one
recently (I've only read the coding in the Numeric Electromagnetic
Code recently, quite different from the other "NEC").

I really don't know the medical-biological low threashold for direct
cardiac stimulation through an opening in the chest cavity. I don't
care to know. I care to know NOT to futz around with my or anyone
else's body with anything above the "30-30" limits.

If YOU want to experiment with your own body, feel free. Then you
transport yourself to that other "reality." When you get there, ask
someone there to shock themselves into this reality and tell us all what
it is like "over there." I live in THIS reality where survival depends on
not treating electricity cavalierly like it was words in a newsgroup.

Happy zapping.

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person

Avery Fineman August 10th 03 04:22 AM

In article , Paul Burridge
writes:

On 09 Aug 2003 19:46:02 GMT, (Avery Fineman)
wrote:

If the source has over 30 Volts and can supply over 30 milliamperes
through the cardiac region, you will go into cardiac fibrilation.


Sorry, Len, but I can't see it. I routinely check for HV on the anodes
of certain smallish valves with bare fingers and can't even begin to
feel anything under about 80 volts (at very much more current
capability than 30mA) at the low end. However, I read somewhere that
some guy died from just a 12V 'shock' - must have been a world
record.. :-(


I'm not concerned with what YOU do personally, nor will I set any
"standards" for all humans based on what one human can or can't
do or feel.

I got the "30-30" phrase while working at Birtcher Instruments, a
semiconductor test instrument maker and a division of Birtcher
Medical that made several different medical electronic instruments
(EKG, RF knife/cautery, defibrilators,etc.). Someone at Birtcher
Medical told me about it. I was Chief Engineer at Birtcher Instruments
in Monterey Park, California, a suburb of Los Angeles (not the upstate
Monterey, CA, where some FedEx deliveries went, hi). I don't think
that my employer at the time would give me false information.

The City of Los Angeles building and safety codes don't require
inspection of 24 VAC wiring in residences and that sort of wiring is
common here for furnace and HVAC controls, doorbells, etc. That
AC voltage is never considered "high voltage." That is probably true
of the USA National Electrical Code although I haven't read one
recently (I've only read the coding in the Numeric Electromagnetic
Code recently, quite different from the other "NEC").

I really don't know the medical-biological low threashold for direct
cardiac stimulation through an opening in the chest cavity. I don't
care to know. I care to know NOT to futz around with my or anyone
else's body with anything above the "30-30" limits.

If YOU want to experiment with your own body, feel free. Then you
transport yourself to that other "reality." When you get there, ask
someone there to shock themselves into this reality and tell us all what
it is like "over there." I live in THIS reality where survival depends on
not treating electricity cavalierly like it was words in a newsgroup.

Happy zapping.

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person

Roy Lewallen August 10th 03 04:31 AM

I had a NDE when I congratulated a young lady on her pregnancy, and it
turned out she wasn't pregnant. Near-fatal shock, it was, too.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Roy Lewallen August 10th 03 04:31 AM

I had a NDE when I congratulated a young lady on her pregnancy, and it
turned out she wasn't pregnant. Near-fatal shock, it was, too.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Rob Judd August 10th 03 12:41 PM

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 21:36:08 GMT, Gary S. Idontwantspam@net wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:01:16 -0400, Alex wrote:

GFCI?

Ground Fault Circuit Interruptor.


How splendid! We call them Residual Current Circuit Breakers in
England. Typically they trip out at just over the amount of current
required to kill someone. Keeps the bills down that way. In *this*
universe, anyway.


They're Earth Leakage Detectors in Australia. ;-)

Rob

Rob Judd August 10th 03 12:41 PM

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 21:36:08 GMT, Gary S. Idontwantspam@net wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:01:16 -0400, Alex wrote:

GFCI?

Ground Fault Circuit Interruptor.


How splendid! We call them Residual Current Circuit Breakers in
England. Typically they trip out at just over the amount of current
required to kill someone. Keeps the bills down that way. In *this*
universe, anyway.


They're Earth Leakage Detectors in Australia. ;-)

Rob

Rob Judd August 10th 03 12:42 PM

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:52:03 GMT, Spehro Pefhany
wrote:

Does that mean that my smoking/exploding MOSFETs have narrowly
survived their "both sides of the half-bridge on" event in some
parallel universe? How about my dog who got runned over (sic) when I
was 12? Is he happily chasing various critters somewhere?


