"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
news
From Google on k2aop: www2.arrl.org/qst/feedback/2004/10/Feedback1004.pdf

Feedback A couple of errors crept into the K2AOP oscillator schematic in
Technical Correspondence [Figure 1, "A Simple, Well-Behaved Crystal
Oscillator," Sep 2004, p 67]. R1, shown as 22 M?, should be 2.2 M?. R5,
shown as 100 ?, should be 1000 ?. The variable trimmer capacitor (shown as
C4) should be C3 (18 pF). C4 should be a fixed capacitor.


That draftsman has to know where every skeleton is buried within 100 miles
of Newington to hold down that job.

W4ZCB

In article L_cUc.26503$TI1.6110@attbi_s52, says...

"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
news
From Google on k2aop: www2.arrl.org/qst/feedback/2004/10/Feedback1004.pdf

Feedback A couple of errors crept into the K2AOP oscillator schematic in
Technical Correspondence [Figure 1, "A Simple, Well-Behaved Crystal
Oscillator," Sep 2004, p 67]. R1, shown as 22 M?, should be 2.2 M?. R5,
shown as 100 ?, should be 1000 ?. The variable trimmer capacitor (shown as
C4) should be C3 (18 pF). C4 should be a fixed capacitor.


That draftsman has to know where every skeleton is buried within 100 miles
of Newington to hold down that job.

Jeez, you're not kidding. That's outrageous. They may have just drawn
what the author submitted, though, so I'm not sure if it's the
draftsman's fault.

-- jm

------------------------------------------------------
http://www.qsl.net/ke5fx
Note: My E-mail address has been altered to avoid spam
------------------------------------------------------

That draftsman has to know where every skeleton is buried within 100
miles
of Newington to hold down that job.

Jeez, you're not kidding. That's outrageous. They may have just drawn
what the author submitted, though, so I'm not sure if it's the
draftsman's fault.

-- jm

Previous experience says it's the draftsperson. Or the rules he/she has to
follow.

W4ZCB

"Harold E. Johnson" wrote in message
news:L_cUc.26503$TI1.6110@attbi_s52...

"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
news
From Google on k2aop:
www2.arrl.org/qst/feedback/2004/10/Feedback1004.pdf

Feedback A couple of errors crept into the K2AOP oscillator schematic in
Technical Correspondence [Figure 1, "A Simple, Well-Behaved Crystal
Oscillator," Sep 2004, p 67]. R1, shown as 22 M?, should be 2.2 M?. R5,
shown as 100 ?, should be 1000 ?. The variable trimmer capacitor (shown
as
C4) should be C3 (18 pF). C4 should be a fixed capacitor.


That draftsman has to know where every skeleton is buried within 100 miles
of Newington to hold down that job.

W4ZCB

The errors in the schematics AND the articles, including content errors is
rather disturbing. Technical accuracy is hard for the editors to insure, if
they look at all. Hey! We're amateurs after all...
--
Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.

Anyone remember the QStreeT and/or Handbook DDS explanation and working
model mess from the late nineties?
73, Dave, N3HE

"Harold E. Johnson" wrote in message
news:L_cUc.26503$TI1.6110@attbi_s52...

"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
news
From Google on k2aop:
www2.arrl.org/qst/feedback/2004/10/Feedback1004.pdf

Feedback A couple of errors crept into the K2AOP oscillator schematic in
Technical Correspondence [Figure 1, "A Simple, Well-Behaved Crystal
Oscillator," Sep 2004, p 67]. R1, shown as 22 M?, should be 2.2 M?. R5,
shown as 100 ?, should be 1000 ?. The variable trimmer capacitor (shown
as
C4) should be C3 (18 pF). C4 should be a fixed capacitor.


That draftsman has to know where every skeleton is buried within 100 miles
of Newington to hold down that job.

W4ZCB