LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old August 11th 04, 07:30 PM
Steve Nosko
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joe,

Interesting. A splitter as directional coupler for the reverse
direction.... Hmmm Yea... and since the device 'probably' won't be near 75
ohms, that directivity won't be a big issue. What about the phase response
bandwidth? That's important too. Unfortunately the phase response starts
changing well into the passband, right?...
--
Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.


"Joe Rocci" wrote in message
news:T0eSc.4297$Kv2.4186@trndny09...
Steve,
A decent (not the dollar store variety) CATV splitter has directivity of
about 30 dB from 5Mhz to over 500 MHZ. I think this would do the job.

Joe
W3JDR


Steve Nosko wrote in message
...

"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:53:44 GMT, "Joe Rocci" wrote:

Here's an idea that's just whacky enough that it might work...has

anyone
tried it?

If you have a dual-trace scope with enough bandwidth, you might be

able
use
Lissajous patterns. The idea would be to drive the complex load

through
a
directional coupler with fairly good directivity. A sample of the

incident
signal would go into the scope X input and a sample of the reflected

signal
would go into the Y input. With a pure reactance as a calibration

load,
adjust the X and Y scope gain for a perfect circle on the display.

Replace
the test load with a complex load, and the magnitude and inclination

of
the
line/oval display can tell you amplitude and phase of the reflected

signal,
from which any other metric can be calculated.

Nice idea, Joe! If it could only be made to work, you'd be a genius.
--



OK Actually, this looks good as long as you have a directional coupler

for
the frequency of interest! Paul didn't say. (SWR Bridge, actual

bridge,
for lower frequencies) You'll also have to allow for the difference in
location of the two samples by adjusting the line lengths to the two

scope
probes intil they are both at the same "distance" from the load.

Judging
phase shift from a circle can't be as good as simply looking at the two
waveforms. The scope horiz gain can be adjusted for some nice number of
divisions for each half cycle, say 9...
I've got a 100MHz. dual trace storage scope, but any directional
couplers around here only will be down to 130 Mhz at best... I do also

have
a good bridge for down to 5 MHz., (also about 1 meter worth of stretch
line...so it is possible as long as the power level is within the bridge
capability.
--
Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.








 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Measuring Zin David Homebrew 0 May 21st 04 03:35 PM
Measuring radiation resistance Paul Burridge Homebrew 0 December 8th 03 12:55 AM
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 Jason Dugas Equipment 36 November 6th 03 08:18 PM
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 Jason Dugas Homebrew 44 November 6th 03 08:18 PM
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 Jason Dugas Homebrew 0 October 30th 03 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017