The world's brightest minds would have it so, strange as it seems. For
a gentle introduction into the subject, check out 'The Universe Next
Door' by Marcus Chown.


Naah. Never was into Science Fantasy ...

Rob

Rob Judd August 10th 03 12:42 PM

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:52:03 GMT, Spehro Pefhany
wrote:

Does that mean that my smoking/exploding MOSFETs have narrowly
survived their "both sides of the half-bridge on" event in some
parallel universe? How about my dog who got runned over (sic) when I
was 12? Is he happily chasing various critters somewhere?


The world's brightest minds would have it so, strange as it seems. For
a gentle introduction into the subject, check out 'The Universe Next
Door' by Marcus Chown.


Naah. Never was into Science Fantasy ...

Rob

Paul Burridge August 10th 03 01:06 PM

On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:30:03 +1200, Barry Lennox
wrote:

Still the same universe though!


How would you know?
--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill

Paul Burridge August 10th 03 01:06 PM

On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:30:03 +1200, Barry Lennox
wrote:

Still the same universe though!


How would you know?
--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill

Paul Burridge August 10th 03 01:06 PM

On 10 Aug 2003 03:22:06 GMT, (Avery Fineman)
wrote:

I really don't know the medical-biological low threashold for direct
cardiac stimulation through an opening in the chest cavity. I don't
care to know. I care to know NOT to futz around with my or anyone
else's body with anything above the "30-30" limits.


As a general safety rule I'm sure you're right. However it does
overlook the fact that different individuals have different tolerance
levels, hence the fatality at 12V (the only recorded one, I believe)
and that Polish electrician who checks for the presence of 230VAC by
sticking his fingers in light sockets where he perceives a "slight
tingle." I personally can't feel 60V dc *at all* and would be
interested to know of others experiences of the lowest voltage they
can feel - without suggesting anyone do so, of course. Based on past
experience, I suppose.

--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill

Paul Burridge August 10th 03 01:06 PM

On 10 Aug 2003 03:22:06 GMT, (Avery Fineman)
wrote:

I really don't know the medical-biological low threashold for direct
cardiac stimulation through an opening in the chest cavity. I don't
care to know. I care to know NOT to futz around with my or anyone
else's body with anything above the "30-30" limits.


As a general safety rule I'm sure you're right. However it does
overlook the fact that different individuals have different tolerance
levels, hence the fatality at 12V (the only recorded one, I believe)
and that Polish electrician who checks for the presence of 230VAC by
sticking his fingers in light sockets where he perceives a "slight
tingle." I personally can't feel 60V dc *at all* and would be
interested to know of others experiences of the lowest voltage they
can feel - without suggesting anyone do so, of course. Based on past
experience, I suppose.

--

"I believe history will be kind to me, since I intend
to write it." - Winston Churchill

Blake August 10th 03 01:30 PM

Dave Platt wrote:


Seems to go along well with "keep one hand in your back pocket" and
"don't work on this stuff while standing in a puddle of water".


When I am around high voltages, I practice the "two-hand rule" - I keep both
hands in my pockets and don't touch anything.

Blake

--
Drop 'pants' to reply by email

Blake August 10th 03 01:30 PM

Dave Platt wrote:


Seems to go along well with "keep one hand in your back pocket" and
"don't work on this stuff while standing in a puddle of water".


When I am around high voltages, I practice the "two-hand rule" - I keep both
hands in my pockets and don't touch anything.

Blake

--
Drop 'pants' to reply by email

Keyboard In The Wilderness August 10th 03 05:08 PM

Had big time Electric Shocks -- never fatal obviously
Had big time shocks that should (could) have been fatal -- ART- 13 Dynamotor
Navy. 440 AC - steel mill, etc.
But tis the current that does you in, not the voltage.

Coupla hundred milliAmperes will do it --- URL:
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/JackHsu.shtml

Guess my Irish hide has lots of ohms!

Steel Mill Stories from the 40's (Maybe Urban Legend)

1. A lunch eater sat down and rested his head on a huge copper bus bar
(voltage unknown), someone turned on the switch, he was reduced to a
frazzled lump with a half a sandwich!

2. A careless electrician up high on an overhead crane, got across a high
voltage line and fell into one of those giant ladles that pour out the
molten steel. Not found.

Maybe the old steel mill hands -- told this to the new guys to scare the
hell out of em, Worked for me!

Lock the distribution box, take off all jewelry, keep one mitt behind you,
keep away from the chassis, -- all good advice, mostly learned the hard way.

Then there was a color TV High Voltage supply ---- oocchhh !!! A teeth
rattling experience.



Keyboard In The Wilderness August 10th 03 05:08 PM

Had big time Electric Shocks -- never fatal obviously
Had big time shocks that should (could) have been fatal -- ART- 13 Dynamotor
Navy. 440 AC - steel mill, etc.
But tis the current that does you in, not the voltage.

Coupla hundred milliAmperes will do it --- URL:
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/JackHsu.shtml

Guess my Irish hide has lots of ohms!

Steel Mill Stories from the 40's (Maybe Urban Legend)

1. A lunch eater sat down and rested his head on a huge copper bus bar
(voltage unknown), someone turned on the switch, he was reduced to a
frazzled lump with a half a sandwich!

2. A careless electrician up high on an overhead crane, got across a high
voltage line and fell into one of those giant ladles that pour out the
molten steel. Not found.

Maybe the old steel mill hands -- told this to the new guys to scare the
hell out of em, Worked for me!

Lock the distribution box, take off all jewelry, keep one mitt behind you,
keep away from the chassis, -- all good advice, mostly learned the hard way.

Then there was a color TV High Voltage supply ---- oocchhh !!! A teeth
rattling experience.



Gary S. August 10th 03 05:16 PM

On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:06:23 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote:

On 10 Aug 2003 03:22:06 GMT, (Avery Fineman)
wrote:

I really don't know the medical-biological low threashold for direct
cardiac stimulation through an opening in the chest cavity. I don't
care to know. I care to know NOT to futz around with my or anyone
else's body with anything above the "30-30" limits.


As a general safety rule I'm sure you're right. However it does
overlook the fact that different individuals have different tolerance
levels, hence the fatality at 12V (the only recorded one, I believe)
and that Polish electrician who checks for the presence of 230VAC by


It also matters what the surface resistance of your skin is, and how
good a "connection" to the nervous system and heart.

For example, You could put dry fingers on a 9V battery and not feel a
thing, but if you lick your fingers first, get a real tingle. Same
voltage, but the moisture allows current to flow.

In medicine, the defibrillator paddles are covered with a conductive
gel, and use a precise pulse of voltage and current. In open heart
procedures, lower voltage and current is used, with paddles applied
directly to the heart.

Of course, disrupting the heart rhythm may happen with lower voltage,
especially AC or RF.

Why is being careful such a problem for some?

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

Gary S. August 10th 03 05:16 PM

On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:06:23 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote:

On 10 Aug 2003 03:22:06 GMT, (Avery Fineman)
wrote:

I really don't know the medical-biological low threashold for direct
cardiac stimulation through an opening in the chest cavity. I don't
care to know. I care to know NOT to futz around with my or anyone
else's body with anything above the "30-30" limits.


As a general safety rule I'm sure you're right. However it does
overlook the fact that different individuals have different tolerance
levels, hence the fatality at 12V (the only recorded one, I believe)
and that Polish electrician who checks for the presence of 230VAC by


It also matters what the surface resistance of your skin is, and how
good a "connection" to the nervous system and heart.

For example, You could put dry fingers on a 9V battery and not feel a
thing, but if you lick your fingers first, get a real tingle. Same
voltage, but the moisture allows current to flow.

In medicine, the defibrillator paddles are covered with a conductive
gel, and use a precise pulse of voltage and current. In open heart
procedures, lower voltage and current is used, with paddles applied
directly to the heart.

Of course, disrupting the heart rhythm may happen with lower voltage,
especially AC or RF.

Why is being careful such a problem for some?

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

Gary S. August 10th 03 06:26 PM

On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 09:28:41 -0400, tk wrote:

Years ago (50's) I was sitting on a 240 volt 600 amp circuit breaker
inside the Power Distribution Frame of an IBM 704 installed at the Air
Force Computing Center in the Pentagon. A civil service operator came in
early and hit the power on button...... I survived and so did the
operator....
murder is murder.... whatever the reason.

The full version of OSHA-approved (the US Occupation Safety and Health
Administration of the Department of Labor) safety lock-out/tag-out
procedure includes safety procedures such as locking out the
electrical power to a piece of equipment while it is being worked on.

There is one device applied to the breaker box that locks it off, and
then each worker places their own personal padlock to keep that device
locked, as well as a supervisor and possibly a safety engineer. The
equipment cannot be turned on until every single person is finished
and has cleared the area.

Seems obsessive, but it doesn't produce stories like on this thread.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

Gary S. August 10th 03 06:26 PM

On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 09:28:41 -0400, tk wrote:

Years ago (50's) I was sitting on a 240 volt 600 amp circuit breaker
inside the Power Distribution Frame of an IBM 704 installed at the Air
Force Computing Center in the Pentagon. A civil service operator came in
early and hit the power on button...... I survived and so did the
operator....
murder is murder.... whatever the reason.

The full version of OSHA-approved (the US Occupation Safety and Health
Administration of the Department of Labor) safety lock-out/tag-out
procedure includes safety procedures such as locking out the
electrical power to a piece of equipment while it is being worked on.

There is one device applied to the breaker box that locks it off, and
then each worker places their own personal padlock to keep that device
locked, as well as a supervisor and possibly a safety engineer. The
equipment cannot be turned on until every single person is finished
and has cleared the area.

Seems obsessive, but it doesn't produce stories like on this thread.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

John Michael Williams August 10th 03 07:04 PM

(Avery Fineman) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Bill Bowden) writes:

Watson A.Name - 'Watt Sun' wrote in message
...
In article , richard.p.henry@saic
mentioned...

"Tom Sevart" wrote in message
...

"WB3FUP (Mike Hall)" wrote in message
...
10KV to fire magnetron in counter battery radar. Took six marines to

stop
me from burying my screw driver in the chest of the asshole that

thought
it
would be cute to push the radiate button.

I remember hearing the story of an Air Force tech working on a 30' radar
dish. For some dumb reason, someone energized it and promptly

microwaved
him to death.

Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...

A Raytheon corporate legend is that one of the engineers discovered the
microwave oven principle when a radar melted a chocolate bar in his shirt
pocket.

When I was in the army at Ft. Monmouth, NJ, we trained on a radar
trainer, had a klystron that put out 1W to the horn on the top of the
unit. We could put our finger over the horn and feel it get mildly
warm from the RF.

Big deal. The Real Thing put our 5 megawatts!


Sure, but the pulse width is only a microsecond, so the
average power is only 5 watts at one pulse per second.
I forget the rep rate of the one I woked on but at
6uS per mile and 400 miles round trip, the rep rate
would be about 400 Hz. So it's 400 times 5, or 2KW.

-Bill


A very rough estimate of "radar range" (time out to return of echo)
is 500 feet per microsecond. For a 200 mile search radar the time
out to echo return is 2+ milliseconds, depending on whether it is
calibrated for statute or nautical miles. Typical PRF for those 200
mile search radars was 400 Hz (PRT of about 2.5 mSec).

Average power output is Peak x ((pulse width)/(repetition time)) or
5 MW divided by 2500 = 2 KW.

2 KW concentrated in a 2 to 5 degree cone can have a devastating
heating effect on human tissue.

One may or may not be "in" the cone of the beam right up close
to the feedhorn but, with the construction of most search radars
(maritime or ground) there isn't much walk-around space to get
away from the feedhorn or the very close in-person effects of
microwave radiation.

When working on HIGH POWER RF at any frequency, believe in
the inverse square law and put as much distance from the antenna
as possible...or have a trusted person down on the power controls
who keeps the thing OFF while up there doing whatever.

I think it would be an interesting subject to compare peak power
RF effects versus average power RF effects. I can't seem to find
much on that in hundreds of pages of medical-biological reports
on the effects of RF radiation on human tissue. Unfortunately,
that has been pretty well shunted aside so that someone can get
their pet "alternate universe" speculations going on in here. :-)

All this gee-whizzy speculation stuff leaves me shocked.
But not fatally so...

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person



There are a few refs and calculations in
http://arXiv.org/pdf/physics/0102007

Lu, et al (referenced) found that peak power was
responsible for spark-gap transmitter injury in rats.

Microwave hearing (referenced somewhat; see a review
Supplement to Radio Science in 1977) also seems to be
because of peak, not average, power.

John

John Michael Williams

John Michael Williams August 10th 03 07:04 PM

(Avery Fineman) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Bill Bowden) writes:

Watson A.Name - 'Watt Sun' wrote in message
...
In article , richard.p.henry@saic
mentioned...

"Tom Sevart" wrote in message
...

