Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... I think that's wildly optimistic. First, many, many licensed amateurs aren't active and don't own a rig at all. Another very large fraction buy only VHF/UHF gear. And, I don't know whether your figure of 700k hams with U.S. licenses includes the large number who are residents of other countries and also have licenses in those countries. Many of the foreign hams I hear from give a U.S. callsign along with their native one. I think the only reason we get the radios we do is that the manufacturers can combine the design with equipment for other markets, such as public safety for HTs. I've read that the lack of 220 MHz HTs is because of the absence of a nearby public service band, so the manufacturers can't use the same design for both services. I find that believable. I don't know how important additional markets are to HF equipment development, or what they would be these days. My guess is that the manufacturers don't make an awful lot on their HF equipment lines. In any case, the total market, particularly for HF gear, is surely much less than this estimate. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Actually I agree. I was thinking of cutting that in half due to inactive hams and got in a rush and forgot to do that. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Any GE Progress Line Units Still Around? | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | General | |||
Why do hams always stand in the way of progress? | Scanner |