Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Here to there" wrote in message
. .. We have a mix of Linux, Windows, Solaris, etc machines at my home and office. When it comes to outstanding convenience and price ( free! ) nothing beats VNC. Given your criteria, I'd have to agree with you. HOWEVER... I've used VNC plenty, and there are numerous minor 'quirks' where parts of the screen don't get updated correctly. For connecting Windows machines to other Windows machines, the Microsoft 'Remote Desktop' facility is, in my experience, more reliable and robust (it lets you control far more of what gets 'stripped away' from the controlled machine, besides just the desktop wallpaper that VNC will). (The server side is included with Windows XP for the price of the OS, and the client is free for all platforms, including UNIX machines.) VNC does have some nice goodies that remote desktop doesn't -- the built-in 'web server' feature is really great. I've run some Windows machines with both VNC and remote desktop enabled. ---Joel Kolstad |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL CD ROMS under linux. | Homebrew | |||
ARRL CD ROMS under linux. | Homebrew | |||
Packet without TNC on Windows - assistance appreciated | Digital | |||
Packet without TNC on Windows - assistance appreciated | Digital |