"WB3FUP (Mike Hall)" wrote in message
...
10KV to fire magnetron in counter battery radar. Took six marines to

stop
me from burying my screw driver in the chest of the asshole that

thought
it
would be cute to push the radiate button.

I remember hearing the story of an Air Force tech working on a 30' radar
dish. For some dumb reason, someone energized it and promptly

microwaved
him to death.

Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...

A Raytheon corporate legend is that one of the engineers discovered the
microwave oven principle when a radar melted a chocolate bar in his shirt
pocket.

When I was in the army at Ft. Monmouth, NJ, we trained on a radar
trainer, had a klystron that put out 1W to the horn on the top of the
unit. We could put our finger over the horn and feel it get mildly
warm from the RF.

Big deal. The Real Thing put our 5 megawatts!


Sure, but the pulse width is only a microsecond, so the
average power is only 5 watts at one pulse per second.
I forget the rep rate of the one I woked on but at
6uS per mile and 400 miles round trip, the rep rate
would be about 400 Hz. So it's 400 times 5, or 2KW.

-Bill


A very rough estimate of "radar range" (time out to return of echo)
is 500 feet per microsecond. For a 200 mile search radar the time
out to echo return is 2+ milliseconds, depending on whether it is
calibrated for statute or nautical miles. Typical PRF for those 200
mile search radars was 400 Hz (PRT of about 2.5 mSec).

Average power output is Peak x ((pulse width)/(repetition time)) or
5 MW divided by 2500 = 2 KW.

2 KW concentrated in a 2 to 5 degree cone can have a devastating
heating effect on human tissue.

One may or may not be "in" the cone of the beam right up close
to the feedhorn but, with the construction of most search radars
(maritime or ground) there isn't much walk-around space to get
away from the feedhorn or the very close in-person effects of
microwave radiation.

When working on HIGH POWER RF at any frequency, believe in
the inverse square law and put as much distance from the antenna
as possible...or have a trusted person down on the power controls
who keeps the thing OFF while up there doing whatever.

I think it would be an interesting subject to compare peak power
RF effects versus average power RF effects. I can't seem to find
much on that in hundreds of pages of medical-biological reports
on the effects of RF radiation on human tissue. Unfortunately,
that has been pretty well shunted aside so that someone can get
their pet "alternate universe" speculations going on in here. :-)

All this gee-whizzy speculation stuff leaves me shocked.
But not fatally so...

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person



There are a few refs and calculations in
http://arXiv.org/pdf/physics/0102007

Lu, et al (referenced) found that peak power was
responsible for spark-gap transmitter injury in rats.

Microwave hearing (referenced somewhat; see a review
Supplement to Radio Science in 1977) also seems to be
because of peak, not average, power.

John

John Michael Williams

scharkalvin August 10th 03 07:25 PM


Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...


That's how we tested batteries when I was a kid. 'Course there was the
dufus that tried it with a 90v B battery!




scharkalvin August 10th 03 07:25 PM


Some of these stories are hair rasing... and I'm too much of a weenie to
stick my tongue on a 9V battery...


That's how we tested batteries when I was a kid. 'Course there was the
dufus that tried it with a 90v B battery!




Howard Henry Schlunder August 10th 03 07:26 PM

"K Wind" wrote in message
.. .
Would 1,500VDC with 6mA capability flowing through one arm and out the

other
be considered lethal? At one time, I knew how much current was considered
lethal, but have forgotten.


No. It is actually quite hard to kill yourself with electrical shocks.
There are tons easier and more likely things to die from in everyday life.

60Hz AC is most dangerous in the range of 100 to 300 mA. Current in that
range sometimes causes ventricular fibrillation, whereas currents above that
usually cause the heart to temporarily contract and protect itself. Very
high currents, however, can dissipate lots of power in your organs and cook
them, leading to a painful death if nothing stops the electrocution for
several minutes. High frequency AC (like many kilohertz and beyond) should
be less dangerous since it will be bound by "skin effect" and not penetrate
as far into your chest cavity. DC is considerably safer than 60Hz AC, and
I've read some estimates saying you need 4 times as much current to die from
DC shocks. I don't know if I believe that though; I suspect there are too
few cases to draw significant statistical conclusions. As I understand it
(and I may be wrong here), DC is safer than AC because it doesn't cause
ventricular fibrillation, so death by these shocks occur from organ damage
and falling off ladders and things.

Howard Henry Schlunder




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com