Subject: want circuit/schematic for CB "jammer"
From: donut

(Limitedselection) wrote in
:

Thanks - Mike posted about sky waves (I was unaware of), so even a
very low power device centrally located in my property would
apparently be heard world-wide - which is NOT what I want.

I hardly think this would be a problem. For one, you'd need an antenna
radiating a large proportion of skywave. Second, the CB bands are loaded
with all kinds of open carriers, whistlers, music players, etc. so your
tiny part in this would be unlikely to harm anyone.


Donut,
Thanks for the info. Earlier someone suggested using a mobile CB with a car
battery and a magnet antenna and a garbage bag - and placing this as close to
the neighbor antenna as possible.
I think building a low-power jammer and placing it close to his antenna would
be a better solution. Less expensive and totally disposable.
You are one of the few people on Earth (well, at least on usenet - on usenet so
far since I posted yesterday) that seems to think that this would be relatively
harmless. Other people are equating asking for a jammer schematic to asking
for information on manufacturing chemical/biological/nuclear weapons (it
probably sounds like I am kidding about this - but I am NOT).
Thank you for your rational/calm approach to this!


Anything you might do to jam this CBer (like an oscillator to transmit an
OC) would also jam the walkie talkies.

1. Change the channel the walkie talkies operate on, or

2. Replace them with walkie talkies using another band. I believe there are
walkies talkies that also operate around 49 MHz.

At this point I am still looking for LOW POWER jammer schematics. Although
someone told me that some are on the way.
Thank you for your information though, I appreciate it.

Have you concidered the DS1086 Spread Spectrum Econoscillator from
dallas Semiconductors.
A programmable Oscillator ( between 260Khz and 130Mhz ) with a
selectable 'dither' of either 2% or 4% ) powered from a few AA cells
would last a very long time and would sit nicely in the grass by the
CBers Aerial and clutter up his comms very effectivly ;-)

Very Tongue in cheek... Mike W
--

On 06 Sep 2003 07:31:53 GMT,
(Limitedselection) wrote:

Subject: want circuit/schematic for CB "jammer"
From: donut

(Limitedselection) wrote in
:

Thanks - Mike posted about sky waves (I was unaware of), so even a
very low power device centrally located in my property would
apparently be heard world-wide - which is NOT what I want.

I hardly think this would be a problem. For one, you'd need an antenna
radiating a large proportion of skywave. Second, the CB bands are loaded
with all kinds of open carriers, whistlers, music players, etc. so your
tiny part in this would be unlikely to harm anyone.


Donut,
Thanks for the info. Earlier someone suggested using a mobile CB with a car
battery and a magnet antenna and a garbage bag - and placing this as close to
the neighbor antenna as possible.
I think building a low-power jammer and placing it close to his antenna would
be a better solution. Less expensive and totally disposable.
You are one of the few people on Earth (well, at least on usenet - on usenet so
far since I posted yesterday) that seems to think that this would be relatively
harmless. Other people are equating asking for a jammer schematic to asking
for information on manufacturing chemical/biological/nuclear weapons (it
probably sounds like I am kidding about this - but I am NOT).
Thank you for your rational/calm approach to this!


Anything you might do to jam this CBer (like an oscillator to transmit an
OC) would also jam the walkie talkies.

1. Change the channel the walkie talkies operate on, or

2. Replace them with walkie talkies using another band. I believe there are
walkies talkies that also operate around 49 MHz.

At this point I am still looking for LOW POWER jammer schematics. Although
someone told me that some are on the way.
Thank you for your information though, I appreciate it.

Have you concidered the DS1086 Spread Spectrum Econoscillator from
dallas Semiconductors.
A programmable Oscillator ( between 260Khz and 130Mhz ) with a
selectable 'dither' of either 2% or 4% ) powered from a few AA cells
would last a very long time and would sit nicely in the grass by the
CBers Aerial and clutter up his comms very effectivly ;-)

Very Tongue in cheek... Mike W
--

On 06 Sep 2003 07:31:53 GMT,
(Limitedselection) wrote:

Subject: want circuit/schematic for CB "jammer"
From: donut

(Limitedselection) wrote in
:

Thanks - Mike posted about sky waves (I was unaware of), so even a
very low power device centrally located in my property would
apparently be heard world-wide - which is NOT what I want.

I hardly think this would be a problem. For one, you'd need an antenna
radiating a large proportion of skywave. Second, the CB bands are loaded
with all kinds of open carriers, whistlers, music players, etc. so your
tiny part in this would be unlikely to harm anyone.


Donut,
Thanks for the info. Earlier someone suggested using a mobile CB with a car
battery and a magnet antenna and a garbage bag - and placing this as close to
the neighbor antenna as possible.
I think building a low-power jammer and placing it close to his antenna would
be a better solution. Less expensive and totally disposable.
You are one of the few people on Earth (well, at least on usenet - on usenet so
far since I posted yesterday) that seems to think that this would be relatively
harmless. Other people are equating asking for a jammer schematic to asking
for information on manufacturing chemical/biological/nuclear weapons (it
probably sounds like I am kidding about this - but I am NOT).
Thank you for your rational/calm approach to this!


Anything you might do to jam this CBer (like an oscillator to transmit an
OC) would also jam the walkie talkies.

1. Change the channel the walkie talkies operate on, or

2. Replace them with walkie talkies using another band. I believe there are
walkies talkies that also operate around 49 MHz.

At this point I am still looking for LOW POWER jammer schematics. Although
someone told me that some are on the way.
Thank you for your information though, I appreciate it.