Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , RST Engineering \(jw\) wrote:
Sorry, dude, 50 years of designing with crystals, right from when I ground my first surplus WWII rock on a piece of glass with toothpaste as the abrasive says that what the original poster asked is correct. Will the harmonic be precise? No. Will it be "close", which is what the original poster asked? You bet. Depending on the oscillator circuit, can it be "pulled" on frequency? Perhaps. But to say that the crystal doesn't resonate anywhere near the harmonic is, as I said, bullpuckey. This reminds me of a colleague who can easily tell everyone qualitatively that a situation deviates from theoretical ideals and as a result (using my words and not his) "$#!+ (poop) will splatter!" But he at least often in my experience have trouble saying this quantatively! For one project, I decide to try something, and tell my boss what I am trying. This colleague of mine says (using words of mine and not his), "slop will spatter"! (As in light for adding optics to a light source for a specific application. This application has multiple LEDs shining onto an optical device with multiple elements.) Boss tells me that what I delivered to him and he found working should not have worked according to this colleague of mine, due to stray beams forming. So what do I do - I send photos to the boss of the beam pattern including the stray beams predicted by my colleague. I even named these stray beams after my colleague. But they were minor due to most light produced by the light source being on paths that resulted in adding to the desired beam combination as opposed to the undesired stray beams. Furthermore, my boss's industrial designer designed a baffling system that blocked the small amount of light from the multi-element light source that was on paths towards the stray beams as opposed to the desired rays that were "on course" to be utilized by the multi-elemt optical assembly as planned. So beware that the situation may not be much worse than ideal when someone can tell you how you are deviating from ideal! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Make your own T2FD | Shortwave | |||
We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. | Policy | |||
BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO | Policy | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |