Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you need the accuracy of the frequency standard? Why not just buy a
little 4MHz CMOS crystal oscillator? If jitter and accuracy were important I'd either (hobby use) build a VXCO with an 8MHz crystal referenced to 2MHz from the standard or (for a customer design) buy an integrated 4MHz VXCO and reference it to 2MHz from the standard. In either case I'd use the phase comparator from a 74HC4046 or an exclusive OR gate. You'll be using a divide-by 5 which can be had from a 74HC390 if they're still available, and a divide-by 2 or 4, which can be had from just about anything -- including the same 74HC390 if your hookup is a little perverse. All the logic _could_ be done on a PAL, of course. Come to think of it if absolute accuracy is important but jitter isn't you can just use the oscillator from the '4046 as well, with the same division scheme. -------------------------------------- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com "Mike W" wrote in message ... I have a need to produce an accurate 4Mhz 50% dutycycle TTL squarewave to use as a timebase. I have a 10Mhz IQD frequency standard of suitable accuracy. How can I divide this to produce the 50% duty cycle 4Mhz signal?. Is it even possible with logic alone?. I can see how to mix with either 6Mhz or 14Mhz, but this then detracts from the required accuracy. atb Mikw |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Single Sideband FM | Homebrew |